Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results And Discussion/Origami: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:15, 25 October 2013

<html> <style> /* ul.menu li.</html>Results_And_Discussion/Origami<html> a {

 color: cyan;

}

/

toc {

display: none; }

mytoc {

background: none; width: 200px; }

.toc { border: 0px solid; }

toc ul ul,.toc ul ul {

margin: 0 0 0 1em; }

table.toc { background-color: #f0f4f4; }

mytoc a,#mytoc a:visited {

font-size: normal; color: #222222; }

mytoc a:hover {

font-color: #009ee0; /* text-decoration: underline; */ }

wiki-toc {

width: 200px; margin-top: 6px; float: left; }

wiki-body {

margin-left: 200px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 35px; }

toc #toctitle,.toc #toctitle,#toc .toctitle,.toc .toctitle {

text-align: left; }

toc h2,.toc h2 {

font-weight: normal; font-size: 17px; }

/*

wiki-contents A {

color: #00aeef; }

wiki-contents A:HOVER {

color: #00aeef; }

/

toctitle span {

display: none; }

/*

wiki-body p,#wiki-body li,#wiki-body dd,div.thumbcaption {

font-size: medium; }

/

/* required to avoid jumping */

tocScrolWrapper {

/* left: 450px; */ position: absolute; /* margin-left: 35px; width: 280px; */ }

tocScrol {

position: absolute; top: 0; /* just used to show how to include the margin in the effect */ /*margin-top: 20px; */ /* border-top: 1px solid purple; */ /*padding-top: 19px;*/ }

tocScrol.fixed {

position: fixed; top: 0; }

editPageTxt {

text-align: left; padding-left: 15px; }

editPageTxt P {

clear: both; }

toPageTop {

float: left; position: relative; top: 18px; left: 13px; color: #d13f31; } </style>

$('#mytoc').find("#toc").attr("id", ""); parentTable.closest('table').remove(); });

$(document).ready( function() { var top = $('#tocScrol').offset().top - parseFloat($('#tocScrol').css('marginTop').replace( /auto/, 0)); var nav = $('#tocScrol'); var max = $('#indexing').offset().top - nav.height();

$(window).scroll(function(event) { // what the y position of the scroll is var y = $(this).scrollTop();

if (y > top) { // && signs are html decoded thus this construction if (y >= max) { nav.removeClass('fixed'); nav.css({ position : 'absolute', top : max - top }); } else { nav.addClass('fixed'); nav.removeAttr('style'); } } else { nav.removeClass('fixed'); nav.removeAttr('style'); } }); }); </script> <html> <html> <div id="wiki-contents"> <div id="tocScrolWrapper"> <div id="tocScrol"> <div id="wiki-toc"> <a id="toPageTop" href="#">▲</a> <table id="mytoc" class="toc" summary="Contents"> </table> <div id="editPageTxt"> <p> [<a href="http://openwetware.org/index.php?title=Biomod/2013/Aarhus/</html>Results_And_Discussion/Origami<html>&action=edit">edit this page</a>] </p> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="wiki-body"> </html>

Introduction to DNA origami

The design of the system was made using the DNA origami principle first described by Rothemund in 2006. [1] A DNA origami is made of the M13mp18 single stranded genome (7249 bases long) assembled with a number of shorter DNA strands, called staple strands, in a self-assembly reaction.

The strategy was to design and create two DNA origami structures, a plate structure and a dome structure. Subsequently, the plate structure was loaded with different modified oligonucleotides at the 3' end of selected staple strands and covered by the dome structure with a DNA-modified peptide lock system.

Origami plate

The design of the origami plate was inspired by previous work with multilayered DNA origamis. The plate was designed with a double helix layer to increase its stability. The goal was to design the plate as flat as possible to ensure that the plate could attach to the cell surface properly through cholesterol modifications [2, 3], thereby bringing the attached photosensitizers close enough to the cell to be able to induce apoptosis. [4]

Several 3' ends of the staple strands on one side of the plate were modified with different functional groups (cholesterols, photosensitizers, peptide lock and sisiRNA).

Two different versions of the system were made. In the first version the plate was modified with photosensitizers that produce cytotoxic singlet oxygen once radiated with 635 nm light and with cholesterol modified staple strands. [5]

The second version features the plate modified with sisiRNAs [6] that were conjugated to cell penetrating peptides, which can induce phenotypic response through the RNAi pathway. These were attached to the plate with the peptide lock that was designed to be cleaved by matrix metallo protease 2, which is overexpressed by some metastasizing cancer cells.

Origami dome

The dome origami was designed as a lid for the plate origami. It was based on the hemisphere origami design created by Han, D.R et al. [7]

This structure allows for a cavity inside the whole origami structure which would be large enough to contain the functional modifications (cholesterol, photosensitizer and sisiRNA).

The dome was assembled in a self-assembly reaction. Afterwards, an attempt was made to connect the dome and plate through the peptide lock.

Design

Design of the origami plate

The double layered plate design was chosen to increase the compactness of the structure and to induce further stability. Additionally, the correct shape of the structure could easily be verified by atomic force microscopy (AFM) or transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The design pattern was created in caDNAno [8][1] and subsequently sent to CanDo [2] for determination of the flexibility and bending of the 3D structures in solution (see figure 3). [9]

Fig.3. The 3D illustrations of the plate in solution from different viewpoints predicted by CanDo.

The dimensions of the plate DNA origami were limited by the length of M13mp18, and were approximately 21 helices wide, 2 helices high and 143 base pairs long (i.e. 52.5 nm x 5 nm x 46.3 nm). The staple strands connecting the edges were omitted in the origami structure to prevent oligomerisation, in which the structures align end to end and form long aggregates.[10] This leaves the scaffold strand with a single stranded region of between 16-26 nucleotides at both ends of each helix. The plate was designed with the approximate crossover pattern of 32 base pairs between adjacent helices because the multilayered origamis require frequent crossovers to hold the structures tightly together (see figure 4). The annealing domains of the staple strands are made in 8-8-8-8 motif. The strain of the structure is balanced by the deletion of one base pair per every fourth vertical crossover. An example of a such deletion is after the crossover between helix 2 and 5, where a deletion was made and then again at the third cross over between helix 2 and 5 (see figure 4).

Fig. 4. A graphic representation displaying the crossover pattern of the plate structure. The blue circle marks the crossover between helix 1 and 2, the green circle between helix 2 and 3 and the red circle between helix 2 and 5.

The same pattern was created between the rest of the helices in the structure to make the plate as flat as possible. The staple strands that fold the circular M13mp18 into the desired structure were divided into modules, depending on their function. These modules are shown in table ?(supplementary data) and in figure 5.

Fig. 5. The final design of the origami plate, Sites where cholesterols (blue circles) and photosensitizers (orange squares) will be attached are indicated. the sisiRNA-conjugate attachment sites are colored red and magenta, while the cyan colored staple are where the peptide locks are situated. Image made in Maya® from Autodesk and modified in PS5.

Fig. 6. The plate DNA origami design in CaDNAno. Scaffold DNA strand is shown in blue. Background staple strands in grey. The modified staple strands colored into different modules depending on the modification. Deletion pattern is marked with red X.

Design of the origami dome

The origami dome, designed as a lid for the plate origami, was based on the hemisphere origami design created by Dongran Han.[7] The design of the origami dome was chosen to create a hollow structure to enclose and protect the functional modifications (cholesterol, photosensitizer and sisiRNAs).

The design was made in caDNAno (see figure 7) and the structural details of the hemisphere is consistent with table ? in supplementary data.

The staple strands were divided into colored modules (see table ? - supplementarty data). The staple strands in the white colored module can be replaced by the peptide lock-connecting strands of the D-zip module (see Connection of the plate and the dome). The Plate XO staple module can be replaced by the Dome-Plate-Connector module (see Connection of the plate and the dome).

Fig. 7. The dome structure designed in caDNAno (top). The structure is composed of the 7249 bases long M13mp18, shown with medium blue in this figure. Staple strands to help the structure fold correctly are shown in all others colors. The caDNAno design as plug-in to Autodesk Maya depicting the dome (bottom).

Design of the connection between the plate and the dome

The lock mechanism of the system, utilized different staple strand overhangs from the two structures, designed to anneal to the modified peptide-DNA lock construct (peptide lock). The 3’ overhang from the dome origami anneal in a zipper-like helix with the 5’ end of the peptide lock, while the 3’ overhang of the plate origami anneals forming an overlapping helix structure with the 3’end as toehold (see figure 8). This lock design was chosen because it creates stability of the structure as well as easier accessibility for the enzyme to cleave at the overlapping helix region. Furthermore the zipper-like helix creates a degree of flexibility so that the lock is able to hold the structures tight, although not so tight that it will cause unwinding of the structure. The strand displacement technique was intended to test the lock and key mechanism of the system, using the 3’ toehold of the staple strand from the plate (green) to remove the WB-peptide-lock (black) holding the structures together (see figure 8B).

Fig 8. The peptide lock mechanism. A: The assembly of the peptide-lock and to the two DNA structures. The peptide lock is marked in red. B: The test system, held together by the WB-peptide lock instead of the real peptide lock.

Furthermore, an aid mechanism was made in order to create a higher yield of assembly of the two structures. Eight strands from the dome connecter-module of the plate were designed to create a direct crossover between the structures. These strands anneal with the 5’ end in the plate origami and cross over into the outer ring of the dome origami, annealing at the plate-XO strands sites. These are marked in orange in figure 8.

These staple strands can be removed again using toeholds applied to the 3’ end of the strand, followed by strand displacement. This mechanism ensures that the final system is able to separate when the peptide locks are cleaved.

Results and discussion

Origami plate

To investigate the optimal self-assembly conditions for the plate origami, reactions were performed with different ratios of staple strands to M13mp18, time ramps and self-assembly buffers. The self-assembly reactions were performed with buffers containing MgCl₂ in concentrations of either 5 mM, 8 mM, 12.5 mM, 18 mM or 20 mM or MgAc in concentrations of 12.5 mM or 18 mM.

The agarose gel in figure 9 showed clear band shifts in the lanes containing the assembled structures over both 1, 3 and 5 hour linear temperature ramps. In these reactions, a 1:10 ratio between M13mp18 and staple strands was used (see figure 9). However, further characterization using AFM showed incorrect folding of the structure. This led to the conclusion that the structure did not assemble at a 3-hour linear ramp (see figure 10).

Fig. 9. 1% agarose gel containing self-assembled plate origami. 1) 1Kb DNA ladder, 2) M13 control, 3) 8 mM Mg, 1 hour ramp, 10x ss, 4) 12,5 mM Mg, 1 hour ramp, 10x ss, 5) 8 mM Mg, 3 hour ramp, 10x ss, 6) 12,5 mM Mg, 3 hour ramp, 10x ss, 7) 8 mM Mg, 5 hour ramp, 10x ss, 8) 12,5 mM Mg, 5 hour ramp, 10x ss.

Fig. 10. AFM images of unfolded plate structures from the 3-hour ramp.

Fig. 11. Optimization of origami plate folding. Assembly of the plate was done with two different reaction buffers, MgCl₂ and MgAc, and also with different concentration of them (MgCl₂: 5, 8, 12.5, 18 and 20 mM. MgAc: 12.5 and 18 mM). Furthermore different ratios between M13 and staple strands, 1:5 and 1:7, were tested.

Subsequently, a 10-hour linear ramp was tested (figure 11). In both the 5mM, 8mM and 12.5 mM MgCl₂ lanes, a band was seen indicating correct self-assembly. The faint bands in the lane with 18 mM and 20 mM MgCl₂ indicated that these concentrations were too high, thereby leading to aggregation of the structures. In addition, a band in the 12.5 mM MgAc lane is seen, indicating that this buffer could also be used, however working commenced with the 12.5 mM MgCl₂ concentration, as this appeared to be optimal.

Several annealing ramps were tested, both non-linear and linear ramps, ranging from 1 hours to 72 hours. A longer annealing time could ensure that the DNA strands further approaches the free energy minimum, which should make the structure assemble correctly. A longer annealing time might result in aggregations due to kinetic traps, when longer strands anneal in unwanted ways. However, this is not proven and need further testing.

The reactions that showed the clearest and most intense band shifts were the 5 hours and the 13 hours non-linear temperature ramps (see figure 12).

fig. 12. 1% agarose gel of the self-assembled DNA origami plate. 1) 1Kb DNA ladder, 2) M13 control, 3) 18 mM Mg, 5 hours, 20x ss, 4) 20 mM Mg, 5 hours, 20x ss, 5) 18 mM Mg, 5 hours, 10x ss, 6) 20 mM Mg, 5 hours, 10x ss, 7) 18 mM Mg, 13 hours, 20x ss, 8) 20 mM Mg, 13 hours, 20x ss, 9) 18 mM Mg, 13 hours, 20x ss, purified, 10) 20 mM Mg, 13 hours, 20x ss, purified.

The gel in figure 12 showed signs of aggregations that might be caused by enhanced stacking between the structures. However, a difference in the amount of aggregation was observed when comparing the samples with higher Mg²⁺ concentration. Lane 6 appears to contain more and larger aggregates than lane 5 that contain a lower Mg²⁺ concentration (figure 12).

The samples in figure 12 all seemed to be assembled, as indicated by the band shift. AFM images of the 18 mM Mg sample that was annealed over 5 hours still showed incorrect assembly (images not shown). Additional AFM imaging was made on samples assembled in the 12.5, 18 and 20 mM Mg²⁺ with both the 17-hour non-linear ramp and the 13-hour non-linear ramp (figure 13 shows the 12.5 mM Mg sample at a 17-hour ramp).

Based on these images, all future work was done on a 12.5 mM MgCl₂ and a 17-hours non-linear time ramp at a 21 nM origami concentration, showing the best yield of non-aggregated correctly assembled plate origami. In addition to AFM images, TEM images of the sample with 12.5 mM MgCl₂ and 17 hour ramp were obtained, and those images confirmed that the plate origami assembled correctly using the described conditions (figure 14).

The size of the plate appears to be approximately 45 nm x 45 nm with only little aggregation observed using 12.5 mM MgCl₂.

Fig. 13. AFM images of the self-assembled DNA origami plate structure on a 17-hour ramp at 12.5 mM Mg²⁺. The upper row and lower row are at two different scanning areas of different size making the lower images more close-up.

Fig. 14. TEM image of the origami plate.

Origami dome

To investigate the optimal self-assembly conditions for the dome origami, reactions were performed with different self-assembly buffers. The assembled dome was expected to be localized slightly above the unfolded M13mp18 control band in a native 1 % agarose gel. The buffers containing different Mg²⁺ concentrations (see materialts and methods) were tested as well as the required amount of staple strands to fold the M13mp18 correctly. The different reaction mixtures were annealed over a non-linear annealing ramp constituted by rapid heating to 95°C and subsequent slow cooling.

Fig. 15. 1% agarose gel loaded with the self-assembly of the dome structure and run at 80 V for 3 hours. 1) 1 Kb ladder, 2) M13mp18 control, 3-5) the self-assembly reaction with 10x staple strands (ss) at a 13-hour non- linear annealing ramp and with a Mg concentration of 5 mM, 12.5 mM and 16 mM respectively, 6-7) the self- assembly reaction with 20x ss at 13-hour non-linear ramp with 5 mM and 12.5 mM Mg respectively, 8-9) the same reaction mixture as for lane 3-5 but at a 17-hour non-linear annealing ramp.

The gel in figure 15 showed distinct band shifts between the single stranded scaffold in lane 2 and the bands in lanes 3-10. These shifts indicate structural changes of the scaffolds in the samples, but also show that the structures had aggregated. From these results it was not possible to conclude if the folded structures had assembled correctly. The structures in lane 3-5 and 8-10 were assembled with a 10x staple strand excess compared to M13mp18, while the structures in lane 6 and 7 were assembled with a 20x excess of staple strands. There was no difference between the positions and intensities of these bands, indicating that a 10x excess of staple strands would be sufficient for self-assembly to take place. The increased Mg²⁺ concentration in the different reactions enables the helices to pack more closely, thereby creating a tighter structure that appears smaller in the gel. Thus, when the Mg²⁺ concentration is increased in the self-assembly reaction, the structures migrate further in the gel. The difference when using the 13-hour non-linear ramp and 17-hour non-linear ramp was very small, and other characterization methods were therefore needed to determine if the 13-hour ramp sufficed, or if the 17- hour ramp were necessary. Furthermore, the size of the structure was hard to determine with certainty due to the large unpaired region of the scaffold strands and the asymmetrical shape of a hemisphere.

A reaction with 12.5 mM Mg²⁺ buffer and a 10x excess of staple strands, annealed over an even shorter non-linear temperature ramp of 11 hours was imaged using AFM ( see figure 16). These images confirmed that the dome was able to fold into the desired structure under the tested conditions.

Fig. 16. AFM images of the dome DNA origami using liquid tapping mode. The upper row and lower row are at two different scanning areas of different size making the lower images more close-up.

A dome self-assembly reaction with 12.5 mM MgCl₂ annealed over a 17 hour non-linear time ramp imaged with TEM concur with the AFM images revealing the assembled dome structure (see figure 17).

Fig. 17. TEM images showing the dome structure. The structure was annealed in 12.5 mM MgCl₂ buffer and a 17 hour non-linear ramp.

In the gel in figure 15, aggregations were evident. To avoid this, adding formamide to the self-assembly buffer was tested.[11]

Fig. 18. 1% agarose gel containing origamies assembled as specified in the figure on a 17 hour non-linear ramp.

However, the gel did not show minimized aggregation upon addition of formamide to the buffer and this approach was abolished.

Connecting the plate and dome origamis

After succesfully assembling the plate and the dome separately, experiments were performed to connect the two structures. The plate and dome were originally intended to be connected through the peptide lock, but this was not finished at the time of this experiment. Instead it was attempted to show that these structures could be connected using staple strands that mimicked the peptide lock (WB-peptide lock). Before connecting the dome and plate, both origamis had to be purified to avoid unwanted aggregates using a 100kDa Amicon Spin Filter. The gel in figure 19 indicates that the purification using spin filtration was successful in removing the excess staple strands from the plate. However, a small degree of aggregation was observed, due to sample upconcentration occurring during spin filtration.

Fig. 19. 1% Agarose gel containing self-assembly reactions of the dome and plate. Both were performed in a 12.5mM MgCl₂ buffer over a 17-hour non-linear ramp. 1) 1kb ladder, 2) M13 control, 3) Purified 21nM plate, 4) Unpurified 1nM dome. It is seen in the gel that purification with the Amicon Spin Filter was successful in removing the excess staples but induced aggregations.

Spin filtration proved to be less useful for purification of the dome origami, as the folded structure was unable to withstand the high speeds of centrifugation required in this method. Centrifugation at lower speeds was tested, but this approach was not successful in removing the excess staple strands. Instead, freeze n’ squeeze gel purification was employed. This method proved successful for purification of the dome, by removing both excess staple strands and aggregations visible in the unpurified sample in figure 20.

Fig. 20. 1% Agarose gel containing self-assembly reactions of both dome and plate and purified dome samples. All samples are assembled in 12.5mM MgCl₂ over a 17 hour non-linear ramp. 1) 1Kb ladder, 2) M13 control, 3) 21nM unpurified plate, 4) 5nM unpurified dome, 5) 5nM purified dome, 6) 5nM purified dome, 7) 5nM dome purified, 8) 1nM unpurified dome. It is seen that the purification using freeze n’ squeeze was a succes as the staple cloud and aggregations are gone after purification.

As seen from the gels in figure 20 and 21, attachment of the dome and the plate was inconclusive. Lane 3 contains 21 nM unpurified folded plate, but instead of shifting upwards in the gel, as anticipated from previous experiments (see figure 9, 11, 12), the band appears lower than the unfolded M13mp18 control in lane 2. In addition, the purification of the dome origami gave a low yield, even after an attempted upconcentration of the sample on a spin filter.

If a connection of the two origamis had been achieved, a merge of the two colors from the Cy-dyes would have been seen in lane 8 and 9. This is not apparent from the gel in figure 21A, but figure figure 21B show that this might be due to the low amount of dome origami seen in lane 8 and 9. Due to time constraints it was not possible to perform further experiments to connect the two origamis.

Fig. 21. 1% Agarose gel containing self-assembly reactions of dome and plate, both purified and unpurified as well as connection samples. All self-assembly reactions were performed in 12.5mM MgCl2 over a 17 hour non-linear ramp. A: 1) 1kb Ladder, 2) M13 control, 3) Unpurified 21nM plate, 4) 21nM plate purified with spin filter, 5) Unpurified 1nM dome, 6) 1nM dome up-concentrated, but not purified, using spin filter, 7) Up-concentrated and freeze n’ squeeze purified 1nM dome, 8) Connection attempt at room temperature, 9) Connection attempt at 2.5 hour linear ramp. B: The same gel, imaging the Cy3 emission. Only the relevant bands are shown.

Conclusion

Designing two complex 3D DNA origami structures was achieved using the program caDNAno in combination with the plug-in feature of Autodesk Maya to visualize the 3D structures of the origamis. CanDo was employed to provide a computational prediction of the structures, regarding additional information about the shape and flexibility in solution.

Succesful self-assembly was achieved form for both of the two origami structures. Through optimizations of the magnesium concentration in the self-assembly buffer and as well as changing the time and temperature of the annealing ramp, the structures were successfully assembled.

Characterization of the structures was achieved by both gel electrophoresis, AFM and TEM, confirming the formation of the correct structures.

Furthermore, attempts were made to connect the two structures. These results were inconclusive and further experiments will need further optimizations.

References

Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297-302 (2006)[1]
[Rothemund]
Teruya, K. et al. Semisynthesis of a protein with cholesterol at the C-terminal, targeted to the cell membrane of live cells. K. Protein J. 29, 493–500 (2010). [1]
[Teruya]
Langecker, M. et al. Synthetic lipid membrane channels formed by designed DNA nanostructures. Science 338, 932–936 (2012)[1] LIGGER DOBBELT
[Langecker]
Pedersen, B. W. et al. Single Cell Responses to Spatially-Controlled Photosensitized Production of Extracellular Singlet Oxygen. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 1077-1091 (2011) [1]
[Pedersen]
Arian, D. et al. A nucleic acid dependent chemical photocatalysis in live human cells. Chem. Eur. J. 16, 288–295 (2010).[1] LIGGER DOBBELT
[Arian]
Bramsen, J. B. et al. Improved silencing properties using small internally segmented interfering RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 5886-97 (2007). [1].
[Bramsen]
Han, D.R. et al. DNA Origami with Complex Curvatures in Three-Dimensional Space. Science 332, 342-346 (2011) [1]
[Han]
Douglas, S.M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001-5006 (2009) [1]
[Douglas]
Kim, D. N. et al. Quantitative prediction of 3D solution shape and flexibility of nucleic acid nanostructures. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2862-2868 (2012). [1]
[Kim]
Kim, K. N. et al. Comparison of methods for orienting and aligning DNA origami. Soft Matter 7, 4636-4643 (2011). [1]
[KimKN]
Zhang, Z. et al. Self-assembly of DNA origami and single-stranded tile structures at room temperature. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 52, 9219-23 (2013) [1]
[Zhang]
Y. Ke et al. Multilayer DNA Origami Packed on a Square Lattice. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 15903-15908 (2009). [1]
[Ke]
Patel, L. N. et al. Cell penetrating peptides: Intracellular pathways and pharmaceutical perspectives. Pharm. Res. 24, 1977-92 (2007). [1]
[Patel]
O. Mendes et al. MMP2 role in breast cancer brain metastasis development and its regulation by timp2 and erk1/2. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 24, 341-351 (2007). [1]
[Mendes]

indexing {

/* float: left; position: center; */ background-color: #222; border-top: 2px solid #d13f31; color: #006e9c; margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 10px 0px; width: 100%; text-align: center; }

.footer-section { padding: 10px; display: table-cell; text-align: left; }

.footer-section-title { font-size: 20px; }

footer-contents {

color: #006e9c; display: inline-table; }

.footer-section A { color: #006e9c; text-decoration: none; }

.footer-section A:HOVER { color: #00aeef; }

.footer-section ul { list-style-type: square; }

sitemapTitle {

margin-top: 20px; font-size: 24px; }

editFooter {

float: right; margin-top: -28px; margin-right: 5px; }

editFooter A {

color: #006e9c; text-decoration: none; }

.cf:before,.cf:after { content: " "; /* 1 */ display: table; /* 2 */ }

.cf:after { clear: both; }

bodyContent a[href^="mailto:"], .link-mailto {

   background: url() no-repeat scroll right center transparent;
   padding-right: 0px;
   color: #006e9c;

}

</style> </head> <body> <div id="indexing"> <div id="sitemap"> <p id="sitemapTitle">SITEMAP | BIOMOD 2013 NANO CREATORS | Aarhus University</p> <div id="footer-contents"> <div class="footer-section"> <p class="footer-section-title">INTRODUCTION</p> <ul> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus">Home, abstract, animation and video</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Introduction">Introduction</a></li </ul> </div> <div class="footer-section"> <p class="footer-section-title">RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</p> <ul> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Origami">Origami</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Peptide_lock">Peptide lock</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Chemical_Modification">Chemical modification</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/sisiRNA">sisiRNA</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/System_In_Action">System in action</a></li> </ul> </div> <div class="footer-section"> <p class="footer-section-title">MATERIALS AND METHODS</p> <ul> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Materials_And_Methods/Origami">Origami</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Materials_And_Methods/Peptide_lock">Peptide lock</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Materials_And_Methods/Chemical_Modification">Chemical modification</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Materials_And_Methods/sisiRNA">sisiRNA</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Materials_And_Methods/System_In_Action">System in action</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Materials_And_Methods/Methods">Methods</a></li> </ul> </div> <div class="footer-section"> <p class="footer-section-title">SUPPLEMENTARY</p> <ul> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Supplementary/Team_And_Acknowledgments">Team and acknowledgments</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Supplementary/Optimizations">Optimizations</a></li> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Supplementary/Supplementary_Data">Supplementary data</a></li>

                                               <li><a

href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Supplementary/Supplementary_Informations">Supplementary informations</a> <li><a href="/wiki/Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Supplementary/References">References</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> <div> <p id="copyright">Copyright (C) 2013 | BIOMOD Team Nano Creators @ Aarhus University | Programming by: <a href="mailto:pvskaarup@gmail.com?Subject=BIOMOD 2013:">Peter Vium Skaarup</a>.</p> </div> </div>

<div> <img alt="Sigma - Aldrich" src="http://openwetware.org/images/3/39/Sigmaaldrich-logo%28transparant%29.png" width="300px" height="154px"> <img alt="VWR International" src="http://openwetware.org/images/2/28/Vwr_logo.png" width="300px" height="61px"> <img alt="Promega" src="http://openwetware.org/images/7/72/Promega.png" width="175px" height="105px" style="padding-right: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <img alt="kem-en-tec" src="http://openwetware.org/images/3/3a/Kementec.png" width="130px" height="129px"> <img alt="Centre For Dna Nanotechnology" src="http://openwetware.org/images/4/4f/CDNA_logo.png" width="420px" height="90px"> <img alt="Dansk Tennis Fond" src="http://openwetware.org/images/9/9a/Dansk_tennis.png" width="250px" height="53px"> </div> <div id="editFooter"> [<a href="http://openwetware.org/index.php?title=Template:Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Nano_Creators/footer&action=edit">edit sitemap</a>] </div> </div> </body> </html>

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Chemical_Modification#Photosensitizer|photosensitizers]] close enough to the cell to be able to induce apoptosis. <cite>Pedersen</cite>
-Several 3' ends of the staple strands on one side of the plate were modified with different functional groups  ([[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Chemical_Modification#Cholesterol|cholesterols]], [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Chemical_Modification#Synthesis_of_the_Photosensitizer|photosensitizers]], [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Peptide_lock|peptide lock]] and [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/sisiRNA|sisiRNA]]).
+Several 3' ends of the staple strands on one side of the plate were modified with different functional groups  ([[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Chemical_Modification#Cholesterol|cholesterols]], [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Chemical_Modification#Photosensitizer|photosensitizers]], [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Peptide_lock|peptide lock]] and [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/sisiRNA|sisiRNA]]).
 Two different versions of the system were made. In the first version the plate was modified with [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Chemical_Modification#Synthesis_of_the_Photosensitizer|photosensitizers]] that produce cytotoxic singlet oxygen once radiated with 635 nm light and with [[Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results_And_Discussion/Chemical_Modification#Cholesterol|cholesterol]] modified staple strands. <cite>Arian</cite>

Biomod/2013/Aarhus/Results And Discussion/Origami: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:15, 25 October 2013

Contents

Introduction to DNA origami

Origami plate

Origami dome

Design

Design of the origami plate

Design of the origami dome

Design of the connection between the plate and the dome

Results and discussion

Origami plate

Origami dome

Connecting the plate and dome origamis

Conclusion

References

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

research

Tools