CANB610:RNA sequencing: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tim Butler (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tim Butler (talk | contribs) (q) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
'''Most subsequent work have been critical of study's findings, does this data have any champions?''' | '''Most subsequent work have been critical of study's findings, does this data have any champions?''' | ||
'''Does this information call into question RNAseq data? That is, if transcripts are being measured that correspond to alternative transcript forms/paralogous genes, are measured transcript levels too high?''' | |||
Revision as of 13:56, 26 January 2012
Discussion Points:
How should these results be interpreted? RNA infidelity, paralogy/pseudogenes, poor data, or other?
What are the implications of these interpretations?
What further data is needed to have confidence in paper's conclusions?
Most subsequent work have been critical of study's findings, does this data have any champions?
Does this information call into question RNAseq data? That is, if transcripts are being measured that correspond to alternative transcript forms/paralogous genes, are measured transcript levels too high?
