BME100 f2017:Group10 W0800 L2: Difference between revisions
Jacob Morris (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
3. Determine the clinical feasibility: | 3. Determine the clinical feasibility: | ||
A)Given the technical feasibility of the design, it should be fairly simple to implement in the clinical setting. However, like mentioned earlier, there is a | A)Given the technical feasibility of the design, it should be fairly simple to implement in the clinical setting. However, like mentioned earlier, there is a chance that something may go wrong and potentially harm the patient. An issue that needs to be addressed is how to isolate the charge entering the body so that it only affects the targeted area of the brain and doesn't affect other bodily functions like movement and speech. Another obstacle to overcome is regulating the strength of the charge to the individual needs of the patient. Because this design uses an adhesive to stick to the skin surrounding the spine, it is much less invasive than traditional methods of treatment like surgery. | ||
B) Any time a treatment is conducted that includes deep brain stimulation therapies there are always possible risks that can affect a patient. For instance, the complications in some cases include: Sweating, Nausea, and skin irritation due to the sticky pads. Some of the lesser side effects are, insomnia , shortness of breath, slowing of the heart rate. More complicated side effects include electrical shock, memory loss, and stroke. | B) Any time a treatment is conducted that includes deep brain stimulation therapies there are always possible risks that can affect a patient. For instance, the complications in some cases include: Sweating, Nausea, and skin irritation due to the sticky pads. Some of the lesser side effects are, insomnia , shortness of breath, slowing of the heart rate. More complicated side effects include electrical shock, memory loss, and stroke. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
'''Fundability Worksheet Chart '''<br><br> | '''Fundability Worksheet Chart '''<br><br> | ||
According to the Fundability Worksheet Chart, our design would score a 2 in technical feasibility. Although most components of our device would be fairly simple to construct, there might be an issue when trying to implement the right type of metal into the conducting system. However, with a bit of research and experimentation, this can be done. As far as clinical feasibility, a | According to the Fundability Worksheet Chart, our design would score a 2 in technical feasibility. Although most components of our device would be fairly simple to construct, there might be an issue when trying to implement the right type of metal into the conducting system. However, with a bit of research and experimentation, this can be done. As far as clinical feasibility, our device would score between a 1 and 2 because there is a risk that the charge would not be delivered to the designated area of the brain and could potentially harm the patient. Although this could be researched and tested, this could be a timely and costly process. Additionally, in order to correctly use this device, the clinician should have a clear understanding of circuits and voltage and be able to identify potential risks the patient might have regarding this type of treatment. | ||
=Part 2: Assignment= | =Part 2: Assignment= | ||
1. Our product provides an easily accessible and convenient route to managing anxiety and depression-like systems. Because it is so small ( 1 inch X 1/2 inch X 1/10 inch) and goes on with an adhesive strip, it is easy to hide and doesn't interfere with the patient's daily activities. | 1. Our product provides an easily accessible and convenient route to managing anxiety and depression-like systems. Because it is so small ( 1 inch X 1/2 inch X 1/10 inch) and goes on with an adhesive strip, it is easy to hide and doesn't interfere with the patient's daily activities. | ||
Revision as of 12:01, 17 September 2017
Lab 2: Prototype Design
Part 1: Assignment
Prototype Design
2. Determine the technical feasibility of your design. Include answers to the following questions:
The overall technical feasibility of our design is very good because of the fact that the technology needed to produce our product has been around for a very long time. The technology needed to make our product would be two insulators and a conductive plate that fits in between. There would also have to be little tiny conductors on one insulator which allows the charge to flow throughout the circuit when needed. The circuit that would be needed would need multiple voltmeters to sense when the capacitor has discharged. The hardest technology to obtain for our product would be a type of metal that would contain a lot of charge, enough to stimulate the brain without being put on the brain, as well as not hurting the patient. The main The technology needed would just be the same basic technology for your generic circuit and capacitor. The biggest challenge would be stimulating the brain chemically without being invasive and as well as letting the electricity flow directly to the brain and not throughout the entire body. Due to the fact that we have not tested our product the chance that something could go wrong is high. One possibility could be that the client could be shocked or given a seizure due to too much electrical stimulation in the brain.
3. Determine the clinical feasibility:
A)Given the technical feasibility of the design, it should be fairly simple to implement in the clinical setting. However, like mentioned earlier, there is a chance that something may go wrong and potentially harm the patient. An issue that needs to be addressed is how to isolate the charge entering the body so that it only affects the targeted area of the brain and doesn't affect other bodily functions like movement and speech. Another obstacle to overcome is regulating the strength of the charge to the individual needs of the patient. Because this design uses an adhesive to stick to the skin surrounding the spine, it is much less invasive than traditional methods of treatment like surgery.
B) Any time a treatment is conducted that includes deep brain stimulation therapies there are always possible risks that can affect a patient. For instance, the complications in some cases include: Sweating, Nausea, and skin irritation due to the sticky pads. Some of the lesser side effects are, insomnia , shortness of breath, slowing of the heart rate. More complicated side effects include electrical shock, memory loss, and stroke.
Determine the Cost to Create Your Design.
The over all cost to create our design would be at least ten dollars. This is the amount we came up mathematically because of the fact that the cost of the circuitry throughout the product was around $3.63. Our product would need at least three times the amount of circuitry which would make the cost around ten dollars. This does not account for the material that we would need to store the insane amount of charge. We can not determine the cost amount of this material because we do not know if it exists or not.
What is the Average Sale Price?
The average sales price would be around $50 because of the fact that we wanted it to cost at least five times the amount to make it.
Technical Feasibility
Clinical Feasibility
Fundability Worksheet Chart
According to the Fundability Worksheet Chart, our design would score a 2 in technical feasibility. Although most components of our device would be fairly simple to construct, there might be an issue when trying to implement the right type of metal into the conducting system. However, with a bit of research and experimentation, this can be done. As far as clinical feasibility, our device would score between a 1 and 2 because there is a risk that the charge would not be delivered to the designated area of the brain and could potentially harm the patient. Although this could be researched and tested, this could be a timely and costly process. Additionally, in order to correctly use this device, the clinician should have a clear understanding of circuits and voltage and be able to identify potential risks the patient might have regarding this type of treatment.
Part 2: Assignment
1. Our product provides an easily accessible and convenient route to managing anxiety and depression-like systems. Because it is so small ( 1 inch X 1/2 inch X 1/10 inch) and goes on with an adhesive strip, it is easy to hide and doesn't interfere with the patient's daily activities.
