(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 14:29, 24 January 2013
Instructors: Shannon Hughes, Alan Jasanoff, and Agi Stachowiak
S13 notes: This experiment will be largely unchanged from the S12 version, with three potential exceptions: (1) The 8th day will be added back, dedicated solely to in-class analysis; (2) More than three reference mutation options will be offered, after additional pilot experiments are run; (3) Possibly the final assay will be done in Tris or similar buffer rather than water, IFF the wild-type and other reference cases are reproducible in this format. I also would like to re-frame some of the lecture and lab content to emphasize signal measurement theory.
In this experiment, you will modify a protein called inverse pericam (developed by Nagai et al.) in order to affect its function. Inverse pericam (IPC) comprises a permuted fluorescent protein linked to a calcium sensor. The “inverse” in the name refers to the fact that this protein shines brightly in the absence of calcium, but dimly once calcium is added at sufficient concentration. The dissociation constant KD of wild-type IPC with respect to calcium is reported to be 0.2 μM (see also figure below). Your goal will be to alter the binding curve by mutating a single residue in IPC. You will modify inverse pericam at the gene level using a process called site-directed mutagenesis, express the resultant protein in a bacterial host, and finally purify your mutant protein and assay its calcium-binding activity via fluorescence. You may find that you shift the titration curve, which corresponds to altering KD; or you might change its steepness, which corresponds to changing cooperativity (and thus concentration dynamic range); finally, you might affect the maximum and/or minimum fluorescence values, thus changing the sensor's signal:noise profile (fluorescence dynamic range). You might even obliterate the response to calcium entirely! In the course of this module, we will consider the benefits and drawbacks of different approaches to protein design, and the types of scientific investigations and applications enabled by fluorescently tagged biological molecules.
We gratefully acknowledge 20.109 instructor Natalie Kuldell for helpful discussions during the development of this module, as well as for her prior work in developing a related module.
Raw titration curve for IPC.
Shown here is sample data from the teaching lab: normalized fluorescence for wild-type inverse pericam as a function of calcium concentration. As you will later learn, an apparent KD
can be estimated from such a plot: it is the point on the x
-axis where the curve crosses y
= 50%, or ~0.1 μM here.
Fitted titration curve for IPC.
A more sophisticated analysis using curve-fitting indeed reveals KD
to be ~ 0.1 μM, close to the reported value for inverse pericam.
Module 2 Day 1: Design mutant
Module 2 Day 2: Site-directed mutagenesis
Module 2 Day 3: Bacterial amplification of DNA
Module 2 Day 4: Prepare expression system
Note: spring break week occurs between day 4 and day 5 of lab.
Module 2 Day 5: Induce protein and evaluate DNA
Module 2 Day 6: Purify protein
Module 2 Day 7: Characterize protein expression
Module 2 Day 8: Assess protein function
Protein engineering research article
TA notes, mod 2