Biomod/2011/Columbia/MotorProTeam:Results: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
===Structure Formation===
===Structure Formation===


The first structure was built from a thin sheet of PDMS (100 μm). PDMS was spin-coated onto a patterned silicone wafer. Tape was wrapped around the circumference of the silicone wafer and the PDMS sheet was pulled off with the use of ethanol to help remove the thin layer from the surface.  
The first structure was built from a thin sheet of PDMS (100 μm). PDMS was spin-coated onto a patterned silicon wafer. Tape was wrapped around the circumference of the silicon wafer and the PDMS sheet was pulled off with the use of ethanol to help remove the thin layer from the surface.  


(insert image of pattern here)
(insert image of pattern here)

Revision as of 11:25, 20 June 2011


Home        Team Members        Background Information        Project Development        Results       


Alignment

Early experiments focused on using flow to align microtubules. The group performed motility assays, then flowed an antifade solution (a solution that removes unattached microtubules from the surface) containing AMP-PNP as a method of securing the microtubules in their positions for imaging. This method proved unreliable. While flow occasionally aligned a small proportion of the microtubules, in general this procedure did not work.

test
Image of flow test. Angle mean = 2.85°, sd = 55.145°‎

Currently, the team is investigating using a protein coated / blank surface boundary as a method to align microtubules. Microtubules that align themselves into the blank region of the flow cell (held at the positive end by a single kinesin motor protein) do not move out of alignment because the majority of their length is not acted upon by any motor proteins.

The team successfully created a barrier in a flow cell between an area with microtubules and an area without. This was performed by coating an isolated area (created using tape) with casein, and then removing the tape, attaching the top coverslip, and flowing kinesin through. When the motility solution and antifade were prepared with casein, the boundary was less defined when the solutions were prepared without.

test
Image of boundary with casein in solutions. Angle mean = -5.47°, sd = 50.65°
test
Image of boundary without casein in solutions. Angle mean on boundary = .14°, sd = 42.60°

Unfortunately, there was no alignment at the boundaries. The average angle of rotation was 8 degrees with a standard deviation of 48 degrees. The experiment was repeated with a higher concentration of kinesin and microtubules in order to make more microtubules at the boundary and to see if the concentration has an affect on the alignment of microtubules.

There was no difference in the alignment patterns between the highly concentrated microtubules and the lower concentrated ones.

Structure Formation

The first structure was built from a thin sheet of PDMS (100 μm). PDMS was spin-coated onto a patterned silicon wafer. Tape was wrapped around the circumference of the silicon wafer and the PDMS sheet was pulled off with the use of ethanol to help remove the thin layer from the surface.

(insert image of pattern here)

Microtubule Attachment

Molecular Transport