Amanda N. Wavrin Week 12: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(added txt and xls files) |
(finished sanity check) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*[[Media:Merrell Compiled Raw Data Vibrio AW 20100413(1).xls|xls file]] | *[[Media:Merrell Compiled Raw Data Vibrio AW 20100413(1).xls|xls file]] | ||
*[[Media:Merrell Compiled Raw Data Vibrio AW 20100413(1).txt|txt file]] | *[[Media:Merrell Compiled Raw Data Vibrio AW 20100413(1).txt|txt file]] | ||
===Sanity Check=== | |||
*Selected autofilter for the GenMAPP worksheet | |||
*Two genes have a p value less then .05 | |||
*With the Avg_LogFC_all set to greater than 0 there are two genes | |||
*With the Avg_LogFC_all set to less than 0 there are no genes left | |||
*With the average log fold change set to >.25 or <-.25 are were two genes | |||
*Merrell et al. reported these genes as having been significantly changed: | |||
**Gene VC0028: p value of 0.329215968 and a fold change of 1.652615448 | |||
**Gene VC0941: p value of 0.818557972 and a fold change of 0.093359611 | |||
**Gene VC0869: p value of 0.453843078 and a fold change of 1.592137524 | |||
**Gene VC0051: p value of 0.279910262 and a fold change of 1.921808516 | |||
**Gene VC0647: p value of 0.368013349 and a fold change of -1.112615156 | |||
**Gene VC0468: p value of 0.930118019 and a fold change of -0.168589663 | |||
**Gene VC2350: p value of 0.164978526 and a fold change of -2.402891699 | |||
**Gene VCA0583: p value of 0.24189621 and a fold change of 1.062812449 | |||
Revision as of 22:33, 18 April 2010
Vibrio choleraeMicroarray Presentation Assignment
Normalizing the Log Ratios for the Set of Slides in the Experiment
- Created a new excel sheet labeled scaled_centered
- Copy and pasted the spreadsheet into the new scaled_centered sheet
- Inserted two rows at the top below the headers
- Added headers "Average" to cell A2 and "StdDev" to cell A3
- Computed the average log ratio using the equation =AVERAGE(B4:B5224)
- Computed the StdDev using equations such as =STDEV(B4:B5224)
- Now will do the scaling and centering using these found values
- Added "scaled_centered" columns after each column
- Used the equation =(B4-$B$2)/$B$3, =(D4-$D$2)/$D$3, and so on
Performing Statistical Analysis on the Ratios
- Added new worksheet labeked statistics
- Used the new worksheet to compute the average log fold change for the replicates for each patient
- Calculated the averages of the averages
- Computed a T statistic to tell us whether the average log ratio is significantly different than 0
- Calculated the Pvalue using the equation =TDIST(ABS(R2),degrees of freedom,2, Using 2 for the degrees of freedom
- Inserted a new worksheet and labeled it "forGenMAPP"
- Changed cells B to Q to 2 decimal places
- Changed cells R through S to 4 decimal places
- Then moved columns N through S
- added SystemCode column
GenMAPP Workskeets
Sanity Check
- Selected autofilter for the GenMAPP worksheet
- Two genes have a p value less then .05
- With the Avg_LogFC_all set to greater than 0 there are two genes
- With the Avg_LogFC_all set to less than 0 there are no genes left
- With the average log fold change set to >.25 or <-.25 are were two genes
- Merrell et al. reported these genes as having been significantly changed:
- Gene VC0028: p value of 0.329215968 and a fold change of 1.652615448
- Gene VC0941: p value of 0.818557972 and a fold change of 0.093359611
- Gene VC0869: p value of 0.453843078 and a fold change of 1.592137524
- Gene VC0051: p value of 0.279910262 and a fold change of 1.921808516
- Gene VC0647: p value of 0.368013349 and a fold change of -1.112615156
- Gene VC0468: p value of 0.930118019 and a fold change of -0.168589663
- Gene VC2350: p value of 0.164978526 and a fold change of -2.402891699
- Gene VCA0583: p value of 0.24189621 and a fold change of 1.062812449
