Biogang:Discussion/UniqueAuthorID: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
* [http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1620 Nodalpoint discussion from a while back]
* [http://www.nodalpoint.org/node/1620 Nodalpoint discussion from a while back]
* [http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2009/01/20/a-specialist-openid-service-to-provide-unique-researcher-ids/ a-specialist-openid-service-to-provide-unique-researcher-ids]
* [http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2009/01/20/a-specialist-openid-service-to-provide-unique-researcher-ids/ a-specialist-openid-service-to-provide-unique-researcher-ids]
* [http://www.plos.org/cms/node/133 Unique Author Identification]  
* [http://www.plos.org/cms/node/133 Unique Author Identification]
* [http://www.europenscience.org/?p=30 European scientists need a digital author identifier]
 
==Publications==
==Publications==
* [http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000247 I Am Not a Scientist, I Am a Number] Bourne PE, Fink JL (2008) I Am Not a Scientist, I Am a Number. PLoS Comput Biol 4(12): e1000247. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000247
* [http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000247 I Am Not a Scientist, I Am a Number] Bourne PE, Fink JL (2008) I Am Not a Scientist, I Am a Number. PLoS Comput Biol 4(12): e1000247. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000247

Revision as of 14:44, 20 January 2009

About unique author ID.

FriendFeeds

Blog Post

Publications

WWW