IGEM:Melbourne/2008/BioClock: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*'''[[/SPModel|Detailed version]]''' of Stephen's model | *'''[[/SPModel|Detailed version]]''' of Stephen's model | ||
**'''[[/Stage1_Model|Stage1 Model]]''' | **'''[[/Stage1_Model|Stage1 Model]]''' | ||
**'''[[/Stage2_Model|Stage2 Model]]''' | |||
**'''[[/David_Version|David Version]]''' | |||
*'''[[/SimonModel|Simon's Model]]''' of bioclock! | |||
*'''[[/SimonBinaryModel|Simon's Binary Model]]''' of bioclock! | |||
(note that we can combine the horizontal modularity of the first model with the vertical modularity of the second model to construct fully scalable systems that are not limited to binary or to information storage capacity. However binary is the best in terms of maximum storage with minimum cost) | |||
*'''[[/General_Modeling_Objectives|General Modeling Objectives]]''' | |||
=='''[[/Features_of_bioclock|Features_of_bioclock]]'''== | =='''[[/Features_of_bioclock|Features_of_bioclock]]'''== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 40: | ||
== | ==Feedback Loops - [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Melbourne/2008/BCFeedback Moved to]== | ||
=='''[[/Riboswitche|Riboswitch]]''' information - Researched by Shiny== | =='''[[/Riboswitche|Riboswitch]]''' information - Researched by Shiny== | ||
Latest revision as of 03:49, 2 May 2008
Questions about BioClock Project
Website about BioClock Project
- References for various aspects of models
Models
- Binary_counting Original idea as proposed by Di
- Version2 Based on an extension of Stephen's linear model, designed by Di
- Model001 It is based on binary counting and is a single cell implementation, designed by Lloyd
- Model002 It is based on binary counting and is a multi-cell implementation, designed by Lloyd
- Possible Model using a non-binary approach. Proposed by Stephen
- Detailed version of Stephen's model
- Simon's Model of bioclock!
- Simon's Binary Model of bioclock!
(note that we can combine the horizontal modularity of the first model with the vertical modularity of the second model to construct fully scalable systems that are not limited to binary or to information storage capacity. However binary is the best in terms of maximum storage with minimum cost)
