BIOL398-03/S13:Class Journal Week 2: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(answered work and reflect)
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:


[[User:Kevin Matthew McKay|Kevin Matthew McKay]] 22:39, 23 January 2013 (EST)
[[User:Kevin Matthew McKay|Kevin Matthew McKay]] 22:39, 23 January 2013 (EST)
==Kasey E. O'Connor Week 2 Journal Entry==
[[User:Kasey E. O'Connor|Kasey E. O'Connor]]
=====Reflection on Work=====
#What was the purpose of this assignment?
#What aspect of this assignment came most easily to you?
#What aspect of this assignment was the most challenging for you?
#What (yet) do you not understand?
=====Read and Reflect=====
#What distinction does Lander draw between modeling to "discover new knowledge" and modeling for "understanding"?
#Which point of view resonates with you more? Why?

Revision as of 21:09, 23 January 2013


user:Kevin Matthew McKay

Week 2 questions

Reflection on Work

  • What was the purpose of this assignment?
    • To understand the math behind the chemostat and improve our MATLAB skills.
  • What aspect of this assignment came most easily to you?
    • Understanding the math and biology of the chemostat.
  • What aspect of this assignment was the most challenging for you?
    • Doing anything in MATLAB I do not understand it other than the most basic things shown in the tutorial. Working with the computer, I do not like computers and I really very much do not enjoy writing code and working with computer programs.
  • What (yet) do you not understand?
    • MATLAB.

Read and Reflect

  • What distinction does Lander draw between modeling to "discover new knowledge" and modeling for "understanding"?
    • Lander clearly favors modeling with the purpose of understanding, and comments on how it is seen as trivial when compared to the discovery of new knowledge. While discovery of new knowledge is finding bits and pieces of information accepted as "facts", truly understanding includes taking those facts and connecting them to other knowledge (the metaphor of the hairball, the nodes would be facts while the edges are understanding).
  • Which point of view resonates with you more?
    • I find that I get more out of understanding then I do out of straight facts. Knowing the facts is great, but without the anchor of understanding, facts will quickly exit one's memory. I know this from experience. I remember biological processes much better when I actually understand them for example, I really understand the Krebbs cycle because I can draw it out and explain every part of it, not just because I have memorized the diagram.

Kevin Matthew McKay 22:39, 23 January 2013 (EST)

Kasey E. O'Connor Week 2 Journal Entry

Kasey E. O'Connor

Reflection on Work
  1. What was the purpose of this assignment?
  2. What aspect of this assignment came most easily to you?
  3. What aspect of this assignment was the most challenging for you?
  4. What (yet) do you not understand?
Read and Reflect
  1. What distinction does Lander draw between modeling to "discover new knowledge" and modeling for "understanding"?
  2. Which point of view resonates with you more? Why?