BME100 f2015:Group16 8amL6: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 47: Line 47:
'''TinkerCAD'''<br>
'''TinkerCAD'''<br>
<!-- Instructions: Write a short summary (four to ten sentences) of the TinkerCAD tool and how you used it during the Computer-Aided Design lab. If you have had any experience with Solid Works you may compare TinkerCAD to Solid Works in your summary. If not, do not include any discussion about Solid Works. -->
<!-- Instructions: Write a short summary (four to ten sentences) of the TinkerCAD tool and how you used it during the Computer-Aided Design lab. If you have had any experience with Solid Works you may compare TinkerCAD to Solid Works in your summary. If not, do not include any discussion about Solid Works. -->
 
A few members of our team have experience using Solid Works and all agree TinkerCAD is a lot more user friendly. I major difference is how in TinkerCAD you can simply drag the peices to scale where in solid works you have to input every measurement. The open designs in TinkerCAD are also really useful because you don't have to be an expert to make a more detailed design as peices are already made for you. Overall TinkerCAD was easy to work with and we were able to create an accurate depiction of our design.


'''Our Design'''<br>
'''Our Design'''<br>


<!-- Instructions: Show an image of your TinkerCAD design here. -->
<!-- Instructions: Show an image of your TinkerCAD design here. -->


<!-- Instructions: Under the image, describe your design. Why did you choose this design? How is it different from the original OpenPCR design? --><br>
<!-- Instructions: Under the image, describe your design. Why did you choose this design? How is it different from the original OpenPCR design? --><br>

Revision as of 23:07, 24 November 2015

BME 100 Fall 2015 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help


OUR COMPANY

Name: Ryan Pan
Name: Patrick Hogan
Name: Nicholas Torres
Name: Christy Goudamanis
Name: Erin - Shea Warner
Name: Jessica Arroyo



LAB 6 WRITE-UP

Bayesian Statistics

Overview of the Original Diagnosis System


What Bayes Statistics Imply about This Diagnostic Approach


Three possible sources of human or machine errors is mix up of the test tubes when they were being labeled and handled between lab days. Another error that could have happened could be when transferring the images to imagej they were mixed up and that was due to us and not having a better system to transfer the photos. The last possible source of error could have happened when we were taking the PCR and not inserting the right fluid into the fluorimeter. All of these could have affected the Bayes values in a negative way either by giving us the wrong value of by having the wrong calculations in the wrong area.

Intro to Computer-Aided Design

TinkerCAD
A few members of our team have experience using Solid Works and all agree TinkerCAD is a lot more user friendly. I major difference is how in TinkerCAD you can simply drag the peices to scale where in solid works you have to input every measurement. The open designs in TinkerCAD are also really useful because you don't have to be an expert to make a more detailed design as peices are already made for you. Overall TinkerCAD was easy to work with and we were able to create an accurate depiction of our design.

Our Design





Feature 1: Consumables

Very important means that there consumables are essential in the kits and may not be able to be replaced by something else. In our kit the PCR machine, PCR mix, primer solution, SYBR Green solution, buffer, tubes, and glass slides. All this would be individual packaged so they may be sold separately. This is no different then a regular kit because we didn't change the PCR machine we changed a part of the fluorimeter. Our consumables packaging plan addresses a major weakness of needed to package everything separately this is due to needing to not break anything. This can be fixed through selling the PCR machine separate from the other parts.

Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter

We will be including the open PCR in our system, but we changed the stand part of the Fluorimeter where a phone is placed. This type of hardware will be utilized for people to change the degree of the phone to be able to achieve the right angle. This changes the way the phone can take the picture and receive the right light to receive the oval shape of the droplet located on the slide. This is used to fix the problem to only have the black background and the droplet. This hardware will help in lowering the possible error of not having enough of the droplet by fixing the angle view of the droplet. The major weakness of the fluorimeter that we used was having trouble to keep the same anglel for each picture with the phone stand given to us. This was due to the fact that the stand was not the right fix for the phone that we were using. Another major weakness that we encountered was having to zoom in the picture because the phone was not close enough to the droplet. Both of these caused us to have problems when taking the picture.