BME100 f2016:Projects2: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
'''PART 1: ASSIGNMENT '''<br><br>
'''PART 1: ASSIGNMENT '''<br><br>
1. Design and draw your prototype in '''SolidWorks'''.  Upload as an image and provide a brief description (including how addresses health issue) on Open Wet Ware.<br><br>
1. Design and draw your prototype in '''SolidWorks'''.  Upload as an image and provide a brief description (including how addresses health issue) on Open Wet Ware.<br><br>
[[Image:Glass Frame.jpg]]
 


2. Determine the '''technical feasibility '''of your design.  Include answers to the following questions:<br>
2. Determine the '''technical feasibility '''of your design.  Include answers to the following questions:<br>
Line 27: Line 27:


a. What are the technologies needed?  
a. What are the technologies needed?  
The technologies needed for our glasses include two very small cameras that can automatically connect to wifi to a smartphone and can also record and store video within the glasses, we need durable frames that can withstand high heat and extreme cold and that are also lightweight. We also need to build an app in a smartphone so we can change setting in the glasses such as brightness. We need to also create custom lenses for every pair of glasses because everyone has a different prescription and the lenses need to be durable.
 
b. What are the challenges? <br>
b. What are the challenges? <br>


The challenges for making this device include finding the technology needed because the technology possibly may not exist. Another challenge is making the glasses lightweight enough for the consumers. Another challenge would be making the app for the glasses because that would include extra software and programming.
 
c. What could go wrong? <br><br>
c. What could go wrong? <br><br>


The small cameras may not work as previously thought because they might not capture a wide enough field of vision or connect to wifi freely, without interruption. The frames could break if they are not made correctly or made out of a brittle material. The smartphone app may not be able to effectively change the settings as seen through the glasses themselves.


3. Determine the '''clinical feasibility'''.<br>
3. Determine the '''clinical feasibility'''.<br>
a. Will it work in the clinic?<br>
a. Will it work in the clinic?<br>


The product would work in a clinic because there are many visually impaired people in the United States that would be able to test this device and give feedback.
 


b. What are the clinical risks?<br>
b. What are the clinical risks?<br>


The clinical risks are the glasses might put stress and pressure on the bridge of the nose, and changing the settings of the glasses might malevolently harm the wearer's sight.
 


c. Have similar products been in a clinical trial?  How long was the trial?<br><br>
c. Have similar products been in a clinical trial?  How long was the trial?<br><br>


There have been similar products in a clinical trial before such as Google Glass and since Google Glass is a marketable and buy-able device, the FDA has deemed it safe for the public. The trial for Google Glass lasted approximately 3 years before it became available to the public.
 
   
   
4. Using the '''fundability worksheet chart''', determine the '''scores''' (0-3) for technical feasibility and clinical feasibility and provide support for scores.<br><br>
4. Using the '''fundability worksheet chart''', determine the '''scores''' (0-3) for technical feasibility and clinical feasibility and provide support for scores.<br><br>


The score for clinical feasibility would be a two because similar products have been released such as Google Glass but the wearable computer field in medical devices is very experimental and there is still an ample amount of research needed to really solidify the technology. The score for technical feasibility would be a one because the technology needed to fully build this device is still experimental and making the parts work with each other such as camera to glasses to smartphone communication would be difficult.
 


'''Resources: '''<br><br>
'''Resources: '''<br><br>

Revision as of 08:37, 14 September 2016

BME 100 Fall 2016 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3
Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help

Lab 2: “Prototype Design”

PART 1: LEARNING OBJECTIVES:

  • Learn how to use SolidWorks: Leverage “Help” in SolidWorks and Custom video on Blackboard.
  • Design a prototype to address the chosen health issue.
  • Draw prototype in SolidWorks.
  • Determine the technical feasibility.
  • Determine the clinical feasibility.

PART 1: ASSIGNMENT

1. Design and draw your prototype in SolidWorks. Upload as an image and provide a brief description (including how addresses health issue) on Open Wet Ware.


2. Determine the technical feasibility of your design. Include answers to the following questions:
a. What are the technologies needed?

a. What are the technologies needed?

b. What are the challenges?


c. What could go wrong?


3. Determine the clinical feasibility.
a. Will it work in the clinic?


b. What are the clinical risks?


c. Have similar products been in a clinical trial? How long was the trial?


4. Using the fundability worksheet chart, determine the scores (0-3) for technical feasibility and clinical feasibility and provide support for scores.


Resources:

- Video on the basics of SolidWorks (on Bb)
- Video on how to search for clinical trial information: See “Improving Searches with Boolean Operators” Video to learn about ClinicalTrials.gov (on Bb)

PART 2: LEARNING OBJECTIVES:

  • Determine the market size.
  • Determine fundability.

PART 2: ASSIGNMENT:

1. What value does your prototype create for the customer?
2. Determine the cost to create your design. Justify.
3. What would be the anticipated average sale price (ASP)? Justify.
4. Using initial market size analysis in Lab 1, determine the market size in dollars per year.
5. Using the fundability worksheet, determine if your prototype should be funded. Justify why or why not.

HW: Lab Report 2 (due 09/20/16 at 11:59PM through OpenWetWare)

Grading Scheme:
50 points – See Rubric
50 points – Peer Assessment

Rubric:

Lab 2 Rubric

Look for your Group's lab report link in the list of links on the right. If it is RED instead of blue, DO NOT CLICK ON IT!

If the link is red, type the name of your Group's lab report link exactly as shown in the following text field and click the Create Page button.

This should open up an Edit page that is pre-populated with a lab report template code.

<createbox> preload=Template:ASUBME100_f2016_L2 prefix=BME100_f2016: width=25 buttonlabel=Create Page </createbox>

Group1_W8AM_L2 Group2_W8AM_L2 Group3_W8AM_L2 Group4_W8AM_L2 Group5_W8AM_L2
Group6_W8AM_L2 Group7_W8AM_L2 Group8_W8AM_L2 Group9_W8AM_L2 Group10_W8AM_L2
Group11_W8AM_L2 Group12_W8AM_L2 Group13_W8AM_L2 Group14_W8AM_L2 Group15_W8AM_L2
Group16_W8AM_L2 Test_W8AM_L2
 
Group1_W1030AM_L2 Group2_W1030AM_L2 Group3_W1030AM_L2 Group4_W1030AM_L2 Group5_W1030AM_L2
Group6_W1030AM_L2 Group7_W1030AM_L2 Group8_W1030AM_L2 Group9_W1030AM_L2 Group10_W1030AM_L2
Group11_W1030AM_L2 Group12_W1030AM_L2 Group13_W1030AM_L2 Group14_W1030AM_L2 Group15_W1030AM_L2
Group16_W1030AM_L2 Test_W1030AM_L2




Retrieved from "https://openwetware.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=BME100_f2016:Projects2&oldid=952442"