BIOL398-01/S11:Class Journal Week 6

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(formatting created)
(Instructions: added instructions)
Line 8: Line 8:
* Add the "BIOL398-01/S11" category to the end of the wiki page (if someone has not already done so).
* Add the "BIOL398-01/S11" category to the end of the wiki page (if someone has not already done so).
-
===Reflection===
+
=== Reflection on a Quantitative Look at Nitrogen Metabolism ===
 +
# What was the purpose of this assignment?
 +
# What aspect of this assignment came most easily to you?
 +
# What aspect of this assignment was the most challenging for you?
 +
# What (yet) do you not understand?
 +
 +
=== Read and Reflect ===
 +
 +
* Compare the [http://mic.sgmjournals.org/cgi/reprint/141/5/1101 current] ter Schure ''et al'' paper (''Microbiology'', 1995, '''141''', pp1101-1108) with the [http://jb.asm.org/cgi/reprint/177/22/6672 previously discussed] ''J. Bacteriology'' (1995) '''177''', no. 22, pp6672-6675, paper.
 +
*# In what ways are the goals of the papers different?
 +
*# What things in the ''Microbiology'' paper help clarify methods in the ''Bacteriology'' paper?
 +
*# Do you feel anything is lacking for the purposes of developing a math model and simulating nitrogen metabolism?  If so, what?
== Class Responses ==  
== Class Responses ==  

Revision as of 14:40, 17 February 2011

Contents

Instructions

Formatting

  • Link to your journal entry from your user page.
  • Link back from the journal entry to your user page.
  • Sign your portion of the journal with the standard wiki signature shortcut (~~~~).
  • Add the "BIOL398-01/S11" category to the end of the wiki page (if someone has not already done so).

Reflection on a Quantitative Look at Nitrogen Metabolism

  1. What was the purpose of this assignment?
  2. What aspect of this assignment came most easily to you?
  3. What aspect of this assignment was the most challenging for you?
  4. What (yet) do you not understand?

Read and Reflect

  • Compare the current ter Schure et al paper (Microbiology, 1995, 141, pp1101-1108) with the previously discussed J. Bacteriology (1995) 177, no. 22, pp6672-6675, paper.
    1. In what ways are the goals of the papers different?
    2. What things in the Microbiology paper help clarify methods in the Bacteriology paper?
    3. Do you feel anything is lacking for the purposes of developing a math model and simulating nitrogen metabolism? If so, what?

Class Responses

Sarah Carratt's Journal Entry

Carmen E. Castaneda's Journal Entry

James C. Clements' Journal Entry

Nicholas A. Rohacz's Journal Entry

Alondra Vega's Journal Entry

Personal tools