BME100 f2015:Group9 1030amL6: Difference between revisions
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Place''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Place''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Customers who buy our product are buying a better functioning fluorimeter that enables the user to take better image data so more accurate conclusions can be made||What makes our product special is that it is more versatile with angles and accuracy in taking pictures that will be used as data for conclusions||...||...||...|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 23:49, 24 November 2015
BME 100 Fall 2015 | Home People Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3 Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6 Course Logistics For Instructors Photos Wiki Editing Help | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OUR COMPANY
LAB 6 WRITE-UPBayesian StatisticsOverview of the Original Diagnosis System
Calculation 1
Calculation 2
Calculation 3
Calculation 4
What Bayes Statistics Imply about This Diagnostic Approach
On the other hand, In calculation 2 it describes the probability that given a negative PCR reaction, a patient will receive a negative final test conclusion. Since that probability is close to 90%, this shows that the PCR machine is better manufactured at not detecting a disease SNP rather than vise versa. Due to the fact that this value is closer to 100% makes the machine more reliable, however as stated prior, it is not 100% accurate.
Regarding calculation 3, because the Bayes value is close to 30% and is less than 50% accurate, the ability of the PCR to diagnose and predict the development of the disease is not high. This result shows that although the PCR has a higher chance of detecting a disease SNP, it has a lower chance of diagnosis since other facts beyond it’s control can detect proper diagnosis. In calculation 4, the Bayes value is close to 40% and similar to calculation 3, it is below 50% which further shows that the ability for the PCR to predict the development of the disease is not accurate.
Intro to Computer-Aided DesignTinkerCAD Using TinkerCad was relatively simple after following the step by step tutorials that showcase all the tools possible. TinkerCad is user-friendly and despite being simple, had a variety of options in order to create different things. The first thing we did was follow the tutorial in order to understand the different tools such as zooming, the shapes, and grouping shapes together. After the tutorial, we downloaded Dr. Haynes files in order to begin redesigning the fluorimeter. Dr. Haynes files were much better suited for this particular lab compared to the basic tools given, however, when we were redesigning the fluorimeter so that the camera phone can take better images for data, the other shapes became useful. During the Computer-Aided Design we tried out different options and settled on creating a very mobile attachment to the fluorimeter so that the phone can get the best angle of the data. We used several shapes in order to complete the finished product. It was a bit difficult at first because if the shape is too big, it was hard viewing the whole device when the screen only showed so much.
Our design keeps the basic box-shape of the fluorimeter, however, we have added an attachment (colorful portion) that makes taking down data much easier. The slider, which is in pastel pink, slides in and out of the fluorimeter in order to get as close as needed to the data that is being collected. The purpose of the sliding mechanism is to prevent the user from taking the phone out of the cradle constantly, and enable more mobile movement without disrupting anything. The light blue circles enable rotating ability of the attachment for more movement as well, and similar to a "selfie stick" the blue rod extends when needed in order to optimize the best viewing option. Finally, the light purple portion is where the phone is, and the difference from the OpenPCR design and this is that this design works like a clamp in order to secure the phone steady. On the other hand, in the OpenPCR lab, the cradle was unstable and the phone constantly fell or changed direction with slight movement which is why we opted for a design where we are able to position the phone and keep it at that position without it being moved.
Feature 1: Consumables
Feature 2: Hardware - PCR Machine & Fluorimeter
|