BME100 s2017:Group5 W8AM L3: Difference between revisions
(12 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|- valign="top" | |- valign="top" | ||
| [[Image: | | [[Image:BME100studentLP.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Luis Paez]] | ||
| [[Image: | | [[Image:BME100studentAA.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Anisa Ahamed]] | ||
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Matthew Grudza]] | | [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Matthew Grudza]] | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Fernanda Nunez]] | | [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Fernanda Nunez]] | ||
| [[Image: | | [[Image:BME100studentJF.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Jenna Forrey]] | ||
| [[Image: | | [[Image:BME100studentSG.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Smita Gopalakrishnan]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<u>Graph I: Average and Standard Deviation for Heart Rate Measures of Gold Standard and Spree</u> <br> | <u>Graph I: Average and Standard Deviation for Heart Rate Measures of Gold Standard and Spree</u> <br> | ||
[[Image:BME | [[Image:BME 100_AvgHeartRate3.jpg|400px|Description of image]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<u>Graph II: Average and Standard Deviation for Temperature Measures of Gold Standard and Sprees</u> <br> | <u>Graph II: Average and Standard Deviation for Temperature Measures of Gold Standard and Sprees</u> <br> | ||
[[Image:BME 100_AvgTemp.jpg| | [[Image:BME 100_AvgTemp.jpg|400px|Description of image]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
==Inferential Stats== | ==Inferential Stats== | ||
<u>'''Heart Rate:'''</u> | <u>'''Heart Rate:'''</u> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
'''Paired T-Test:''' 0.427 > 0.05 | '''Paired T-Test:''' 0.427 > 0.05 | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 103: | Line 102: | ||
<br> <br> | <br> <br> | ||
<u>'''Temperature:'''</u> | <u>'''Temperature:'''</u> | ||
<br> | |||
'''Paired T-Test:''' 1.097E-21 < 0.05 | '''Paired T-Test:''' 1.097E-21 < 0.05 | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 115: | Line 114: | ||
==Design Flaws and Recommendations== | ==Design Flaws and Recommendations== | ||
One of the flaws of this design was that the products did not have consistent accuracy. The data collected had a couple of blank spots for both the Gold Standard and Spree Headband, displaying that the product failed to produce accurate results many times. This was especially prevalent with the Spree device and its the temperature readings. To improve this, these devices could develop more advanced technology for measuring heart rate and temperature. | |||
<br> | |||
==Experimental Design of Own Device== | ==Experimental Design of Own Device== |
Latest revision as of 00:01, 22 February 2017
BME 100 Spring 2017 | Home People Lab Write-Up 1 | Lab Write-Up 2 | Lab Write-Up 3 Lab Write-Up 4 | Lab Write-Up 5 | Lab Write-Up 6 Course Logistics For Instructors Photos Wiki Editing Help | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OUR TEAMLAB 3 WRITE-UPDescriptive Stats and GraphHeart Rate:
Graph I: Average and Standard Deviation for Heart Rate Measures of Gold Standard and Spree Table I: Average, Standard Deviation, and p-value Calculations for Heart Rate Data
Results Analysis
Graph II: Average and Standard Deviation for Temperature Measures of Gold Standard and Sprees Table II: Average, Standard Deviation, and p-value Calculations for Temperature Calculations
Results Analysis
Inferential StatsHeart Rate:
Temperature:
Design Flaws and RecommendationsOne of the flaws of this design was that the products did not have consistent accuracy. The data collected had a couple of blank spots for both the Gold Standard and Spree Headband, displaying that the product failed to produce accurate results many times. This was especially prevalent with the Spree device and its the temperature readings. To improve this, these devices could develop more advanced technology for measuring heart rate and temperature.
Experimental Design of Own DeviceExperimental Design The HIV-positive patients tested should have positive results. The HIV-negative patients should have negative results. In order for the experiment to be deemed as successful, the accuracy of the device should be precise and reliable with the already known diagnosis of the patient. Ideally, the standard deviation of the patient data in both groups should show a lower value, indicating the close spreading of the values compared to the mean value. This will show more consistency in the measurements taken by the device. The student test should yield a result lower than 0.05, indicating that the statistical difference between the control and the testing group is 95% different. This will indicate the device is diagnosing properly and therefore will elevate the confidence in the accuracy of the diagnose. Lastly, the Pearson’s coefficient should yield a value close to -1, indicating a negative correlation between both groups, as it is expected since they should yield different binary results.
|