CHE.496/2008/Schedule/Systems biology and synthetic biology: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
*'''Modular approaches to expanding the functions of living matter [http://www.nature.com/nchembio/journal/v2/n6/abs/nchembio789.html link] | *'''Modular approaches to expanding the functions of living matter [http://www.nature.com/nchembio/journal/v2/n6/abs/nchembio789.html link] | ||
*'''[[User:George Washington|George Washington]] 15:48, 2 April 2008 (EDT)''' |
Revision as of 12:48, 2 April 2008
Systems biology and synthetic biology
- Discussion leader: George W.
- Systems biology as a foundation for genome-scale synthetic biology link
- This article discusses the connection between systems biology and synthetic biology, specifically how modern advances in systems biology aid the development of the nascent field of synthetic biology
- One current approach taken by systems biologists is to 'reconstruct' a system
- This is done by first incorporating every relevant reaction into a stoichiometric matrix
- From this, a set of parameters can be identified
- By applying 'flux balance analysis' to this model, a concrete model that accurately predicts temporal evolution of the system can be achieved
- Requires many parameters to be defined as well as a 'demand reaction' to drive the system, which is unknown in most cases outside of exponential growth
- Much of the software developed for systems biology will be useful in the pursuit of computational analysis in synthetic biology
- In order to deal with unknown parameters, synthetic biologists can use directed evolution to make a system conform to known parameters; in short, make the system imitate the model
- New experimental techniques are always improving parameter estimation and system reconstruction, and these will clearly benefit both systems and synthetic biologists
- Maybe we can use some of these techniques in our own work?
- Developing our own 'reconstruction' seems unlikely to be feasible, although if we're working with a known system, we may be able to use others' results
- The OptStrain strategy may be feasible if we do metabolic engineering, but I doubt we'll be doing a qualitatively new pathway, so this is likely unnecessary
- Modular approaches to expanding the functions of living matter link
- George Washington 15:48, 2 April 2008 (EDT)