BE Board:Visiting committee: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
**How reasonable is/ was your TAing requirement (time commitment, work load)? Should the undergraduate TAing assignments be assigned differently? | **How reasonable is/ was your TAing requirement (time commitment, work load)? Should the undergraduate TAing assignments be assigned differently? | ||
**Do you enjoy working with the undergraduates? | **Do you enjoy working with the undergraduates? | ||
**Do the instructors adequately and clearly cover material in class? Do you have to spend a lot of time outside of class explaining and clarifying | **Do the instructors adequately and clearly cover material in class? Do you have to spend a lot of time outside of class explaining and clarifying concepts? | ||
concepts? | **Would you like to be more involved in developing the undergraduate classes or have you had the oppurtunity to help develop them? | ||
**Would you like to be more involved in developing the undergraduate classes or have you had the oppurtunity to help | |||
**What do you think is missing from the undergraduate cirriculum? | **What do you think is missing from the undergraduate cirriculum? | ||
**Do you think the undergraduate classes will detract from the graduate experience and how? | **Do you think the undergraduate classes will detract from the graduate experience and how? | ||
*Summarized survey results: | *Summarized survey results: | ||
**TAing Experience | **TAing Experience | ||
***Majoring of students found it valuable(~4) | ***Majoring of students found it valuable (~4) | ||
***Suggestions to avoid increased or unequal responsibilities | ***Suggestions to avoid increased or unequal responsibilities | ||
****Pay TA’s | ****Pay TA’s | ||
Line 84: | Line 83: | ||
***Perhaps graduate students could have access to the evaluations of students in the undergraduate courses that they TA. TA's and professors could then discuss potential improvements to the course. | ***Perhaps graduate students could have access to the evaluations of students in the undergraduate courses that they TA. TA's and professors could then discuss potential improvements to the course. | ||
***Having student input for A) which courses should be included, B) which are mandatory, which are elective, and C) the content of certain courses. | ***Having student input for A) which courses should be included, B) which are mandatory, which are elective, and C) the content of certain courses. | ||
***To aid in curriculum development, course plans should be presented to the Division (perhaps in a | ***To aid in curriculum development, course plans should be presented to the Division (perhaps in a seminar-type forum?) to provide the opportunity for members of the BE community to provide initial feedback on the undergraduate curriculum. | ||
seminar-type forum?) to provide the opportunity for members of the BE community to provide initial feedback on the undergraduate curriculum. | |||
===Thesis Mentoring (Diana, Danielle)=== | ===Thesis Mentoring (Diana, Danielle)=== |
Revision as of 11:52, 18 April 2006
For current website see begradboard.mit.edu
Student opinionPeople
Topic AreasAdd, subtract as you see fit Curriculum
Advisor Selection Process (Diana)
Facilities (Nate & Maxine)
Career Development (Nate, Jordan)
Undergraduate Major (Amy)
Thesis Mentoring (Diana, Danielle)
Faculty Research DirectionsFaculty/Student Interactions (Maxine)
ABS/Bioengineering (Paul, Bahar)General BE Board Activity Updates (Diana, Barry)
|