Biomod/2013/StJohns/results: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
*[[Biomod/2013/StJohns/results#DLS|We have not been able to differentiate bound and unbound complexes via DLS.]]
*[[Biomod/2013/StJohns/results#DLS|We have not been able to differentiate bound and unbound complexes via DLS.]]
*We have generated and isolated FAB fragments for use as binding elements in future claw designs.
*We have generated and isolated FAB fragments for use as binding elements in future claw designs.
*We have demonstrated the potential for selecting claws based on their avidity using a chromatography augmented with photocleavable elements.
*[[Biomod/2013/StJohns/results#Selection|We have demonstrated the potential for selecting claws based on their avidity using a chromatography augmented with photocleavable elements.]]


=Data=
=Data=
Line 33: Line 33:


Our DLS measurements confirmed that the origami control structure and the capsid were of different sizes. However, when performing DLS on a mix of nonfunctionalized origami and capsid, we found only a single peak rather than peaks showing two differently-sized objects. Based on [[Biomod/2013/StJohns/results#Binding Interaction|data from other experiments]], it is unlikely that this represents a binding interaction. We are currently investigating the source of this anomaly.
Our DLS measurements confirmed that the origami control structure and the capsid were of different sizes. However, when performing DLS on a mix of nonfunctionalized origami and capsid, we found only a single peak rather than peaks showing two differently-sized objects. Based on [[Biomod/2013/StJohns/results#Binding Interaction|data from other experiments]], it is unlikely that this represents a binding interaction. We are currently investigating the source of this anomaly.
[[Image:Lukemanlab-2013-0003.png|thumb|400px|center]]
[[Image:Lukemanlab-2013-0003.png|thumb|400px|center]]
==Selection==
[[Image:Lukemanlab-2013-0004.jpg|thumb|400px|center| The blue boxes highlight where bands would be expected if the photocleaving reaction failed. <br> Note the presence of only functionalized claw in the post-cleavage solution.]]

Revision as of 13:00, 24 October 2013

<html>

<head>

<link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'>

</head>



<style>

body {

 font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', 'Open Sans', sans-serif;
 overflow-y: auto;

}

.container {

 background-color: #ffffff;
 margin-top:0px

} .OWWNBcpCurrentDateFilled { display: none; }

h5 {

 font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', 'Open Sans', sans-serif;
 font-size: 11px;
 font-style: normal;
 text-align: center;
 margin:0px;
 padding:0px;

}

  1. column-content

{

 width: 0px; 
 float: left; 
 margin: 0 0 0 0;
 padding: 0;

} .firstHeading {

 display:none;
 width:0px;

}

  1. column-one

{

 display:none; 
 width:0px;
 background-color: #ffffff;

}

  1. globalWrapper

{

 width: 1024px;
 background-color: #ffffff;
 margin-left: auto;
 margin-right: auto

}

  1. content

{

 margin: 0 0 0 0;
 align: center;
 padding: 12px 12px 12px 12px;
 width: 1000px;
 background-color: #ffffff; border: 0;

}

  1. bodyContent

{

 width: 974px;
 align: justify;
 background-color: #fffffff;

}

  1. column-content

{

 width: 1024px;
 background-color: #ffffff;

}

  1. footer

{

 position: absolute;
 bottom: 0;
 width: 1024px;

}

  1. menu

{

 position: fixed;
 float: left;
 width: 180px;
 padding: 10px;
 background-color: #FFFFFF;

}

  1. resolutionwarning

{

 display: none;
 text-align: center;

}

  1. pagecontent

{

 text-align: justify;
 float: right;
 width: 744px;
 margin-left: 300px;
 min-height: 400px

}

  1. toc { display: none; }

@media all {

   body { background: #ffffff 0 0 no-repeat;}

}

/*Expanding list*/ ul { list-style: none; }

  1. exp li ul { display: none; }
  2. exp li:hover ul { display: block; }
  3. exp li a:active ul { display: block; }

a:link {color:#007788;} /*unvisited link*/ a:visited {color:#007788;} /* visited link */ a:hover {color:#00ccff;} /* mouse over link */ a:active {color:#00ccff;} /* selected link */

</style> </html>

For optimal viewing experience, please enlarge this window to at least 1024 pixels.

Summary

Data

Claw Visualization

Below are AFM images of the claws alone, with and without binding elements. <html><center><table><tbody align="center"><tr><td><img src="http://openwetware.org/images/thumb/6/66/Lukemanlab-Bluntclaw_afm.png/200px-Lukemanlab-Bluntclaw_afm.png"></td><td><img src="http://openwetware.org/images/thumb/9/9f/Lukemanlab-Stickyclaw_afm.png/200px-Lukemanlab-Stickyclaw_afm.png"></td></tr><tr><td>"Blunt" claw</td><td>"Sticky" claw</td></tr></tbody></table></center></html>

Binding Interaction

We used gel electrophoresis to characterize the binding interaction between origami structures and capsids with and without binding elements.

No binding between WT capsids and any DO,
‘sticky’ DO bind sticky capsids strongly;
however, blunt DO binds sticky capsids.

FRET

Below is a gel demonstrating that versions of the claw tagged with different fluorescent elements can be visually distinguished on a gel.

Each different color band corresponds to a different fluorescent tag.
The six bands on the left are 'blunt' claw and the six on the right are 'sticky' claw.
Odd-numbered lanes contain 0.1 pmol claw, while even-numbered lanes contain 0.2 pmol.

DLS

Our DLS measurements confirmed that the origami control structure and the capsid were of different sizes. However, when performing DLS on a mix of nonfunctionalized origami and capsid, we found only a single peak rather than peaks showing two differently-sized objects. Based on data from other experiments, it is unlikely that this represents a binding interaction. We are currently investigating the source of this anomaly.

Selection

The blue boxes highlight where bands would be expected if the photocleaving reaction failed.
Note the presence of only functionalized claw in the post-cleavage solution.