Chris Rhodes Week 11

10 Terms

1. Obligate aerobes:
2. Hypoxia:
3. Exogenus:
4. Real Time PCR:
5. Chemostat:
6. Colony forming unit:

Outline

Introduction

• Mycobacteria have an extraordinary ability to adapt and survive in extreme conditions, but the exact mechanisms behind these adaptations is still fairly under-researched.
• Previous experiments have studied mycobacteria under conditions of low oxygen, nutrient starvation, and extended stationary phase but the accuracy and scope of their results have been limited by their methods of experimentation.
• This experiment hopes to better study the effects of extreme environments on mycobacteria by performing experiments using continuous cultures of Mycobacterium smegmatis
• The use of continuous cultures allows this experiment to study various environmental conditions while still being able to control and maintain the growth rate of the cultured bacteria.
• Previous studies by Beste et al. 2007 and Bacon et al. 2004 have implemented continuous cultures as a means of studying environmental effects on mycobacteria gene expression, but these experiments only studied the effects of a singular limiting factor i.e. low oxygen.
• There is yet to be a study that observes the effects that simultaneous conditions of low oxygen and carbon starvation have on the gene expressions of mycobacteria.
• The goal of this experiment is to study the effects that decreasing oxygen level has on the transcriptional response of a carbon-limited continuous culture of Mycobacterium smegmatis at varying growth rates.

Methods

Results

• Figure 1
  • A: Shows a graph of OD₆₀₀ representing bacterial growth and the level of glycerol in culture versus time. This shows that the rate at which glycerol levels decline (consumed by the cells) is proportional to the rate of cell growth in the culture. Glycerol is used as the carbon limiting agent meaning that glycerol levels represent the remaining the food supply of the culture. During steady state shown in the graph there is no longer cellular growth because the glycerol has been depleted.
  • B and C: Shows the fluorescent microscopy of the fast growing M. smeg (B) and the slow growing M. smeg (C). In the fast growing sample, the M. smeg cells are significantly longer (7X) and are fewer in number than the slow growing sample cells.
• Table 1: Shows a comparison of various conditions of each of the two culture growth rates including dilution rates, steady state OD₆₀₀, concentration of viable cells in culture, steady state glycerol concentrations, membrane potential, and proton motive force. The fast growing culture is represented by the dilution rate of 0.15 and the slow growing culture by the dilution rate of 0.01. The OD₆₀₀ and CFU respectively indicate the fast growing culture produces a larger amount of cells than does the slow growing culture, but the fast growing culture contains a smaller percentage of viable cells. The membrane potential and proton motive force indicate that despite the differences in cell viability and cell size between the two cultures, the resulting cells are energetically comparable.
• Figure 2:

Disscussion