Endy: PTL Logic: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Tthe most intuitive definition of a PTL device | |||
Revision as of 20:06, 12 January 2006
I am working to develop a new type of logic, called Post-Translational Logic, or PTL. PTL devices regulate the post-translational modifications of proteins to define system state and control cell function.
Current synthetic biological circuits make use of protein-DNA and RNA-RNA interactions to control gene expression in bacteria-- such circuits are Protein-DNA logic, or PDL. A brief comparison of the two types of logic is as follows:
PDL
- Engineered around gene expression
- Typical parts: transcriptional regulators, translational regulators
- Typical signal: PoPS, resulting in desired cellular concentrations of proteins.
- Easier to engineer than PTL
- Slow response time (hours)
- Uses one subset of cellular functions
PTL
- Engineered around protein modifications
- Typical parts: kinases, phosphorylation sites, docking sites
- Typical signa: rate of modification, resulting in desired state of proteins.
- More difficult to engineer than PDL
- Fast response time (seconds)
- Explores a new set of applications
In designing PTL logic, I am working to answer the following questions:
- What is a PTL part?
- What is a PTL device?
- What signals are passed between devices?
- What are device performance specifications?
Below I will describe some of my ideas.
Tthe most intuitive definition of a PTL device