BME103 s2013:T900 Group5 L3: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Cody Gates <br> Camera Operator]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Cody Gates <br> Camera Operator]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Alexander Oropel<br> Research and Development Scientist]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Alexander Oropel<br> Research and Development Scientist]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Matt McClintock <br> Protocol]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Matt McClintock <br> Data Analyzer/Protocol ]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Student<br>Role(s)]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Heewon Park<br> Machine/ Device Engineering
]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Student<br>Role(s)]]
| [[Image:BME103student.jpg|100px|thumb|Name: Student<br>Role(s)]]
|}
|}
Line 30: Line 31:
| Sample Name || Ave. INTDEN* || Calculated μg/mL || Conclusion (pos/neg)
| Sample Name || Ave. INTDEN* || Calculated μg/mL || Conclusion (pos/neg)
|-
|-
| Positive Control || --- || --- ||  N/A
| Positive Control || 5725984.00 || 11.66 μg/mL ||  N/A
|-
|-
| Negative Control || --- || ---|| N/A
| Negative Control || 2820659.67 || 4.50 μg/mL || N/A
|-
|-
| Tube Label:___ Patient ID: ____ rep 1 || --- ||  ---  ||  ---
| Tube Label: 1 Patient ID: 92336 rep 1 || 4902761.33 ||  9.63 μg/mL ||  pos
|-
|-
| Tube Label:___ Patient ID: ____ rep 2 || --- ||  --- ||  ---
| Tube Label: 2 Patient ID: 92336 rep 2 || 4957051.00 ||  9.77 μg/mL ||  pos
|-
|-
| Tube Label:___ Patient ID: ____ rep 3 || --- ||  --- ||  ---
| Tube Label: 3 Patient ID: 92336 rep 3 || 5446934.67 ||  10.93 μg/mL ||  pos
|-
|-
| Tube Label:___ Patient ID: ____ rep 1 || --- ||  --- ||  ---
| Tube Label: 4 Patient ID: 44606 rep 1 || 2497338.33 ||  3.70 μg/mL ||  neg
|-
|-
| Tube Label:___ Patient ID: ____ rep 2 || --- ||  --- ||  ---
| Tube Label: 5 Patient ID: 44606 rep 2 || 2202675.67 ||  2.97 μg/mL ||  neg
|-
|-
| Tube Label:___ Patient ID: ____ rep 3 || --- ||  --- ||  ---
| Tube Label: 6 Patient ID: 44606 rep 3 || 1789569.00 ||  1.95 μg/mL ||  neg
|}
|}
<nowiki>* Ave. INTDEN = Average of ImageJ integrated density values from three Fluorimeter images</nowiki>
<nowiki>* Ave. INTDEN = Average of ImageJ integrated density values from three Fluorimeter images</nowiki>
Line 91: Line 92:
<!--The whole team is responsible for completing this section. This is where you get to express/ argue why certain aspects fall under Must Have, Want, Must Not Have, or Should Avoid. List the two aspects that your team picked from each category in class. You are allowed to create new aspects, as long as they are relevant to your new design.-->
<!--The whole team is responsible for completing this section. This is where you get to express/ argue why certain aspects fall under Must Have, Want, Must Not Have, or Should Avoid. List the two aspects that your team picked from each category in class. You are allowed to create new aspects, as long as they are relevant to your new design.-->


'''We concluded that a good system ''Must Have'':'''
'''We concluded that a good system "Must Have":'''
* [Must have #1 - why? short, ~4 or 5 sentences]
* Results that are easy to determine. This means a clear indication of positive or negative results when compared to the controls. This is integral to the design success because the results must be easy differentiable as to not require re-testing.
* [Must have #2 - why? short, ~4 or 5 sentences]
* Software that is simple to use. The software for open PCR is incredibly easy to use and a program similar would be ideal. Anything that requires computer coding or computational design is too complicated, so the software must already be made to use. A user should be able to plug in the information he or she wants and get the desired response from the software, no computing needed.




'''We concluded that we would ''Want'' a good system to have:'''
'''We concluded that we would ''Want'' a good system to have:'''
* [Want #1 - why? short, ~4 or 5 sentences]
* Samples that are easily identifiable throughout the experiment. This means that there is no changing of labels or titles for the samples. This is important because it is crucial to keep the samples consistent and not mixed up. When transferring the samples there should be prepared labels to keep them straight.
* [Want #2 - why? short, ~4 or 5 sentences]
* Accessibility. This means that anyone can access the materials needed and replicate the findings. For the purpose of DNA amplification no advanced technology is required, the PCR machine is easy for anyone to access.




'''We concluded that a good system ''Must Not Have'':'''
'''We concluded that a good system ''Must Not Have'':'''
* [Must Not Have #1 - why? short, ~4 or 5 sentences]
* High cost. This means that the system must not be too expensive. This is important because the system should be replicable and useful to everyone. 
* [Must Not Have #2 - why? short, ~4 or 5 sentences]
* inconsistent timing. This was the most annoying problem with the original PCR design. The PCR machine kept changing times, and the group was unsure if the amplification was taking place properly. This also made it impossible to gauge the rest of the experiment timing which delayed the experiment and forced the group to reschedule further testing.
 


'''We concluded that a good system ''Should Avoid'':'''
'''We concluded that a good system ''Should Avoid'':'''
* [Should Avoid #1 - why? short, ~4 or 5 sentences]
* High energy consumption. Possible options are a battery or solar power. Not only would this make the experiment accesible at any location, it is a more sustainable option.
* [Should Avoid #2 - why? short, ~4 or 5 sentences]
* Manual analysis of the images. This was the most tedious process of the experiment. ImageJ was useful in providing a medium for calculating light density, but a program that could do calculations on its own would be ideal.




Line 114: Line 114:


==New System: Machine/ Device Engineering==
==New System: Machine/ Device Engineering==
<!-- This is the Machine operator's section -->
Rather than consuming loads amount of energy with the PCR's technology, our new PCR will be solar battery powered.
 


'''SYSTEM DESIGN'''<br>
'''SYSTEM DESIGN'''<br>


<!-- If your design goals include modifying the Open PCR machine, include an image or images from the Open PCR Solid Works 3D rendering exercise. Write a short paragraph that summarizes what your team is going to modify -->
http://i47.tinypic.com/65tt9e.jpg <br>
<!-- If your goal includes modifying the Fluorimeter, include a labeled image or images of the Fluorimeter. There is no Solid Works file for the Fluorimeter. Write a short paragraph that summarizes what your team is going to modify -->
http://i50.tinypic.com/35m42s8.jpg<br>
<!-- If your goal does not require any changes in the machinery/ devices, include labeled images of the OpenPCR machine and the Fluorimeter. Write a short paragraph that summarizes what each one of the machines does -->
 
 
'''KEY FEATURES'''<br>


<!-- If your team decided to change any of the machinery/ devices, summarize the new features here and delete the '''We chose keep the devices the same as the original system''' section. -->
<br>Our PCR will be powered by a removable battery that will be power by the energy provided by the sun. The solar power PCR will be not only be energy efficient, but it will also be cheaper to run, and more accessible. Using this solar power system will also give the PCR more power to run and ultimately give the new PCR more accurate and faster results.
<br>'''KEY FEATURES'''
'''We chose to include these new features'''
'''We chose to include these new features'''
* Feature 1 - explanation of how this addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
* Solar Battery - A removable solar battery that can be placed in the sun for hours at a time to receive energy for the PCR. This solar powered battery will create 10x more energy than a normol plug outlet can provide making the PCR, making the timing for each cycle faster and and more time consistent. The new PCR system will also have a lesser price to its users and will not consume nearly as much energy.
* Feature 2 - explanation of how this addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
* Plug - A area inside the PCR where the solar powered battery can be placed to turn on the PCR. This part will let the PCR be able to intake the great amount of energy that it will receive and and use the energy efficiently.
* Etc.
 
[OR]
 
<!-- If your team decided NOT to change any of the machinery/ devices, explain why here and delete the '''We chose to include these new features''' section above-->
'''We chose keep the devices the same as the original system'''
* Feature 1 - explanation of how a pre-existing feature addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
* Feature 2 - explanation of how a pre-existing feature addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
* Etc.






'''INSTRUCTIONS''' <br>
'''INSTRUCTIONS''' <br>
<!-- Changing the machine will require new instructions for using the machine. Write a short step-by-step list of instructions on how to set up and use the new machine. The instructions must be specific to your new design. -->
1. Plug the solar battery into the plug<br>
<!-- If your team decided not to change any of the machinery/ devices, write a short step-by-step list of instructions on how to set up and use each machine. You may want to consider modifying the instructions to improve ease of use. -->
2. Load into PCR samples into the the PCR plate<br>
 
3. Connect the device into a computer <br>
4. Turn the PCR on<br>
5. Start the computer program the PCR uses<br>




<br><br>
<br><br>


==New System: Protocols==
==New System: Protocols==
Line 157: Line 145:
<!-- If your team decided to change the PCR and/or the Fluorimeter imaging protocols, summarize the new approaches/ features here and delete the '''We chose keep the protocols the same as the original system''' section. -->
<!-- If your team decided to change the PCR and/or the Fluorimeter imaging protocols, summarize the new approaches/ features here and delete the '''We chose keep the protocols the same as the original system''' section. -->
'''We chose to include these new approaches/ features'''
'''We chose to include these new approaches/ features'''
* Feature 1 - explanation of how this addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
* Plastic case - PCRs are normally found in a lab setting where safety is a big issue. Rather that having a wooden shield which is very flammable, the new shield will be be made out of plastic which will make it safer and possibly more cost efficient.
* Feature 2 - explanation of how this addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
* Solar power battery - the new battery will be more cost efficient, collect more power and will be more sustainable.
* Etc.
* Plug inlet - the plug inlet will allow the solar battery plug to go into the PCR and will use the energy that is provided by the battery to be used efficiently.  
 
[OR]


<!-- If your team decided NOT to change any of the machinery/ devices, explain why here and delete the '''We chose to include these new features''' section above-->
'''We chose keep the protocols the same as the original system'''
* Feature 1 - explanation of how a pre-existing feature addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
* Feature 2 - explanation of how a pre-existing feature addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
* Etc.




'''MATERIALS'''
'''MATERIALS'''


<!--- Place your two tables "Supplied in the kit" and "Supplied by User" here --->
Supplied by kit:<br>
dNTPs<br>
Reaction buffers<br>
Taq DNA Polymerase<br>
MgCl2 <br>
<br>
Supplied by Users:<br>
Sample DNA<br>
Forward and Reverse Primers<br>
SYBR Green dye<br>
Solar powered battery<br>




Line 178: Line 169:


* '''PCR Protocol'''
* '''PCR Protocol'''
<!-- Create a step-by-step procedure for setting up and running PCR reactions. Your instructions should include everything from adding reagents to the tubes, to programming the PCR machine and running the reaction.-->
Thermal Cycler Program
# Step 1
 
# Step 2
Stage 1
# Etc.
    95°C for 3 minutes
Stage 2
35 cycles for each of the steps, each cycle will last for 30 seconds
    1)95°C
    2)57°C
    3)72°C
Stage 3
    Final Hold at 4°C
 


* '''DNA Sample Set-up Procedure'''
Step 1
    Insert fully charged battery in to PCR
Step 2
    Prepare PCR Reaction Mix and DNA sample solutions
Step 3
    Using a pipette, add  50μL of the DNA solutions into a labeled tube (tube should correspond with the solution)
Step 4
    Place tubes in the PCR
Step5
    Run the PCR program


* '''DNA Measurement and Analysis Protocol'''
   
<!-- Create a step-by-step procedure for measuring DNA amplification in the PCR reactions. Your instructions should include everything from diluting the samples in SYBR Green, to placing the drops onto the fluorimeter (if your group is using the fluorimeter), to collecting and processing images in Image J. Don't forget to provide instructions on how to set up the calf thymus DNA samples for calibration, and how to convert INTDEN values into concentrations.--->
# Step 1
# Step 2
# Etc.


<br><br>
<br><br>
Line 196: Line 202:
'''BACKGROUND'''
'''BACKGROUND'''


Polymerase chain reaction is the process of amplifying a strand of DNA from a DNA template strand. From here the scientist is capable of amplifying any specific gene they choose. In this research we are targeting the single nucleotide polymorphism that is rs1787996, which contains a single nucleotide variation or SNV.  The CHEK2 gene is essentially a gene that is capable of coding for susceptibility to breast cancer. The relation to SNP is that it is essentially a variation of the CHEK 2 gene that is present within humans, or Homo sapiens. The cancer-related function of the gene is that it essentially changes the base Thymine to Cytosine, changing the normal allele ATT to ACT, which is the cancer related allele.
<!--- A description of the CHEK2 gene, it's associated SNP, and the cancer-related function of the gene. Use the information from your Week 13 worksheet. --->
<!--- A description of the CHEK2 gene, it's associated SNP, and the cancer-related function of the gene. Use the information from your Week 13 worksheet. --->




'''DESIGN'''
'''DESIGN'''




'''Primers for PCR'''<br>
'''Primers for PCR'''<br>
Amplification of cancer-associated DNA
Cancer allele forward primer: 5' TATGTATGCACTGTAAGAGTT
Cancer allele reverse prime: 5' CTAGGAGAGCTGGTAATTTGG
A disease allele will give a PCR product because the primer associated with the process will identify the sequences that will code for cancer. From there the primer will allow for nucleotide bases to be placed in a reverse sequence from the template DNA. Essentially this will continuously amplify the cancerous DNA gene while the PCR process is in effect.
<!-- If your team decided to only amplify cancer-associated DNA, list the "Cancer allele forward primer" sequence and the "Cancer allele reverse primer" sequence. Include a paragraph that explains why a disease allele will give a PCR product and the non-disease allele will not.-->
<!-- If your team decided to only amplify cancer-associated DNA, list the "Cancer allele forward primer" sequence and the "Cancer allele reverse primer" sequence. Include a paragraph that explains why a disease allele will give a PCR product and the non-disease allele will not.-->



Latest revision as of 23:04, 16 April 2013

BME 103 Spring 2013 Home
People
Lab Write-Up 1
Lab Write-Up 2
Lab Write-Up 3
Course Logistics For Instructors
Photos
Wiki Editing Help

OUR TEAM

Name: Cody Gates
Camera Operator
Name: Alexander Oropel
Research and Development Scientist
Name: Matt McClintock
Data Analyzer/Protocol
Name: Heewon Park
Machine/ Device Engineering
Name: Student
Role(s)

LAB 3 WRITE-UP

Original System: PCR Results

PCR Test Results

Sample Name Ave. INTDEN* Calculated μg/mL Conclusion (pos/neg)
Positive Control 5725984.00 11.66 μg/mL N/A
Negative Control 2820659.67 4.50 μg/mL N/A
Tube Label: 1 Patient ID: 92336 rep 1 4902761.33 9.63 μg/mL pos
Tube Label: 2 Patient ID: 92336 rep 2 4957051.00 9.77 μg/mL pos
Tube Label: 3 Patient ID: 92336 rep 3 5446934.67 10.93 μg/mL pos
Tube Label: 4 Patient ID: 44606 rep 1 2497338.33 3.70 μg/mL neg
Tube Label: 5 Patient ID: 44606 rep 2 2202675.67 2.97 μg/mL neg
Tube Label: 6 Patient ID: 44606 rep 3 1789569.00 1.95 μg/mL neg

* Ave. INTDEN = Average of ImageJ integrated density values from three Fluorimeter images


Bayesian Statistics
These following conditional statistics are based upon all of the DNA detection system results that were obtained in the PCR lab for 20 hypothetical patients who were diagnosed as either having cancer or not having cancer.

Bayes Theorem is an equation in probability theory and statistics that relates inverse representations of probabilities concerning two events, or rather, it expresses a degree of change when accounting for evidence. Bayes Theorem is represented as follows:

    P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B)

Which can be read as

    the probability of A given B = (the probability of B given A * the probability of A) / the probability of B

This information will be utilized to determine various probabilities listed below when accounting for the positive/negative values determined by the entire class as well as an outside document listing the actual yes/no cancer diagnosis


Calculation 1: The probability that the sample actually has the cancer DNA sequence, given a positive diagnostic signal.

  • A = Cancer-Positive Conclustion = 9/20 = .45
  • B = Positive PCR Reactions = 26/60 = .433
  • P (B|A) = Positive PCR given cancer Positive conclustion = 11/13 = .846
  • P(A|B) = .879=88%


Calculation 2: The probability that the sample actually has a non-cancer DNA sequence, given a negative diagnostic signal.

  • A = Cancer negative conclustion = 11/20 = .55
  • B = Negative PCR reactions = 17/30 = .567
  • P (B|A) = Negative PCR given cancer-negative conclustion = 16/17 = .94
  • P(A|B) = .911 = 91%


Calculation 3: The probability that the patient will develop cancer, given a cancer DNA sequence.

  • A = "yes" cancer diagnosis = 7/20 = .35
  • B = "positive" test conclusion = 9/20 = .45
  • P (B|A) = Positive given yes = 6/20 = .3
  • P(A|B) = .233 = 23%


Calculation 4: The probability that the patient will not develop cancer, given a non-cancer DNA sequence.

  • A = "no" cancer diagnosis = 13/20 = .65
  • B = "negative" test conclusion = 11/20 = .55
  • P (B|A) = Negative given no = 1/2 = .5
  • P(A|B) = .591 = 59%

New System: Design Strategy

We concluded that a good system "Must Have":

  • Results that are easy to determine. This means a clear indication of positive or negative results when compared to the controls. This is integral to the design success because the results must be easy differentiable as to not require re-testing.
  • Software that is simple to use. The software for open PCR is incredibly easy to use and a program similar would be ideal. Anything that requires computer coding or computational design is too complicated, so the software must already be made to use. A user should be able to plug in the information he or she wants and get the desired response from the software, no computing needed.


We concluded that we would Want a good system to have:

  • Samples that are easily identifiable throughout the experiment. This means that there is no changing of labels or titles for the samples. This is important because it is crucial to keep the samples consistent and not mixed up. When transferring the samples there should be prepared labels to keep them straight.
  • Accessibility. This means that anyone can access the materials needed and replicate the findings. For the purpose of DNA amplification no advanced technology is required, the PCR machine is easy for anyone to access.


We concluded that a good system Must Not Have:

  • High cost. This means that the system must not be too expensive. This is important because the system should be replicable and useful to everyone.
  • inconsistent timing. This was the most annoying problem with the original PCR design. The PCR machine kept changing times, and the group was unsure if the amplification was taking place properly. This also made it impossible to gauge the rest of the experiment timing which delayed the experiment and forced the group to reschedule further testing.

We concluded that a good system Should Avoid:

  • High energy consumption. Possible options are a battery or solar power. Not only would this make the experiment accesible at any location, it is a more sustainable option.
  • Manual analysis of the images. This was the most tedious process of the experiment. ImageJ was useful in providing a medium for calculating light density, but a program that could do calculations on its own would be ideal.




New System: Machine/ Device Engineering

Rather than consuming loads amount of energy with the PCR's technology, our new PCR will be solar battery powered.

SYSTEM DESIGN

http://i47.tinypic.com/65tt9e.jpg
http://i50.tinypic.com/35m42s8.jpg


Our PCR will be powered by a removable battery that will be power by the energy provided by the sun. The solar power PCR will be not only be energy efficient, but it will also be cheaper to run, and more accessible. Using this solar power system will also give the PCR more power to run and ultimately give the new PCR more accurate and faster results.
KEY FEATURES We chose to include these new features

  • Solar Battery - A removable solar battery that can be placed in the sun for hours at a time to receive energy for the PCR. This solar powered battery will create 10x more energy than a normol plug outlet can provide making the PCR, making the timing for each cycle faster and and more time consistent. The new PCR system will also have a lesser price to its users and will not consume nearly as much energy.
  • Plug - A area inside the PCR where the solar powered battery can be placed to turn on the PCR. This part will let the PCR be able to intake the great amount of energy that it will receive and and use the energy efficiently.


INSTRUCTIONS
1. Plug the solar battery into the plug
2. Load into PCR samples into the the PCR plate
3. Connect the device into a computer
4. Turn the PCR on
5. Start the computer program the PCR uses




New System: Protocols

DESIGN

We chose to include these new approaches/ features

  • Plastic case - PCRs are normally found in a lab setting where safety is a big issue. Rather that having a wooden shield which is very flammable, the new shield will be be made out of plastic which will make it safer and possibly more cost efficient.
  • Solar power battery - the new battery will be more cost efficient, collect more power and will be more sustainable.
  • Plug inlet - the plug inlet will allow the solar battery plug to go into the PCR and will use the energy that is provided by the battery to be used efficiently.


MATERIALS

Supplied by kit:
dNTPs
Reaction buffers
Taq DNA Polymerase
MgCl2

Supplied by Users:
Sample DNA
Forward and Reverse Primers
SYBR Green dye
Solar powered battery


PROTOCOLS

  • PCR Protocol

Thermal Cycler Program

Stage 1

   95°C for 3 minutes

Stage 2 35 cycles for each of the steps, each cycle will last for 30 seconds

   1)95°C
   2)57°C
   3)72°C

Stage 3

   Final Hold at 4°C


  • DNA Sample Set-up Procedure

Step 1

   Insert fully charged battery in to PCR

Step 2

   Prepare PCR Reaction Mix and DNA sample solutions

Step 3

   Using a pipette, add  50μL of the DNA solutions into a labeled tube (tube should correspond with the solution)

Step 4

   Place tubes in the PCR

Step5

   Run the PCR program




New System: Research and Development

BACKGROUND

Polymerase chain reaction is the process of amplifying a strand of DNA from a DNA template strand. From here the scientist is capable of amplifying any specific gene they choose. In this research we are targeting the single nucleotide polymorphism that is rs1787996, which contains a single nucleotide variation or SNV. The CHEK2 gene is essentially a gene that is capable of coding for susceptibility to breast cancer. The relation to SNP is that it is essentially a variation of the CHEK 2 gene that is present within humans, or Homo sapiens. The cancer-related function of the gene is that it essentially changes the base Thymine to Cytosine, changing the normal allele ATT to ACT, which is the cancer related allele.


DESIGN


Primers for PCR
Amplification of cancer-associated DNA

Cancer allele forward primer: 5' TATGTATGCACTGTAAGAGTT

Cancer allele reverse prime: 5' CTAGGAGAGCTGGTAATTTGG

A disease allele will give a PCR product because the primer associated with the process will identify the sequences that will code for cancer. From there the primer will allow for nucleotide bases to be placed in a reverse sequence from the template DNA. Essentially this will continuously amplify the cancerous DNA gene while the PCR process is in effect.


Our primers address the following design needs

  • Design specification 1 - explanation of how an aspect of the primers addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
  • Design specification 2 - explanation of how an aspect of the primers addresses any of the specifications in the "New System: Design Strategy" section
  • Etc.




New System: Software

[THIS SECTION IS OPTIONAL. If your team has creative ideas for new software, and new software is a key component included in your new protocols, R&D, or machine design, you may describe it here. You will not receive bonus points, but a solid effort may raise your overall page layout points. If you decide not to propose new software, please delete this entire section, including the ==New System: Software== header.]