DataONE:Notebook/Data Citation and Sharing Policy/2010/07/21: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Autocreate 2010/07/21 Entry for DataONE:Notebook/Data_Citation_and_Sharing_Policy)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
[[Category:DataONE]]  
[[Category:DataONE]]  


*'''[[User:Nic Weber|Nic Weber]] 12:02, 21 July 2010 (EDT)''': During our face to face, Todd talked about the need to quantify the rigidity of a policies data sharing "requirements" or "requests". I spent some time thinking about this for the morning...
For journals, of the 9 requiring data sharing,I think they fall into two categories:
0-Required, not enforced
1-Required, enforced
Also, the following seems appropriate-
0- Require but not specific about sharing process (where to archive, how to make available etc.)
1- Require, but give direction only for certain datatypes
2- Require and give direction for sharing process
I am going to look at "Requested" policies next.
*'''[[User:Nic Weber|Nic Weber]] 18:20, 21 July 2010 (EDT)''': I took my first crack at stats and posted my work on Gist: [git://gist.github.com/485192.git]
*For today I was mostly looking at the simple variable of the requested/ required field that Heather created for me, and using other variables to flesh out what seemed interesting.
*This was an incredibly helpful exercise in understanding how to clean up my data and how I might code things for futher analysis. And also motivating to do much better cleaner data gathering the first time around (doh!)
*Tomorrow, I'd like to open up the variables that I test, and maybe look at variables in the Repository or Funding Agencies datasets.
*I also need to spend more focused time formulating my hypothesis for looking at stats once I get more comfortable interpreting the frames that Heather is feeding me.
*I started to read a bit of the publications in Data Science Journal for beginning my paper abstract. I found one issue particularly helpful, in 2007, which was devoted to [http://www.codata.org/dsj/special-open-data.html Open Data]. I think we could make a strong case for our work updating a number of issues raised in that publication.
*I was pointed to a journal called Environmental Science and Policy as a possible publishing outlet. It seems like the scope entails studies done on environmental policy affecting society, but there was a one interesting, and realted [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VP6-4K48MG7-1&_user=10&_coverDate=08/31/2006&_alid=1407797552&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_cdi=6198&_sort=r&_docanchor=&view=c&_ct=392&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=3659f16eeb79527becbd701e12eb234a investigation of trans-disciplinary publishing policies] in environmental sciences in 2006. So there is some precedent for work like ours being published here


<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->

Revision as of 15:21, 21 July 2010

Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Entry title

  • Nic Weber 12:02, 21 July 2010 (EDT): During our face to face, Todd talked about the need to quantify the rigidity of a policies data sharing "requirements" or "requests". I spent some time thinking about this for the morning...

For journals, of the 9 requiring data sharing,I think they fall into two categories:

0-Required, not enforced 1-Required, enforced

Also, the following seems appropriate-

0- Require but not specific about sharing process (where to archive, how to make available etc.) 1- Require, but give direction only for certain datatypes 2- Require and give direction for sharing process

I am going to look at "Requested" policies next.


  • Nic Weber 18:20, 21 July 2010 (EDT): I took my first crack at stats and posted my work on Gist: [1]
  • For today I was mostly looking at the simple variable of the requested/ required field that Heather created for me, and using other variables to flesh out what seemed interesting.
  • This was an incredibly helpful exercise in understanding how to clean up my data and how I might code things for futher analysis. And also motivating to do much better cleaner data gathering the first time around (doh!)
  • Tomorrow, I'd like to open up the variables that I test, and maybe look at variables in the Repository or Funding Agencies datasets.
  • I also need to spend more focused time formulating my hypothesis for looking at stats once I get more comfortable interpreting the frames that Heather is feeding me.


  • I started to read a bit of the publications in Data Science Journal for beginning my paper abstract. I found one issue particularly helpful, in 2007, which was devoted to Open Data. I think we could make a strong case for our work updating a number of issues raised in that publication.
  • I was pointed to a journal called Environmental Science and Policy as a possible publishing outlet. It seems like the scope entails studies done on environmental policy affecting society, but there was a one interesting, and realted investigation of trans-disciplinary publishing policies in environmental sciences in 2006. So there is some precedent for work like ours being published here


Retrieved from "https://openwetware.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=DataONE:Notebook/Data_Citation_and_Sharing_Policy/2010/07/21&oldid=434772"