Holcombe:TemporalLimitsReview

SUPA Sydney University Perception and Action Lab Primer editing help refcard

Notes for the project described in [1] as well as forthcoming _Subjective Time_ MIT Press volumes

also see multiple drafts of consciousness vs. postdiction

integration interval

[2] found attention / central viewing dramatically increased motion integration interval, with max integration interval 10 sec as found by Burr and Santoro

effect of distance on temporal binding (in cases where low-level motion was avoided)

• Motoyoshi found x for
• For temporal freezing paper, we don't know precision
• Martini & Nakayama found X
• Long-range alignment judgment we found little effect in [3]
• Binocular rivalry waves can be slow, e.g.
• Migraine aura glacial
• On the other hand,
  • Don't forget Yan's relative motion result
  • Some apparently-spreading processes seem instantaneous (spokes illusion)

More discussion at my Google Doc on the topic, in reviews folder

modeling

Werkhoven, Snippe, & Toet. First-order, second-order, etc. low-pass filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-pass_filter

• acceleration and direction alternation

Error creating thumbnail: File missing	Error creating thumbnail: File missing

If temporally low-pass the Reichhardt outputs, all speeds represented in speed-modulated stimulus but not in unmodulated stimulus. If temporally low-pass the pre-filtering stage,wouldn't be able to perceive motion at high frequencies If delay stage is temporally low-pass,

refs

Error fetching PMID 15066396
Error fetching PMID 19386535

3. Linares D, Holcombe AO, and White AL. Where is the moving object now? Judgments of instantaneous position show poor temporal precision (SD = 70 ms). J Vis. 2009 Dec 8;9(13):9.1-14. DOI:10.1167/9.13.9 |