2020(S08) Lecture:week 11
<html> <style>#en2020 a {color:black;}</style> </html>
Home | Lecture schedule |
Studio schedule |
Expectations |
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 | |||
Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 |
20.902/20.947 | Student Resources | Teacher Resources |
Week 11 Studio
Part 1: Ownership and Sharing Challenge
Many useful genetic parts are currently protected by patents. For example, "uses of green fluorescent protein" is protected by United States Patent #5,491,084. At least 200 more recent patents protect additional uses of various fluorescent proteins. Patents are a legislated form of "intellectual property" by which inventors are granted a limited-time monopoly (~17 years) during which they can control access to the patented technology (e.g., by selling exclusive or non-exclusive licenses). In establishing the U.S. patent system, the founders of our country wanted to balance the sharing of inventions (e.g., via the publishing of patent applications) while also encouraging the investment and profit needed to drive innovation.
For today's challenge, many of your classmates will act as the inventors and patent holders of various genetic parts; each patent holder may license the use of their patents for profit (exclusively or non-exclusively), or give away the rights for free. Other classmates will act as investors who are seeking to license the complete set of genetic parts needed to encode the now familiar Eau d'E.coli system.
The first investor who is able to acquire licenses for all the genetic parts needed to encode the full Eau d'E.coli system will earn $100 in real cash money. This winning investor (if any) will be required to pay all inventors whatever fees might have been negotiated in obtaining the rights to use various genetic parts. If the promised fees are less than $100 then the investor can keep any additional cash. If the promised fees are greater than $100 then the investor must pay all additional licensing fees out of their own cash reserves.
The 12 components needed to produce a full Eau d'E.coli system are:
- A genetically encoded "inverter"
- A "constitutive PoPS source"
- A "stationary phase PoPS source"
- A "transcription terminator"
- A "weak ribosome binding site"
- A "strong ribosome binding site"
- The gene encoding the "ATF1" enzyme
- The gene encoding the "BSMT" enzyme
- The gene encoding the "PCHA" enzyme
- The gene encoding the "PCHB" enzyme
- The gene encoding the "BAT2" enzyme
- The gene encoding the "THI3" enzyme
Part 2: Project Redesign Day 2
Week 11 Thursday
Challenge: Parts
Poetry by Numbers
Inspired by This American Life #354: Mistakes Were Made
Poem 1
Consider the content of ‘This is Just to Say” a poem by William Carlos Williams
I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox
and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast
Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold
Poem 2
The poem is often taught in poetry classes and often spoofed. Consider, for instance, these 2 spoofs by Kenneth Koch:
Last evening
we went dancing
and I broke your leg
Forgive me
I was clumsy and
I wanted you here
in the wards
where I am the doctor
Poem 3
I chopped down the house that you had been saving to live in next summer.
I am sorry, but it was morning, and I had nothing to do
and its wooden beams were so inviting.
Poem 4
And one more spoof from the blog somewhere in the suburbs
I have dried
the shirt
made of 100% cotton
that was on your floor
and which
you were probably
planning
to air dry
Forgive me
if you had sorted
your own laundry
it would not be
so short
and so small
Poetic Parts
If you wanted to write your own spoof of the William Carlos Williams poem, you might begin by comparing the structure of these four poems. As a starting point they can be broken into 5 elements, namely
- 2 part situation
- “forgive me,” and
- 2 part explanation.
For each poem, these elements are:
Situation (part 1) | Situation (part 2) | Forgive me | Explanation (part 1) | Explanation (part 2) |
I have eaten the plums that were in the icebox | and which you were probably saving for breakfast | Forgive me | they were delicious | so sweet and so cold |
Last evening we went dancing | and I broke your leg | Forgive me | I was clumsy | and I wanted you here in the wards where I am the doctor |
I chopped down the house | that you had been saving to live in next summer. | I am sorry, | but it was morning, and I had nothing to do | and its wooden beams were so inviting. |
I have dried the shirt made of 100% cotton that was on your floor | and which you were probably planning to air dry | Forgive me | if you had sorted your own laundry | it would not be so short and so small |
Mix & Match Poetry
Now we can try to swap these poetic elements to see what interesting and clever spoofs we write. How about:
Situation (part 1) | Situation (part 2) | Forgive me | Explanation (part 1) | Explanation (part 2) |
I have eaten the plums that were in the icebox | and I broke your leg | Forgive me | but it was morning, and I had nothing to do | and I wanted you here in the wards where I am the doctor |
That seems to work but is it better? Let's try again:
Situation (part 1) | Situation (part 2) | Forgive me | Explanation (part 1) | Explanation (part 2) |
I chopped down the house | and which you were probably planning to air dry | Forgive me | they were delicious | it would not be so short and so small |
Well shoot, that's horrible. For one thing: It doesn't say anything understandable and for another thing: the connection between the different elements is, well, "awkward."
These problems in assembly of the poetic parts are discussed in the realm of biological engineering as problems of
- "functional composition" (put the parts together in the right pattern but the outcome doesn't make sense) and
- physical composition (enabled by a common junction between parts so you don't get gibberish like, "I chopped down the house and which...")
As introduction to genetic parts, watch Device dude and Systems Sally's introduction to Parts