Artificial transcriptional terminators

From OpenWetWare

Revision as of 16:04, 29 August 2006 by Huangh (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

The goal is to create a series of transcriptional terminators with varying efficiencies. The majority of transcriptional terminators have a G+C rich stem of 7(+/-1)bp and a loop of 4(+/-1) nucleodtides followed by a poly(U) tail. Two common loops are UUCG and GAAA, both of which are known to increase RNA hairpin stability. The sequence GCGGG(G) is a common sequence found on the 3' arm of the stem. [1]


Effects of stem loop sequence on terminator efficiency

Bulges and mismatches in the stem, as well low G+C content of the stem will lower TE more than reducing the length of or elimination of the poly(U) tail [2]. The sequences downstream of the poly(U) tail and between the stop codon and the start of the stem loop structure also affect the TE of a terminator, particularly T7Te or T3Te.

  • T7Te

Several sources [3] [Chamberlin 79] measured the termination efficiency(TE) of T7Te at around 90%. However, efficiency for the biobricks part BBa_B0012 [1], also T7Te, is around 30%. T7Te has a very short poly(U) tail and requires the further downstream sequence for efficiecent termination [3], and this further downstream sequence is lacking in BBa_B0012. If the sequence for BBa_B0012 is lengthened to include this downstream segment, then the TE of part should be improved.

Predicting terminator efficiency

It may be possible to predict terminator efficiency using methods from d'Aubenton, in particular, the score d assigned to a possible terminator sequence

d = nt*18.16+Y*96.59-116.87

where nt measures the statistical distribution of the T residues in the non transcribed DNA strand and Y is the free energy per nucleodtide of the stem loop structure.

The score d will give a rough estimate of how efficient a terminator is.

d<0: TE<20%

0<d<30: 20%<TE<70%

d>30: TE>70%

Ideal terminator

  • has 6 base stem with 3' sequence of GCGGGG
  • 4 base loop, either UUCG or GAAA
  • tail containing >8 uridines
  • for a biobrick part, flanking regions will be biobrick site

Designed terminators

The score d is calculated as mentioned above. The energy of hairpin formation, delG, is caluclated using UNAFold.

Terminator 1: delG=-12.6 d=59.31 %T>90 delG reverse=-10.2 d=44.82 %T>90 stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggttttttttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgaaaaaaaaaccccgcttcggc primer 2: gcttcggcggggtttttttttcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 2: delG=-12.6 d=35.78 %T>90 delG reverse=-10.2 d=21.28 %T=75 stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggtttttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtggggaaaaaaccccgcttcggc primer 2: gcttcggcggggttttttgggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 3: delG=-12.6 d=26.12 %T=80 delG reverse=-10.2 d=11.64 %T=40 stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggttttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggaaaaaccccgcttcggc primer 2: gcttcggcggggtttttggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 4: delG=-12.6 d=15.40 %T=55 delG reverse=-10.2 d=0.91 %T=<20 stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggtttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtggggggaaaaccccgcttcggc primer 2: gcttcggcggggttttgggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 5: delG=-12.6 d=3.49 %T=25 delG reverse=-10.2 d=-11 %T<10 stem loop: ccccgcttcggcggggttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggggaaaccccgcttcggc primer 2: gcttcggcggggtttggggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 6: delG=-16.2 d=54.38 %T>90 delG reverse=-18.9 d=66.22 %T>90 stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggttttttttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgaaaaaaaaaccccgccccugacagg primer 2: cccugacagggcggggtttttttttcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 7: delG=-16.2 d=30.84 %T=80 delG reverse=-18.9 d=42.69 %T>90 stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggtttttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtggggaaaaaaccccgccccugacagg primer 2: cccugacagggcggggttttttgggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 8: delG=-16.2 d=21.19 %T=70 delG reverse=-18.9 d=33.03 %T=80 stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggttttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggaaaaaccccgccccugacagg primer 2: cccugacagggcggggtttttggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 9: delG=-16.2 d=10.46 %T=40 delG reverse=-18.9 d=22.31 %T=75 stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggtttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtggggggaaaaccccgccccugacagg primer 2: cccugacagggcggggttttgggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 10: delG=-16.2 d=-1.45 %T<10 delG reverse=-18.9 d=10.40 %T=40 stem loop: ccccgccccugacagggcggggttt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggggaaaccccgccccugacagg primer 2: cccugacagggcggggtttggggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag

Terminator 11: this is not supposed to work. if it does, then something is wrong delG=-3.3 d=-52.65 %T=0 delG reverse=-0.5 d=-69.56 %T=0 stem loop: ttttatgaaaataaaattt primer 1: gaattcgcggcgcttctagatcgcgtgggggggaaattttatgaaaat primer 2: atgaaaataaaatttggggggcgcgagtactagtagcggcggctgcag


  1. d'Aubenton Carafa Y, Brody E, and Thermes C. . pmid:1702475. PubMed HubMed [Aubenton90]
  2. Abe H and Aiba H. . pmid:9150882. PubMed HubMed [Abe96]
  3. Reynolds R and Chamberlin MJ. . pmid:1372366. PubMed HubMed [Reynolds92II]
  4. Brendel V, Hamm GH, and Trifonov EN. . pmid:3078109. PubMed HubMed [Bredel86]
  5. Cheng SW, Lynch EC, Leason KR, Court DL, Shapiro BA, and Friedman DI. . pmid:1835546. PubMed HubMed [Cheng91]
  6. Christie GE, Farnham PJ, and Platt T. . pmid:7027254. PubMed HubMed [Christie81]
  7. Ermolaeva MD, Khalak HG, White O, Smith HO, and Salzberg SL. . pmid:10926490. PubMed HubMed [Ermolaeva00]
  8. Lesnik EA, Sampath R, Levene HB, Henderson TJ, McNeil JA, and Ecker DJ. . pmid:11522828. PubMed HubMed [Lesnik01]
  9. Lynn SP, Kasper LM, and Gardner JF. . pmid:2961747. PubMed HubMed [Lynn88]
  10. Petrillo M, Silvestro G, Di Nocera PP, Boccia A, and Paolella G. . pmid:16820051. PubMed HubMed [Petrillo06]
  11. Reynolds R, Bermúdez-Cruz RM, and Chamberlin MJ. . pmid:1372365. PubMed HubMed [Reynolds92I]
  12. Unniraman S, Prakash R, and Nagaraja V. . pmid:11809879. PubMed HubMed [Unniraman02]
  13. Uptain SM and Chamberlin MJ. . pmid:9391063. PubMed HubMed [Uptain97]
  14. von Hippel PH and Yager TD. . pmid:1536005. PubMed HubMed [VonHippel92]
  15. Wilson KS and von Hippel PH. . pmid:7966320. PubMed HubMed [Wilson94]
  16. Wilson KS and von Hippel PH. . pmid:7568019. PubMed HubMed [Wilson95]
  17. Yager TD and von Hippel PH. . pmid:1703438. PubMed HubMed [Yager91]
  18. Gusarov I and Nudler E. . pmid:10230402. PubMed HubMed [Gusarov99]
  19. de Hoon MJ, Makita Y, Nakai K, and Miyano S. . pmid:16110342. PubMed HubMed [deHoon05]
All Medline abstracts: PubMed HubMed
Personal tools