ChemEng590BAssignments: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
Research Project              50%<br>
Research Project              50%<br>
Wiki Pages & Presentation 20%<br>
Wiki Pages & Presentation 20%<br>
In Class Literature Review 30%<br>
In Class Literature Review 20%<br>
In Class Problem Sets 10%<br>
Problem Sets (10 total) will be scored 0, 1, or 2, for a maximum of 15 total possible points.<br>


94-100 A<br>
94-100 A<br>
Line 29: Line 31:
[[ChemEng575_NIHPres_Rubric | NIH Presentations Grading Rubric]]<br>
[[ChemEng575_NIHPres_Rubric | NIH Presentations Grading Rubric]]<br>
[[ChemEng575_SummaryStatement_Rubric | Grant Review Day Summary Statement Grading Rubric]]<br>
[[ChemEng575_SummaryStatement_Rubric | Grant Review Day Summary Statement Grading Rubric]]<br>
[[Media:Paper_lead_rubric_575.docx|Rubric for Leading a Figure or Table in a Paper]]<br>


== Peer Grading ==
== Peer Grading ==
Line 34: Line 37:


== grants for review day ==
== grants for review day ==
[[Media:575_grantreview_1_2015.pdf | Group 1 Assigned Grant]]<br>
[[Media:575_grantreview_2_2015.pdf | Group 2 Assigned Grant]]<br>
[[Media:575_grantreview_3_2015.pdf | Group 3 Assigned Grant]]<br>
[[Media:575_grantreview_4_2015.pdf | Group 4 Assigned Grant]]<br>
[[Media:590B_summary_statement_sample.docx | Sample Grant Review Summary Statement]]<br>
[[Media:590B_summary_statement_sample.docx | Sample Grant Review Summary Statement]]<br>


== Grant Project ==
== Grant Project ==
Group 1: Singyuk Hou, Michael Mulroy, Kyle Pariseau, Brittany Shepler, Eric Stowe<br>
 
Group 2: Dan Ezra Aurian-Blajeni, Alpha Bamba, Michael Grunwald, Akarawin Hongdusit<br>
Group 3: Christine Davis, Bobbi Gaspardi, Jemima Lamothe, Thanh Nguyen, Cody Siroka<br>
Group 4: Jonathan Hummel, Sarah Johnson, Matt Tiller, Marco Yeung, Ronen Zeidel<br>
Groups 1 and 2 present on 4/23<br>
Groups 3 and 4 present on 4/28<br>
[[Media:590B_specific_aims_sample.docx | Sample Specific Aims Page]]<br>


== Due Dates ==
== Due Dates ==
'''NOTE:''' All wiki pages are due the day you present, by 4pm!<br>
'''NOTE:''' All wiki pages are due the day you present, by 10am!<br>
*3/31: Grant Review Day. Prepare your personal review (not to turn in) in order to participate in class on 3/31.  Scribe summary due (1 per group) by email to Prof. Peyton, 11:59pm, 3/31. <br>
*4/9: Specific Aims Page is Due.  By email to Prof. Peyton, 4pm. <br>
*5/1: Final Group Paper is Due.  By email to Prof. Peyton, 11:59pm. <br>

Latest revision as of 19:40, 15 February 2017

      Home                 Documents               Assignments               Wiki Schedule                 Wiki Pages                 Course Syllabus


Grading

This course will NOT BE CURVED.
Numerical grades will be assigned for each homework assignment, examination, and project.
Your final grade will be computed based on your performance in all aspects of the course with weights as follows:

Research Project 50%
Wiki Pages & Presentation 20%
In Class Literature Review 20%
In Class Problem Sets 10%
Problem Sets (10 total) will be scored 0, 1, or 2, for a maximum of 15 total possible points.

94-100 A
90-93 A-
87-89 B+
84-86 B
80-83 B-
77-79 C+
74-76 C
70-73 C-
60-69 D
0-59 F

Extra credit opportunities are available through extra wiki pages/presentations.

Grading Rubrics

Wiki Pages Grading Rubric
Wiki Presentation Grading Rubric
NIH Grant Grading Rubric
NIH Presentations Grading Rubric
Grant Review Day Summary Statement Grading Rubric
Rubric for Leading a Figure or Table in a Paper

Peer Grading

Peer Grading Forms

grants for review day

Sample Grant Review Summary Statement

Grant Project

Due Dates

NOTE: All wiki pages are due the day you present, by 10am!