840:153g:Projects/project12/2010/11/18: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Autocreate 2010/11/18 Entry for 840:153g:Projects/project12)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
==Entry title==
Disappointment
* Insert content here...
* On Tuesday, we digested our lux superpart (BBa_J37015) and ran on a gel with our PCR products of the RFP protein. We didn't see the two bands at around 2600 bp and 2000 bp for the lux superpart, but we did see the amplification of our RFP protein. So we had the lux superpart sent in to be sequenced. Today, we did a digestion of the lux promoter and ran a gel at 1.7%. We saw faint bands, but not where we expect them to be. So, we threw the gel away. We are having two different promoter samples sent in to be sequenced as well. 





Revision as of 16:09, 18 November 2010

Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Disappointment

  • On Tuesday, we digested our lux superpart (BBa_J37015) and ran on a gel with our PCR products of the RFP protein. We didn't see the two bands at around 2600 bp and 2000 bp for the lux superpart, but we did see the amplification of our RFP protein. So we had the lux superpart sent in to be sequenced. Today, we did a digestion of the lux promoter and ran a gel at 1.7%. We saw faint bands, but not where we expect them to be. So, we threw the gel away. We are having two different promoter samples sent in to be sequenced as well.