Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/Project: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:DeoxyriboNucleicAwesomeHeader}}
{{Template:DeoxyriboNucleicAwesomeHeader}}
=Project Design =
__TOC__
__TOC__


=Project Design =
==Project Overview ==
===Project Overview ===
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/ProjectOverview/Project Overview]]''
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/ProjectOverview/Project Overview]]''


Line 12: Line 14:




===Domain Level Design====
==Domain Level Design==
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/Domain Level Project Design|Domain Level Project Design]]''
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/Domain Level Project Design|Domain Level Project Design]]''


Line 20: Line 22:
Overall domain level design is illustrated in figure 1. Following abbreviation will be frequently used: walker [W], walker inhibitor [WI], track 1 [TR1], probe for track 1 [PTR1], track 2 [TR2], probe for track 2 [PTR2], cargo 1 [C1], cargo attacher [CA], probe for cargo attacher [PCA], cargo goal inhibitor [CGI], cargo goal 1 [CG1], probe for cargo goal [PCG], walker goal [WG], and probe for walker goal [PWG].
Overall domain level design is illustrated in figure 1. Following abbreviation will be frequently used: walker [W], walker inhibitor [WI], track 1 [TR1], probe for track 1 [PTR1], track 2 [TR2], probe for track 2 [PTR2], cargo 1 [C1], cargo attacher [CA], probe for cargo attacher [PCA], cargo goal inhibitor [CGI], cargo goal 1 [CG1], probe for cargo goal [PCG], walker goal [WG], and probe for walker goal [PWG].


===Sequence Level Design===
==Sequence Level Design==
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/Sequence Design|Sequence Design]]''
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/Sequence Design|Sequence Design]]''
With our overall design in mind, we must design DNA sequences, down to the base level, which undergo the interactions that we desire, without forming secondary structures and binding in unintended ways. We approach this through a combination of pre-generated noninteracting sequences, and trial-and-error design using NUPACK simulation software.
With our overall design in mind, we must design DNA sequences, down to the base level, which undergo the interactions that we desire, without forming secondary structures and binding in unintended ways. We approach this through a combination of pre-generated noninteracting sequences, and trial-and-error design using NUPACK simulation software.


=== Experimental Design===
== Experimental Design==
=='''2.1 Verification of Mechanisms through Gel Experiments==
=== Verification of Mechanisms through Gel Experiments===
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/Gel Experiments|Gel Experiments]]''
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/Gel Experiments|Gel Experiments]]''
Before constructing our origami and observing how it behaves, we run a large number of experiments observable through Gel Electrophoresis to verify that many of our mechanisms behave as we expect them to.  
Before constructing our origami and observing how it behaves, we run a large number of experiments observable through Gel Electrophoresis to verify that many of our mechanisms behave as we expect them to.  


=='''2.2 Verification of Mechanisms through Fluorescent Spectroscopy==
=== Verification of Mechanisms through Fluorescent Spectroscopy===
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/SPEX Experiments|SPEX Experiments]]''
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/SPEX Experiments|SPEX Experiments]]''
Various DNA strands were tagged with fluorophores and quenchers in order to investigate different mechanisms more directly, both in solution and on origami.  
Various DNA strands were tagged with fluorophores and quenchers in order to investigate different mechanisms more directly, both in solution and on origami.  


=='''2.3 Verification of Mechanisms through Atomic Force Microscopy==
=== Verification of Mechanisms through Atomic Force Microscopy===
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/AFM Experiments|AFM Imaging]]''
:''Main article: [[Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/AFM Experiments|AFM Imaging]]''
Walkers tagged with biotins were planted onto DNA origami, attempts were made to observe random walking on the origami directly under AFM.   
Walkers tagged with biotins were planted onto DNA origami, attempts were made to observe random walking on the origami directly under AFM.   

Revision as of 21:03, 2 November 2011

Friday, April 26, 2024

Home

Members

Project

Protocols

Progress

Discussion

References


Project Design

Project Overview

Main article: Biomod/2011/Caltech/DeoxyriboNucleicAwesome/ProjectOverview/Project Overview

What are we aiming to achieve? Our goal for the summer is to develop a system that autonomously sorts DNA tagged structures. Our base system involves randomly placed DNA tagged cargo on a rectangular DNA origami [7]. One edge of the origami is tagged with goal strands, and the rest of the origami is filled with track strands. The origami is then populated with random walkers that traverse the origami, picking up cargo and dropping them off at the goal. The motion of the walker and cargos will be examined by atomic force microscopy imaging. Bulk behavior of the system, kinetics of walking, and mechanisms of cargo picking up, and cargo dropping off will be analyzed by SPEX experiment.


Domain Level Design

Main article: Domain Level Project Design


Overall domain level design is illustrated in figure 1. Following abbreviation will be frequently used: walker [W], walker inhibitor [WI], track 1 [TR1], probe for track 1 [PTR1], track 2 [TR2], probe for track 2 [PTR2], cargo 1 [C1], cargo attacher [CA], probe for cargo attacher [PCA], cargo goal inhibitor [CGI], cargo goal 1 [CG1], probe for cargo goal [PCG], walker goal [WG], and probe for walker goal [PWG].

Sequence Level Design

Main article: Sequence Design

With our overall design in mind, we must design DNA sequences, down to the base level, which undergo the interactions that we desire, without forming secondary structures and binding in unintended ways. We approach this through a combination of pre-generated noninteracting sequences, and trial-and-error design using NUPACK simulation software.

Experimental Design

Verification of Mechanisms through Gel Experiments

Main article: Gel Experiments

Before constructing our origami and observing how it behaves, we run a large number of experiments observable through Gel Electrophoresis to verify that many of our mechanisms behave as we expect them to.

Verification of Mechanisms through Fluorescent Spectroscopy

Main article: SPEX Experiments

Various DNA strands were tagged with fluorophores and quenchers in order to investigate different mechanisms more directly, both in solution and on origami.

Verification of Mechanisms through Atomic Force Microscopy

Main article: AFM Imaging

Walkers tagged with biotins were planted onto DNA origami, attempts were made to observe random walking on the origami directly under AFM.

References

[1] Lulu Qian and Erik Winfree. A simple DNA gate motif for synthesizing large-scale circuits. In International Meeting on DNA Computing, 2008.

[2] David Soloveichik, Georg Seelig and Erik Winfree. DNA as a Universal Substrate for Chemical Kinetics. DNA 14, LNCS 5347: 57-69, 2009

[3] David Soloveichik, Matthew Cook, Erik Winfree and Jehoshua Bruck. Computation with Finite Stochastic Chemical Reaction Networks. Natural Computing Feburary, 2008.

[4] Ye Tian, Yu He, Yi Chen, Peng Yin, and Chengde mao. A DNAzyme That Walks Processively and Autonomously along a One-Dimensional Track. Angewandte Chemie International EditionVol. 44, 4355-4358, 2005

[5] Kyle Lund, Anthony J. Manzo, Nadine Dabby, Nicole Michelotti, Alexander Johnson-Buck, Jeanette Nangreave, Steven Taylor, Renjun Pei, Milan N. Stojanovic, Nils G. Walter, Erik Winfree, and Hao Yan. Molecular Robots Guided by Prescriptive Landscapes. Nature, 206-210, 2010

[6] Hongzhou Gu, Jie Chao, Shou-Jun Xiao, Nadrian C. Seeman. A proximity-based programmable DNA nanoscale assembly line. Nature 465, 202–205. 2010

[7] Paul W. K. Rothemund. Folding DNA to Create Nanoscale Shapes and Patterns. Nature, 297-302, 2006