Artificial transcriptional terminators

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 30: Line 30:
==Designed terminators==
==Designed terminators==
The score d is calculated as mentioned above.  The energy of hairpin formation, delG, is caluclated using UNAFold.
The score d is calculated as mentioned above.  The energy of hairpin formation, delG, is caluclated using UNAFold.
These terminators are designed to be bidirectional.  delG reverse is the energy of hairpin formation on the opposite strand.
*Terminator 1:
*Terminator 1:

Revision as of 16:11, 29 August 2006

The goal is to create a series of transcriptional terminators with varying efficiencies. The majority of transcriptional terminators have a G+C rich stem of 7(+/-1)bp and a loop of 4(+/-1) nucleodtides followed by a poly(U) tail. Two common loops are UUCG and GAAA, both of which are known to increase RNA hairpin stability. The sequence GCGGG(G) is a common sequence found on the 3' arm of the stem. [1]


Effects of stem loop sequence on terminator efficiency

Bulges and mismatches in the stem, as well low G+C content of the stem will lower TE more than reducing the length of or elimination of the poly(U) tail [2]. The sequences downstream of the poly(U) tail and between the stop codon and the start of the stem loop structure also affect the TE of a terminator, particularly T7Te or T3Te.

  • T7Te

Several sources [3] [Chamberlin 79] measured the termination efficiency(TE) of T7Te at around 90%. However, efficiency for the biobricks part BBa_B0012 [1], also T7Te, is around 30%. T7Te has a very short poly(U) tail and requires the further downstream sequence for efficiecent termination [3], and this further downstream sequence is lacking in BBa_B0012. If the sequence for BBa_B0012 is lengthened to include this downstream segment, then the TE of part should be improved.

Predicting terminator efficiency

It may be possible to predict terminator efficiency using methods from d'Aubenton, in particular, the score d assigned to a possible terminator sequence

d = nt*18.16+Y*96.59-116.87

where nt measures the statistical distribution of the T residues in the non transcribed DNA strand and Y is the free energy per nucleodtide of the stem loop structure.

The score d will give a rough estimate of how efficient a terminator is.

d<0: TE<20%

0<d<30: 20%<TE<70%

d>30: TE>70%

Ideal terminator

  • has 6 base stem with 3' sequence of GCGGGG
  • 4 base loop, either UUCG or GAAA
  • tail containing >8 uridines
  • for a biobrick part, flanking regions will be biobrick site

Designed terminators

The score d is calculated as mentioned above. The energy of hairpin formation, delG, is caluclated using UNAFold.

These terminators are designed to be bidirectional. delG reverse is the energy of hairpin formation on the opposite strand.

  • Terminator 1:

delG=-12.6 d=59.31 %T>90

delG reverse=-10.2 d=44.82 %T>90

stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggttttttttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgaaaaaaaaaccccgcttcggc

primer 2: gcttcggcggggtttttttttcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 2:

delG=-12.6 d=35.78 %T>90

delG reverse=-10.2 d=21.28 %T=75

stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggtttttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtggggaaaaaaccccgcttcggc

primer 2: gcttcggcggggttttttgggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 3:

delG=-12.6 d=26.12 %T=80

delG reverse=-10.2 d=11.64 %T=40

stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggttttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggaaaaaccccgcttcggc

primer 2: gcttcggcggggtttttggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 4:

delG=-12.6 d=15.40 %T=55

delG reverse=-10.2 d=0.91 %T=<20

stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggtttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtggggggaaaaccccgcttcggc

primer 2: gcttcggcggggttttgggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 5:

delG=-12.6 d=3.49 %T=25

delG reverse=-10.2 d=-11 %T<10

stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggggaaaccccgcttcggc

primer 2: gcttcggcggggtttggggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 6:

delG=-16.2 d=54.38 %T>90

delG reverse=-18.9 d=66.22 %T>90

stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggttttttttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgaaaaaaaaaccccgccccugacagg

primer 2: cccugacagggcggggtttttttttcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 7:

delG=-16.2 d=30.84 %T=80

delG reverse=-18.9 d=42.69 %T>90

stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggtttttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtggggaaaaaaccccgccccugacagg

primer 2: cccugacagggcggggttttttgggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 8:

delG=-16.2 d=21.19 %T=70

delG reverse=-18.9 d=33.03 %T=80

stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggttttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggaaaaaccccgccccugacagg

primer 2: cccugacagggcggggtttttggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 9:

delG=-16.2 d=10.46 %T=40

delG reverse=-18.9 d=22.31 %T=75

stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggtttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtggggggaaaaccccgccccugacagg

primer 2: cccugacagggcggggttttgggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 10:

delG=-16.2 d=-1.45 %T<10

delG reverse=-18.9 d=10.40 %T=40

stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggttt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggggaaaccccgccccugacagg

primer 2: cccugacagggcggggtttggggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

  • Terminator 11: this is not supposed to work. if it does, then something is wrong

delG=-3.3 d=-52.65 %T=0

delG reverse=-0.5 d=-69.56 %T=0

stem loop: ttttatgaaaataaaattt

primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggggaaattttatgaaaat

primer 2: atgaaaataaaatttggggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag


  1. d'Aubenton Carafa Y, Brody E, and Thermes C. . pmid:1702475. PubMed HubMed [Aubenton90]
  2. Abe H and Aiba H. . pmid:9150882. PubMed HubMed [Abe96]
  3. Reynolds R and Chamberlin MJ. . pmid:1372366. PubMed HubMed [Reynolds92II]
  4. Brendel V, Hamm GH, and Trifonov EN. . pmid:3078109. PubMed HubMed [Bredel86]
  5. Cheng SW, Lynch EC, Leason KR, Court DL, Shapiro BA, and Friedman DI. . pmid:1835546. PubMed HubMed [Cheng91]
  6. Christie GE, Farnham PJ, and Platt T. . pmid:7027254. PubMed HubMed [Christie81]
  7. Ermolaeva MD, Khalak HG, White O, Smith HO, and Salzberg SL. . pmid:10926490. PubMed HubMed [Ermolaeva00]
  8. Lesnik EA, Sampath R, Levene HB, Henderson TJ, McNeil JA, and Ecker DJ. . pmid:11522828. PubMed HubMed [Lesnik01]
  9. Lynn SP, Kasper LM, and Gardner JF. . pmid:2961747. PubMed HubMed [Lynn88]
  10. Petrillo M, Silvestro G, Di Nocera PP, Boccia A, and Paolella G. . pmid:16820051. PubMed HubMed [Petrillo06]
  11. Reynolds R, Bermúdez-Cruz RM, and Chamberlin MJ. . pmid:1372365. PubMed HubMed [Reynolds92I]
  12. Unniraman S, Prakash R, and Nagaraja V. . pmid:11809879. PubMed HubMed [Unniraman02]
  13. Uptain SM and Chamberlin MJ. . pmid:9391063. PubMed HubMed [Uptain97]
  14. von Hippel PH and Yager TD. . pmid:1536005. PubMed HubMed [VonHippel92]
  15. Wilson KS and von Hippel PH. . pmid:7966320. PubMed HubMed [Wilson94]
  16. Wilson KS and von Hippel PH. . pmid:7568019. PubMed HubMed [Wilson95]
  17. Yager TD and von Hippel PH. . pmid:1703438. PubMed HubMed [Yager91]
  18. Gusarov I and Nudler E. . pmid:10230402. PubMed HubMed [Gusarov99]
  19. de Hoon MJ, Makita Y, Nakai K, and Miyano S. . pmid:16110342. PubMed HubMed [deHoon05]
All Medline abstracts: PubMed HubMed
Personal tools