Bacterial transformation

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(References)
(Chemical transformation)
Line 21: Line 21:
[[Chemical transformation buffer comparison]]
[[Chemical transformation buffer comparison]]
 +
 +
Someone should check out the claims of Nishimura90.  [[User:Tk|tk]] 08:58, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
===Electroporation===
===Electroporation===

Revision as of 08:58, 25 September 2007

Back to Protocols

Contents

Introduction

Transformation is the process of introducing foreign DNA (e.g plasmids, BAC) into a bacterium. Bacterial cells into which foreign DNA can be transformed are called competent. Some bacteria are naturally competent (e.g B. subtilis), whereas others such as E. coli are not naturally competent. Non-competent cells can be made competent and then transformed via one of two main approaches; chemical transformation and electroporation.

There are advantages and disadvantages to both transformation methods. In general, chemical transformation is less prone to error and faster however electroporation produces a higher transformation efficiency (fraction of transformed cells that actually uptake the foreign DNA). See Molecular Cloning for a fuller discussion of both approaches.

Protocols

OpenWetWare already has a number of protocols relating to bacterial transformation but more are always welcome.

If you use a variant on one of these protocols please feel free to add a link to your protocol from one of these pages so other users can find a protocol that works for them. Additionally, if anyone uses the Innoe or Hanahan high-efficiency protocols, then please add protocols here.

Chemical transformation

If you plan on doing a chemical transformation, then you should see these pages -

Chemical transformation buffer comparison

Someone should check out the claims of Nishimura90. tk 08:58, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

Electroporation

If you plan on using electroporation, then see these pages -

References

  1. isbn:0-87969-577-3. [MolecularCloning]
  2. Hanahan D, Jessee J, and Bloom FR. . pmid:1943786. PubMed HubMed [Hanahan91]
  3. Nishimura A, Morita M, Nishimura Y, and Sugino Y. . pmid:2235524. PubMed HubMed [Nishimura90]
  4. US Patent 4,851,348 Media:pat4851348.pdf [Hanahan89]
  5. US Patent 4,981,797 Media:pat4981797.pdf [Jessee90]
  6. US Patent 6,247,369 Media:pat6274369.pdf [Donahue01]
  7. US Patent 6,706,525 Media:pat6706525.pdf [Greenr04]
  8. US Patent 6,709,854 Media:Pat6709854.pdf [Donahue04]
  9. US Patent 6,709,852 Media:pat6709852.pdf [Bloom04]
  10. US Patent 6,855,494 Media:pat6855494.pdf [Bloom05]
  11. US Patent 6,960,464 Media:pat6960464.pdf [Jessee05]
All Medline abstracts: PubMed HubMed
Personal tools