Dilute cDNA in water to...
Dilute cDNA in water to...
| || |
Begin ImageJ Analysis=== |+|
===Part 3: viability analysis ()===
|-|Today you will use an image analysis program called ImageJ. This is offered free of charge by the NIH (National Institutes of Health). Your goal is to determine the relative amounts of collagen II and collagen I, based on the intensity of the bands normalized by co-amplified GAPDH. This assay provides one piece of evidence for the overall question posed by this module, namely, what factors affect chondrocyte phenotype maintenance (vs. de-differentiation to fibroblasts) or stem cell chondrogenesis, and to what extent? If you finish the transcript-level analysis, you can move on to quantifying your live/dead data. |+|
|-|====Transcript intensity==== |+|
|-|*Begin by analyzing the teaching faculty data for freshly isolated chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells. |+|
|-|**Two files are available, which were taken at different exposure times: |+|
|-|**The samples from left to right are: (ladder), CN I chondrocyte, CN I stem cell, CN II chondrocyte, CN II stem cell. |+|
|-|**In each case, the lower band is the GAPDH internal control. |+|
|-|[[Image:20109-controls-0.12s.BMP|thumb|left|200px|Exposure: 0.12 sec]] |+|
|-|[[Image:20109-controls-0.32s.BMP|thumb|center|200px|Exposure: 0.32 sec]] |+|
|-|<br style="clear:both;"/> |+|
|-|#Open your agarose gel image by selecting ''File'' → ''Open'' |+|
|-|#Using the rectangle tool, select an area in the background of the gel, the hit ctrl-M to measure it. Copy the mean and max intensity to an Excel file, and save the file. |+|
|-|#Now select each of your collagen and GAPDH bands in turn and hit ctrl-M each time. Copy the area and mean intensity, as well as any other information you want to keep. Ultimately, you would like to compare the intensity of the CNII to the CNI band for each sample in an equivalent way. Be sure to justify the data analysis decisions that you make. |+|
|-|#*As one option, you could select equal areas from the center of each band, to avoid edge effects (where the band is dim) on mean intensity. |+|
|-|#*On the other hand, if both bands are equally bright, a thicker band would be indicative of more DNA. So you might want to compare both areas and intensities, instead of just intensities. Can you think of a way to use area and intensity to get something like "total pixel intensity" for each band? |+|
|-|#*You may also want to subtract the background intensity from each sample band value before taking any ratios. |+|
|-|#First, note the CNII/GAPDH and CNI/GAPDH ratios expected for stem cells and chondrocytes. Then, you can take the normalized CNII/CNI ratios if possible. ''What is the problem with doing this for the stem cells?'' |+|
|-|#Finally, you can analyze your own data and see where it falls relative to the chondrocytes and stem cells. |+|
|-|#If you have time, you can explore the built-in gel analysis program in ImageJ. |+|
|-|====Cell viability ==== |+|
|-|=====Cell Counting===== |+|
|-|Your goal for this section will be to compare the effort required for, and the resulting accuracy of, manually counting live and dead cells vs. doing so by semi-automated image analysis . After you are done, you might consider under what conditions you might prefer one method or the other. |+|
|-|If you don't have many cells to look at, extra data is available on today's [[Talk:20.109%28S10%29:Transcript-level_analysis_%28Day5%29 | Talk]] page. |+|
|-|#Open your live cell image ( green filter) by selecting ''File'' → ''Open'' |+|
|-|#Choose the line tool, and draw a line across the diameter of a typical cell |+|
|-|#Select ''Analyze'' → ''Set Scale'', and put 10 μm in under '''Known Distance''' |+|
|-|#*note: in lieu of using the exact pixel information from the camera, we simply are putting in the average size of a cell |+|
|-|#Convert your image to grey scale using ''Image'' → ''Type'' → ''8-bit'' |+|
|-|#Now you must somehow select your cells out from the background |+|
|-|#*One way to do this is by choosing ''Process'' → ''Binary'' → ''Make Binary''. However, you might find that clusters of cells are ‘read’ as a single cell. |+|
|-|#*An improved method is to use'' Image'' → ''Adjust'' → ''Threshold''. You can set the upper- and lower-bound intensities that define objects in your image. Play with the intensity sliders until your cells are mostly filled in with a red colour, but not overlapping with other cells whenever possible. |+|
|-|#Now you can count the objects. Choose ''Analyze'' → ''Analyze Particles'', and select '''''Show''''' →'''''Outlines''''', '''Display Results''', '''Summarize''', and '''Record Stats'''. Also choose a reasonable area (not diameter!) range for objects that are cell-sized. |+|
|-|#Try to play around with this process for a bit – are there any further changes you can make so the automated algorithm is as good as your eye? |+|
|-|#Record your final results (manual and best automated) in your notebook, for each sample that you have data for. Don’t forget to also count the dead cells, and subtract this number from the live cells (since the filter we used shows both green and red cells at once). |+|
==Statistical Analysis===== |+|
|-|Once you have cell counts (whether automated or manual) that you are happy with, you can practice doing some basic statistical analysis. |+|
|-|#Begin by downloading the following [[Media: S09_20109_M2D5-Stats.xls | Excel file]] as a framework to carry out the basic statistical manipulations we discussed in Lecture 3. The file is modified from one originally written by [http://web.mit.edu/be/people/engelward.htm Professor Bevin Engelward]. |+|
|-|#Find and plot 95% confidence intervals for the live cell counts and/or live cell percentage for each of your two samples. |+|
|-|#*What are the advantages and disadvantages of looking at counts versus percentages? In what situations would looking at counts be misleading? |+|
|-|#Compare the means (count and/or percentage) of your two samples. At what confidence level (if any) are they different? |+|
| || |
==For next time==
==For next time==
There are several ways to assess the presence or concentration of a protein. In the second module, you used a colorimetric Coomassie-based assay to measure the concentration of protein expressed by your bacteria. Because you were purifying a His-tagged protein from bacteria induced primarily to express said protein, you could assume that the protein concentration that you measured was primarily inverse pericam. In contrast, today you are trying to measure the concentration of a specific protein that is only one among many in a complex mixture.
A great way to identify proteins is to exploit antibodies – also called immunoglobulins – whether in a Western blot or by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). In native physiological settings (such as your own body), antibodies are secreted by B cells in response to pathogens. A given antibody is highly specific (KD ~ nM) for its binding partner, called an antigen, and the entire antibody population for a given person is incredibly diverse (>107 unique antibodies). Diversity is maintained by recombination processes at the DNA level, and specificity entailed by protein structure.
Antibody proteins comprise constant (C) and variable (V) regions, on both their heavy and light chains. The C regions determine antibody effector functions, such as antibody-dependent killing of infected cells. The three hypervariable portions of the V region together make up the antigen-recognition site. Only a small portion of an antigen, called an epitope, is recognized by its cognate antibody. This ~10 amino acid region may be linear, or it may be made up of linearly distant regions and thus recognized only when the antigen is in its native conformation. For example, conformation-dependent antibodies are useful for distinguishing different collagen types.
Schematics of indirect and sandwich ELISA.
Triangles indicate the protein of interest, and * indicates a conjugated enzyme for later detection. (Blocking step not shown.)
Antibodies can be raised in animals, special cell lines, and even genetically engineered. Polyclonal antibodies (pools of antibodies that recognize distinct epitopes on the same antigen) can be obtained from animal serum. The animal is infected with the antigen of interest in the presence of a costimulatory signal, usually multiple times, and then bled. In this case, a large fraction of the antibodies obtained will not be against the antigen of interest. In contrast, monoclonal antibodies can be made both highly specific and pure. In this process, normal antibody-producing B cells are fused with immortalized B cells derived from myelomas, and the two cell types are fused by chemical treatment with a limited efficiency. To select only heterogeneously fused cells, the cultures are maintained in medium in which myeloma cells alone cannot survive (often HAT medium). Normal B cells will naturally die out over time with no intervention, so ultimately only the fused cells, called hybridomas, remain. Genetic engineering can be used to combine a human antibody ‘frame’ (all of the C and part of the V region) with an antigen-recognition site discovered in another species (e.g., murine). When antibodies are used as therapeutics, this decreases the possibility that the patient’s body will treat them as foreign, compared to an antibody produced from only mouse genes. Normally, injecting an antibody from species X into an animal of species Y will cause production of anti-X antibodies, called secondary antibodies. These can be very useful in technical assays, as you will see below.
Today you will use antibodies against collagen in an indirect ELISA assay. Both indirect and sandwich ELISA are shown in the figure at right – can you see why sandwich ELISA might be the superior assay with respect to sensitivity and specificity? In indirect ELISA, the first step is to bind protein extracts, obtained from your two different culture conditions, to well plates. Next you will add a primary antibody that recognizes a particular antigen – namely, epitopes on collagen I or collagen II – to the relevant wells. (Actually, before adding the antibody you will "block" the plate with milk protein to prevent non-specific binding of the antibody.) Next, any excess antibody must be washed away with a mild detergent. Finally, a secondary antibody – namely one that recognizes the primary antibody – must be added. The secondary antibody is conjugated to alkaline phosphatase, which will undergo a colorimetric reaction in the presence of its substrate. Thus, the relative quantity of protein can be assessed by absorbance spectroscopy following substrate addition. To quantify the absolute amount of protein, you will run dilutions of a collagen standard in parallel with your culture samples. During your ELISA incubation steps, you can run the cDNAs you prepared last time out on a gel, and begin some analysis.
Reference: Abbas, A.K. & Lichtman, A.H. (2005). Cellular and Molecular Immunology (5th ed.). Philedelphia: Elsevier Saunders.
Changes for 2011: focus on setting up qPCR plate --> will be delicate operation; but still need to start ELISA (wait for DMB till next time)
Part 1: Day 1 of ELISA
Optional: Measure whole protein concentration
- If you wish, you can test your protein extracts using the Bradford assay from Module 2, then normalize the amount of total protein that you add per sample.
- Because you are ultimately interested in the ratio of collagen II to collagen I amounts, this step is not strictly necessary. However, it will give you more information than you otherwise have.
We will run this assay in a 96-well microtiter plate, as we did for the fluorescence titration curves in Module 1. In ELISA, we will be testing for absorbance at a particular wavelength, rather than emission.
- Label one 96-well plate as your collagen I assay, and one as your collagen II assay. (Why might we want to use separate plates?)
- The first step in indirect ELISA is to adsorb all your samples to the wells. You will also need to prepare standard samples in the same plate, which get treated just the same as your test samples. These standards will be used as a reference for protein concentration. Both standards and unknown samples will be run in duplicate (see figure at right).
Suggested ELISA plan.
This plan can be used for both your collagen I and your collagen II plate. In each case, columns 1 and 2 are duplicates of the collagen standards, and column 3 contains your experimental samples and a few wells (labeled BLANK) to measure background.
- You will be given 250 μL aliquots of collagens I and II at 10 μg/mL each. Prepare your standards as follows:
- Ultimately, you want to pipet 50 μL per well of each standard concentration, two wells per standard.
- Option 1:
- Prepare 7 eppendorf tubes with 120 μL of PBS each.
- Add 120 μL of the 10 μg/mL collagen to the first eppendorf tube, and vortex.
- Now take 120 μL of that standard (now 5 μg/mL) and add it to the next eppendorf tube.
- When you are all done or as you go, pipet the standards into the appropriate wells.
- Option 2:
- Pipet 50 μL of PBS into wells 1 and 2 of rows B-H (skip A!).
- Pipet 100 μL of the 10 μg/mL collagen into the appropriate wells (A1 and A2).
- Using a regular or multichannel pipet, transfer 50 μL of these solutions to the next wells down (B1 and B2), and mix with the PBS.
- Repeat, now moving 50 μL of the 5 μg/mL solution in the B wells down to the C wells.
- Either of these methods is called making doubling dilutions. Which way do you think introduces less error?
- Now add 50 μL of your samples to the appropriate wells. For the blank wells you should add PBS.
- Cover each plate (CN I and CNII) when you are done, wrap around it with parafilm to better prevent evaporation, and allow the samples to sit for 80 minutes. In the meantime, set up your agarose gel (Part 2).
- After the incubation time has passed, you will wash and then block your plate.
- First, flick the solutions in the plate into the sink.
- Using the multichannel pipet and a reservoir, add 200 μL of Wash Buffer to each well, then gently swirl the plate (by hand) for a few seconds.
- Flick the solutions out again, and then blot the plate against paper towels. You can smack the plates pretty hard, but it is possible to break them!
- Repeat the wash one more time.
- Finally, add 200 μL of Block Buffer to the plate. Wait another 60-90 minutes. In the meantime, work on your analysis (Part 3).
- Repeat the wash step that you performed above, again with two rinses.
- When you are ready, ask the teaching faculty for some primary anti-collagen antibodies (these should be diluted at the last minute). Add 100 μL of diluted antibody per well.
- Your samples will be left overnight in antibody solution, then moved back to block buffer by the teaching faculty.
Part 2: Set up qPCR reaction
Three different master mixes for three different primer sets... made for you because sensitive/ensure reproducibility...
Dilute cDNA in water to...
Part 3: Continue viability analysis (optional)
For next time
1. The final draft of your Module 2 research article is due by 11 AM next time. Please name your files according to the following convention: Firstinitial_Lastname_LabSection_Mod2-Rev.doc and email them to email@example.com
- ELISA solutions
- PBS reconstituted from EMD tablets
- 140 mM NaCl
- 10 mM phosphate buffer
- 3 mM KCl
- pH 7.4
- Wash buffer
- Block buffer
- ELISA collagen-specific reagents
- All from GeneTex
- Collagen I standard, diluted from 1 mg/mL in PBS
- Collagen II standard, diluted from 1 mg/mL in PBS
- Collagen I antibody, diluted 1:4000 from 1 mg/mL in PBS
- Collagen II antibody, diluted 1:4000 from 1 mg/mL in PBS