BME100 f2013:W900 Group6 L6: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 91: Line 91:
==Bonus Opportunity: What Bayesian Stats Imply About The BME100 Diagnostic Approach==
==Bonus Opportunity: What Bayesian Stats Imply About The BME100 Diagnostic Approach==


The percent value for calculation 3 is very small, telling us that the prediction of the cancer disease development is not very sensitive. The percent value for calculation 4 is close to one , telling us that the prediction of the cancer disease development is very specific.  
The percent value for calculation 3 is very small, telling us that the prediction of the cancer disease development is not very sensitive. Sensitivity tells us the probability of revealing that a person has cancer. This informs us of the probability that the person has the disease is given a positive test. The percent value for calculation 4 is close to one , telling us that the prediction of the cancer disease development is very specific. Specificity tells us the probability of revealing that a person does not have caner.  


''[Instructions: This section is OPTIONAL, and will get bonus points if answered thoroughly and correctly. Here is a chance to flex some intellectual muscle. In your own words, discuss what the results for calculations 3 and 4 imply about the reliability of CHEK2 PCR for predicting cancer. Please do NOT type the actual numerical values here. Just refer to them as being "less than one" or "very small." The instructors will ask you to submit your actual calculations via e-mail.  We are doing so for the sake of academic integrity and to curb any temptation to cheat.]''
''[Instructions: This section is OPTIONAL, and will get bonus points if answered thoroughly and correctly. Here is a chance to flex some intellectual muscle. In your own words, discuss what the results for calculations 3 and 4 imply about the reliability of CHEK2 PCR for predicting cancer. Please do NOT type the actual numerical values here. Just refer to them as being "less than one" or "very small." The instructors will ask you to submit your actual calculations via e-mail.  We are doing so for the sake of academic integrity and to curb any temptation to cheat.]''

Revision as of 19:46, 23 November 2013

BME 100 Fall 2013 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help

OUR COMPANY

Name: James Mendoza
Name: Courtney DuBois
Name: Brandon Kehring
Name: Areli Isherwood
Name: Jacob Hulett


GenX PCR-based Diagnostic Test


LAB 6 WRITE-UP

Computer-Aided Design

TinkerCAD

On November 20th we worked with the Tinkercad tool in which we designed each of the past tools that we have used in our labs. We used the tinkercad tool to better the PCR Tubes, the Open PCR machine, the phone holder for the Fluorimeter and the packaging for these devices. First we worked on the PCR Tubes "Blacking them out" in order to prevent things from bleaching such as the SYBR green in the previous lab, we also added markings on the side in order to see the measurements in the tube. We also designed some of the packaging for the device as well as the PCR machine which was more of a software fix than an actual design flaw.

Description of image


Implications of Using TinkerCAD for Design

One possible way to use tinkerCAD for something practical is the camera holder. What tinkerCad allows us to do is design an object easily and is a free tool so we can design a project without the need to buy materials and supplies and prototype the design. When the model is completed tinkerCAD also allows us to print off the design with the use of a 3D printer. We came up with the design for the camera holder because the one used in the previous lab would not hold the phone in an upright position because it was not adjustable to the phone we used, we developed a new design for the holder by making it adjustable and easy to figure out and use.


Feature 1: Cancer SNP-Specific Primers

[Instructions: This information will come from the Week 9 exercises you did in lab. Your notes should be in a pdf file that is saved on Blackboard under your group.]

Background on the cancer-associated mutation

[Instructions: Use the answers from questions 3, 4, 5, and 7 to compose, in your own words, a paragraph about rs17879961]


Primer design

  • Forward Primer: [Instructions: write the sequence of the forward primer]
  • Cancer-specific Reverse Primer: [Instructions: write the sequence of the forward primer]

How the primers work: [Instructions: explain what makes the primers cancer-sequence specific. In other words, explain why the primers will amplify DNA that contains the cancer-associated SNP rs17879961, and will not exponentially amplify DNA that has the non-cancer allele.]



Feature 2: Consumables Kit

[Instructions: Summarize how the consumables will be packaged in your kit. You may add a schematic image. An image is OPTIONAL and will not get bonus points, but it will make your report look awesome and easy to score.] Description of image


A major weakness we found was the SYBR green solution that was hypersensitive to light. This hypersensitivity caused skewed results due to the solution bleaching out in a short period of time. A way to address this problem is to make our micro test tubes black. In the original trial, the test tubes were clear; allowing light to penetrate through and bleach the SYBR green solution. If the test tubes where blacked out this could assist with slowing down the bleaching process of the SYBR green solution.

Feature 3: PCR Machine Hardware

[Instructions: Summarize how you will include the PCR machine in your system. You may add a schematic image. An image is OPTIONAL and will not get bonus points, but it will make your report look really awesome and easy to score.]

It was noted that one of the weakness for the PCR machine was that it didn't have a way of logging/recorded data, during the time that the machine was running. Our team is going to address this problem by creating a communication connection between the data of the PCR machine to a computer. We will be doing this by adding a logging program and USB connection to the PCR machine that will automatically start and record all data being given off by the PCR machine.

Feature 4: Fluorimeter Hardware

[Instructions: Summarize how you will include the fluorimeter in your system. You may add a schematic image. An image is OPTIONAL and will not get bonus points, but it will make your report look really REALLY awesome and easy to score.]

[Instructions: IF your group has decided to redesign the fluorimeter to address any major weakness discussed by your group or mentioned by others (see the Virtual Comment Board Powerpoint files on Blackboard, Lab Week 12) explain how in an additional paragraph.]


One design flaw with the fluorimeter was the stand used to hold the phone. The stand was not very stable with the model of phone we were using. This unstable base allowed the phone to move around between trials causing variations in the pictures taken for analysis. If the stand was redesigned in a way that would make it universal to all phones, then it would be much more user-friendly to everyone. This would be an easy fix that would greatly improve the functionality of this device with all models of phones.


Bonus Opportunity: What Bayesian Stats Imply About The BME100 Diagnostic Approach

The percent value for calculation 3 is very small, telling us that the prediction of the cancer disease development is not very sensitive. Sensitivity tells us the probability of revealing that a person has cancer. This informs us of the probability that the person has the disease is given a positive test. The percent value for calculation 4 is close to one , telling us that the prediction of the cancer disease development is very specific. Specificity tells us the probability of revealing that a person does not have caner.

[Instructions: This section is OPTIONAL, and will get bonus points if answered thoroughly and correctly. Here is a chance to flex some intellectual muscle. In your own words, discuss what the results for calculations 3 and 4 imply about the reliability of CHEK2 PCR for predicting cancer. Please do NOT type the actual numerical values here. Just refer to them as being "less than one" or "very small." The instructors will ask you to submit your actual calculations via e-mail. We are doing so for the sake of academic integrity and to curb any temptation to cheat.]