CHEM 428: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: Chemistry 428 Fall 2007 Mondays 11-11:50 AM Fenton 337 Instructor: Melanie B. Berkmen Office: Donohue 513 Phone: 617-973-5321 Email: mberkmen@suffolk.edu Office Hours: Mon. 12:30-1:30,...)
 
No edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:


6. Students will attend departmental seminars.
6. Students will attend departmental seminars.
Your grade will be based upon the following:
30% - Final research proposal, assessed by me and your research advisor
30% - Presentation, assessed by the Chemistry faculty and your CHEM 428 peers
15% - Participation in group meetings and attendance of departmental talks
10% - Research proposal 1st draft
  5% - Participation during journal club
  5% - Peer-editing of a classmate’s research proposal 1st draft
  5% - Binder with notes and primary literature
Tentative! Course Schedule
1 Sept. 10 Introduction and syllabus
Fill out survey
2 Sept. 17 Discussion of advisors
How to search the literature
How to choose a topic
Vote for topic of our journal club
3 Sept. 24 How to read a paper
Informal reports to the group – choice of topics and advisors
DUE DATE: choose advisor
4 Oct. 1 Informal reports to the group
DUE DATE: choose format & turn in 1 paragraph about your topic
Oct. 8 Columbus Day: No class
5 Oct. 15 Informal reports to the group
Journal club paper is handed out
6 Oct. 22 Journal club: we will discuss 1 or 2 pre-assigned papers
7 Oct. 29 How to write a paper or proposal
Informal reports to the group
8 Nov. 5 How to cite literature properly
Informal reports to the group
Nov. 12 Veteran’s Day: No class
DUE DATE: 2 copies of 1st draft of proposal due
9 Nov. 19 Informal reports to the group
DUE DATE: Peer-edit of a classmate’s research proposal 1st draft
10 Nov. 26 Informal reports to the group
DUE DATE: Turn in final paper/proposal
11 Dec. 3 Survey
Practice Talks (most will be scheduled out of class time)
To be scheduled Final presentations to department
DUE DATE: Turn in binder after presentation
Topics to be covered in CHEM 429
Discussion of lab etiquette, common sense and courtesy
Reminders of how to keep good notebooks and/or notes
Science and ethics: discussion of case studies
Each student explains and leads discussion on 1 journal article most relevant to their work (20 min)

Revision as of 08:40, 20 August 2007

Chemistry 428 Fall 2007

Mondays 11-11:50 AM Fenton 337

Instructor: Melanie B. Berkmen Office: Donohue 513 Phone: 617-973-5321 Email: mberkmen@suffolk.edu Office Hours: Mon. 12:30-1:30, Tues. 12-1, Thurs. 2:30-3:30 or by appointment

Course Description: Independent study under the direct supervision of the chemistry faculty. Students are required to attend departmental seminars and submit an oral and written research proposal for review by the chemistry faculty. 1-3 credits.

HIGHLY Recommended text: The ACS Style Guide: Effective Communication of Scientific Information, Third Edition (Anne M. Coghill and Lorrin R. Garson, Eds.) Oxford University Press: New York, 2006. 448 pp. ISBN 0841239991. This text gives advice on everything from referencing, grammar, to ethics. You can order new on Amazon for ~$43, buy it from the bookstore, or use the free ones at the library reference section or on the bookshelf in the Chemistry Office.

1. All students will participate in weekly group meetings. Participation is critical in this type of class and counts for 20% of your grade. In most meetings, students will informally describe their progress on their research for 5 minutes each. Students may discuss a paper, a problem that they are trying to solve, a method that they are learning about, show a slide or figure that they are working, etc.

2. Students are also expected to hold individual meetings with their faculty advisor on a regular basis throughout the semester.

3. Students will develop a paper or proposal (double-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, 6-10 pages for a and b, 10-15 pages for c, the list of references is not included in total page limit). The student can choose any one of the three formats:

a. Research proposal Following a grant proposal format, the student will describe a hypothesis that they intend to test or a problem that they wish to explore. They will then explain the experimental/laboratory/analytical approach(s) that they will employ in the Spring Semester to answer their question. The proposals will include: 1. Introduction: Background, hypothesis and significance 2. Outline of experimental plan 3. Discussion: Anticipated outcomes, problems, and conclusions 4. References


b. Mock Grant Proposal This proposal will follow a formal grant proposal format. The student will describe a theoretical hypothesis or problem that they wish to explore. The proposal will include: 1. Introduction: Background, hypothesis and significance 2. Outline of experimental approach 3. Discussion: Anticipated outcomes, problems, and conclusions 4. References

c. Research review. Research reviews provide an in-depth analysis of a specific field and a deep synthesis of the material. Research reviews are not simply a summary of related articles. The student will describe the most recent advances and techniques in the area, explain any points of contention, and illuminate the most interesting questions that remain unanswered. 1. Introduction: Thesis and significance 2. Overview of literature 3. Conclusion 4. References

4. Students will present a proposal to the Chem./Biochem. Dept faculty and students in seminar. Presentations will use Powerpoint and will be 20 min. with 5 min. for questions.

5. Students will turn in an organized binder containing your notes and your primary literature (copies of the reviews, chapters, papers that you read – organized by date of publishing) at the end of class.

6. Students will attend departmental seminars.