BME100 f2013:W900 Group15 L3

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
BME 100 Fall 2013 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR TEAM

Name: Gage Bebak
Role(s)
Name: Justin Dombrowski
Role(s)
Name: Saiswathi Javangula
Role(s)
Name: student
Role(s)
Name: student
Role(s)
Name: student
Role(s)

LAB 3A WRITE-UP

Descriptive Statistics

(Descriptive statistics for the data set)





Results

(Well-labeled graph with error bars and significance)




Analysis

(Perform inferential statistics described in assignment.)





Summary/Discussion

(Please discuss the results and statistical analysis. State your conclusion as well as design flaws and recommendations.)
Discussion:

Conclusion: We have concluded that the device we tested today is not not accurate, reliable, and the variability is high. The data has shown no correlation to that of the oral thermometer making it unusable and unreliable. Some flaws that we found while using the device were that it was way below the actual body temperature. The outside temperature and the temperature of the surroundings had a direct affect on the device's calculations. It also needed to be placed in an uncomfortable spot and when it was removed it would cause a bit of pain. The reading on the device itself vs the reading that was shown through the app were two completely different readings causing confusion as to which of the readings was correct. Honestly, the idea of a thermometer ran by an app is nice, however the practicality of it is not very high. The device needs to be remodeled and taken back to the drawing board, it has too many flaws to make it a viable product, even with some tweaking.




LAB 3B WRITE-UP

Target Population and Need



Device Design



Inferential Statistics



Graph