DataONE:Stats/RecurrentEventRegression

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(initial content)
Current revision (17:16, 4 August 2010) (view source)
m (initial content)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Normal linear regression not good enough.  Was exploring censored negative binomial, but how about Andersen-Gill survival analysis instead?
+
Normal linear regression not good enough for modelling citations, especially when the papers are published across a wide span of years.  Was exploring censored negative binomial, but how about Andersen-Gill survival analysis instead?
Some papers in Mendeley:
Some papers in Mendeley:
Line 8: Line 8:
To be explored later, when I need it again...
To be explored later, when I need it again...
 +
 +
[[Category:DataONE]]

Current revision

Normal linear regression not good enough for modelling citations, especially when the papers are published across a wide span of years. Was exploring censored negative binomial, but how about Andersen-Gill survival analysis instead?

Some papers in Mendeley:


Mendeley citation generator

To be explored later, when I need it again...

Personal tools