BME494 Project Group2: Difference between revisions
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
<br>Note: potential problem with lack of CG clamp and low CG ratio | <br>Note: potential problem with lack of CG clamp and low CG ratio | ||
<br> | <br><br><br> | ||
* '''Key Pre-existing Part''' | * '''Key Pre-existing Part''' | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
<br>It has been shown to function as a sticky adhesive and worked toward a couple products. | <br>It has been shown to function as a sticky adhesive and worked toward a couple products. | ||
<br>Using it in the product functions as a sort of control to verify testing procedures and we plan on evaluating the combined effect of Mefp-1 and Mefp-5. | <br>Using it in the product functions as a sort of control to verify testing procedures and we plan on evaluating the combined effect of Mefp-1 and Mefp-5. | ||
<br> | <br><br><br> | ||
'''Assembly Scheme''' | '''Assembly Scheme''' | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 9 March 2012
Home People Course Projects Course Materials Syllabus Photos Wiki Editing Help
ABSTRACTWithin the foot of the mussel there are five mussel proteins that vary by amount. This varying amount is caused by the differing amounts of DOPA present within the proteins. These proteins are what cause the adhesive properties present within a mussel. What we aimed to do is create a controllable configuration of cells so that adhesion to a surface can be easily toggled.
BACKGROUNDBioadhesives are natural polymeric materials that many organisms, such as mussels, use for their adhesive properties. Bioadhesives have been seen as an excellent alternative to human-made substances as they are very and durable in conjunction with being eco-friendly. In addition, they exhibit properties that allow them to be used in underwater and medical applications which is the main interest of this project.
PROOF OF CONCEPT DESIGN
TESTING
HUMAN PRACTICESOUR TEAM
|