Andrew Forney Week 9: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Quick save for in-class) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
====Electronic Lab Notebook: Week 9==== | ====Electronic Lab Notebook: Week 9==== | ||
Andrew H and I followed the instructions afforded by the protocol, using my text file computed in the previous assignment. After defining our expression set, the following results were observed: | |||
* The number of errors discovered in the output was: 772 | * The number of errors discovered in the output was: 772 | ||
* The number of errors on my database, the older version, was far greater--772 compared to 121 for Andrew H. Most likely, this is because more genomic information for the vibrio colerae species exists in a more up-to-date database, and as such, more recently-defined proteins were found in Andrew's case than in mine. | |||
* The EX.txt file can be found here: [[Media:Merrell_Compiled_Raw_Data_Vibrio_Forney1.EX.txt|Error Output .txt]] | * The EX.txt file can be found here: [[Media:Merrell_Compiled_Raw_Data_Vibrio_Forney1.EX.txt|Error Output .txt]] |
Revision as of 18:04, 26 October 2010
Author: Andrew Forney
Assignment: Individual Journal 9
Electronic Lab Notebook: Week 9
Andrew H and I followed the instructions afforded by the protocol, using my text file computed in the previous assignment. After defining our expression set, the following results were observed:
- The number of errors discovered in the output was: 772
- The number of errors on my database, the older version, was far greater--772 compared to 121 for Andrew H. Most likely, this is because more genomic information for the vibrio colerae species exists in a more up-to-date database, and as such, more recently-defined proteins were found in Andrew's case than in mine.
- The EX.txt file can be found here: Error Output .txt