DataONE:Stats/RecurrentEventRegression: Difference between revisions
(initial content) |
m (initial content) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Normal linear regression not good enough. Was exploring censored negative binomial, but how about Andersen-Gill survival analysis instead? | Normal linear regression not good enough for modelling citations, especially when the papers are published across a wide span of years. Was exploring censored negative binomial, but how about Andersen-Gill survival analysis instead? | ||
Some papers in Mendeley: | Some papers in Mendeley: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
To be explored later, when I need it again... | To be explored later, when I need it again... | ||
[[Category:DataONE]] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:16, 4 August 2010
Normal linear regression not good enough for modelling citations, especially when the papers are published across a wide span of years. Was exploring censored negative binomial, but how about Andersen-Gill survival analysis instead?
Some papers in Mendeley:
<html> <div style="padding:0;margin:0;text-align:left"><iframe src="http://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/collections/embed/3692861/A70805/" style="height:300px;width:450px;border:none;"></iframe><hr style="border:1px solid #E0E0E0;margin:0px 0px 5px 0px;padding:0;width:450px;"/><span style="color:#666666;font-size:11px;">Mendeley <a style="color:#A70805" href="http://www.mendeley.com/citation-generator-maker/">citation generator</a></span></div> </html>
To be explored later, when I need it again...
