DataONE:Notebook/Reuse of repository data/2010/07/14: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Autocreate 2010/07/14 Entry for DataONE:Notebook/Reuse_of_repository_data)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
==Entry title==
==Notes for July 14, 2010==
* Insert content here...
*'''[[User:Valerie Enriquez|Valerie Enriquez]] 17:34, 14 July 2010 (EDT)''': Spent most of today finding the articles listed in [https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AgM1E1R2tI_6dHdGeEp1QWRURk50WTlRZ292ZGJ6ZUE&hl=en Bob's Spreadsheet] and looking to see what types of data citations they had, entering them in my new [https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AgM1E1R2tI_6dHlNM1NrNm8yZzBCUkdISDNjdkZiZGc&hl=en&authkey=CPnCpNsJ revised spreadsheet].
 
===Observations===
* Some articles are currently in press or otherwise not accessible via fulltext. I will need to ask Bob or the ORNL DAAC librarian for access.
* Even though the DOI is more or less ''right there'' in the recommended citation on the data page, it is not often referenced in the citation when it is added on the reference page. For example, [http://daac.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/dsviewer.pl?ds_id=780 this study] clearly has the following citation:
 
::Helmlinger, M., W. Buermann, and F. Eckardt. 2005. SAFARI 2000 Surface Spectral Reflectance at Sua Pan, Botswana, Dry Season 2000. Data set. Available on-line <nowiki>[http://daac.ornl.gov/]</nowiki> from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A. [http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/780 doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/780]
 
:However, [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005014 this article] cites the data author and repository name, but without adding the DOI.
* A lot of times, the dataset is not even mentioned in the reference section, but rather in the Introduction, Methods or Results section.
* At times, if the repository name was not mentioned, the author still referenced the project name (FLUXNET, BOREAS, NPP, etc.).
* A couple of articles had no clear mention of either repository name, author name, doi or anything identifying a dataset. I will also need to ask the ORNL DAAC librarian about this.
* Of course, I'm going to have to go through the sheet in a lot more detail and be more quantitative than "at times," "a lot of times," etc. before formulating my ideas and questions for the second draft of my paper.
 





Revision as of 14:34, 14 July 2010

Reuse of Repository Data <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Notes for July 14, 2010

Observations

  • Some articles are currently in press or otherwise not accessible via fulltext. I will need to ask Bob or the ORNL DAAC librarian for access.
  • Even though the DOI is more or less right there in the recommended citation on the data page, it is not often referenced in the citation when it is added on the reference page. For example, this study clearly has the following citation:
Helmlinger, M., W. Buermann, and F. Eckardt. 2005. SAFARI 2000 Surface Spectral Reflectance at Sua Pan, Botswana, Dry Season 2000. Data set. Available on-line [http://daac.ornl.gov/] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A. doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/780
However, this article cites the data author and repository name, but without adding the DOI.
  • A lot of times, the dataset is not even mentioned in the reference section, but rather in the Introduction, Methods or Results section.
  • At times, if the repository name was not mentioned, the author still referenced the project name (FLUXNET, BOREAS, NPP, etc.).
  • A couple of articles had no clear mention of either repository name, author name, doi or anything identifying a dataset. I will also need to ask the ORNL DAAC librarian about this.
  • Of course, I'm going to have to go through the sheet in a lot more detail and be more quantitative than "at times," "a lot of times," etc. before formulating my ideas and questions for the second draft of my paper.