Davidson Missouri W/Results

From OpenWetWare

< Davidson Missouri W
Revision as of 10:31, 13 March 2008 by Will Deloache (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Home | Background Information | Current Project: Solving the Hamiltonian Path Problem in vivo | Mathematical Modeling | Gene Splitting | Results | Traveling Salesperson Problem | Software | Resources and Citations


Contents

Gene Splitting Worked

We were able to split two genes: GFP and RFP. Split GFP has strong green fluorescence. Split RFP's red color is somewhat reduced compared to wild-type RFP. It takes overnight incubation at room temperature for the red color to be visible in white light. Both colors are fluorescent under UV light, although the green color predominates.

Figures 1 and 2: Split GFP (left) fluoresces green and split RFP (right) fluoresces red.
Figures 1 and 2: Split GFP (left) fluoresces green and split RFP (right) fluoresces red.

Image:linebreak.png

Graphs

Once we managed to split two genes, we proceeded to implement two different 3-node graphs into plasmids. These graphs were named Graphs A and B and are shown below. For each graph, we wanted to find a Hamiltonian Path from the node represented by RFP (colored in green) to the node represented by the transcriptional terminator (colored in red). The plasmid representation of Graph A is not be capable of flipping into a false positive orientation, while the plasmid representation of Graph B does provide that possibility.

Graph A: This graph contains 3-nodes and 3-edges. We wanted to find a Hamiltonian path from the node representing RFP (colored in green) to the node representing the transcriptional terminator (colored in red).
Graph A: This graph contains 3-nodes and 3-edges. We wanted to find a Hamiltonian path from the node representing RFP (colored in green) to the node representing the transcriptional terminator (colored in red).
Graph B: This graph also contains 3-nodes and 3-edges, however it provides the possibility of a false positive solution.
Graph B: This graph also contains 3-nodes and 3-edges, however it provides the possibility of a false positive solution.

Image:Linebreak.png Image:Linebreak.png Image:Linebreak.png

Starting Orientations

We constructed the following Hamiltonian Path Problem (HPP) constructs to test our bacterial computer system for Graphs A and B. Constructs that are built to solve Graph A are labeled HPP-A. Constructs that are built to solve Graph B are labeled HPP-B. A subscript equal to 0 denotes a plasmid in a solved orientation. A subscript that is greater than 0 denotes a plasmid that is in an unordered starting orientation.

  • HPP0 (Positive Control for HPP-A and HPP-B constructs)
    Image:Construct_1.png
  • HPP-A0 (Solved Orientation)
    Image:Construct_2.png
  • HPP-A1
    Image:Construct_3.png
  • HPP-A2
    Image:Construct_4.png
  • HPP-B1
    Image:Construct_5.png

Image:Linebreak.png

Controls

Because are graphs require that solved colonies be selected for by double fluorescence (both red and green), we first performed control experiments to ensure that we could distinguish solved and unsolved colonies. To test fluorescence phenotypes when both split GFP and split RFP are the same cell, we used our positive control constructs (HPP0 and HPP-A0) with split RFP and split GFP both downstream of the T7 polymerase promoter. In the presence of T7 polymerase, cells with the split RFP/GFP plasmid should demonstrate both green and red fluorescence.

We first tried cotransforming our HPP0 construct with a T7 RNA polymerase plasmid construct (BBa_I715038). As can be seen in Figure 3 below, this cotransformation resulted in bright green colonies that demonstrated minimal red fluorescence. When we measured the fluorescence of the cotransformed control, RFP was not present at detectable levels (See fluorescence data below).

We then tried transforming our HPP-A0 control plasmid into cells that already contained T7 polymerase in their chromosome (T7 RNAP cells). As can be seen in Figure 4 below, these colonies displayed the yellowish color we expected. Based on our fluorescence data, (shown below), we were able to show that GFP and RFP were present at detectable levels in this control. We hypothesize that the difference in the two controls is due to higher concentrations of T7 RNA polymerase in the T7 RNAP cells than in the cotransformants. We therefore used the T7 RNAP cells for future experiments.

Figure 3: Colonies containing both the T7 RNA polymerase plasmid and the HPP0 control plasmid demonstrated strong green fluorescence, but minimal red fluorescence.
Figure 3: Colonies containing both the T7 RNA polymerase plasmid and the HPP0 control plasmid demonstrated strong green fluorescence, but minimal red fluorescence.
Figure 4: T7 RNAP colonies that contain the HPP-A0 control plasmid demonstrated the expected yellow fluorescence.
Figure 4: T7 RNAP colonies that contain the HPP-A0 control plasmid demonstrated the expected yellow fluorescence.

Image:Linebreak.png

In addition to the regular split RFP/GFP controls, we also tested 2 "hybrid" constructs to ensure that they would not fluoresce. GFP and RFP have similar structures and functions. Previous studies have shown that it is possible to modify GFP to display a wide range of color phenotypes. We created the following parts: Plac-RBS-RFP1-hixC-GFP2 (BBa_I715036) and Plac-RBS-GFP1-hixC-RFP2 (BBa_I715035). A plasmid may, at some point during its flipping process, contain such sequences. We tested to make sure that the similarity of these two proteins did not make them compatible enough to fluoresce. It was found that neither of these parts show any fluorescence or color change (See fluorescence data below).

Image:Linebreak.png

Dectection of Fluoresence by Spectroscopy

We used a fluorometer to measure the fluorescence of various HPP constructs. First, we had to determine the excitation and emission wavelengths that would allow us to detect the green and red fluorescence of split genes. Scans were conducted in order to find these wavelengths. The graphs below show scans of excitation wavelengths that produce fluorescence at an emission wavelength of 515 nm , the wavelength we found to be best for green, and 608 nm, the best wavelength for red. We used these scans to pick a peak emission wavelength for further testing.

For these scans we used the following constructs:
pLac-RBS-GFP1-hixC-GFP2 - This construct fluoresces green on the UV box.
HPP-A0 - This construct fluoresces yellow on the UV box.
HPP-A1 - This construct fluoresces red on the UV box.
HPP-A2 - This construct shows no fluorescence on the UV box.

Excitation Spectra at an Emission Wavelength of 515 nm (green light)
Excitation Spectra at an Emission Wavelength of 515 nm (green light)
Excitation Spectra at an Emission Wavelength of 608 nm (red light)
Excitation Spectra at an Emission Wavelength of 608 nm (red light)


On the basis of these scans, we used excitation/emission wavelengths of 450 nm / 515 nm for green and 560 nm / 608 nm for red to obtain the results shown below.

Normalized* Fluorimetry Results

Construct Fluorescent Color on UV Box Green Red
pLac-RBS-RFP Red 7 263
pLac-RBS-RFP-RBS-GFP Red 144 370
pLac-RBS-GFP1-hixC-GFP2 Green 136 0
pLac-RBS-RFP1-hixC-RFP2 None 0 147
pLac-RBS-GFP1-hixC-RFP2 None 11 2
pLac-RBS-RFP1-hixC-GFP2 None 13 2
HPP0*** Green 72 18
HPP-A0 Yellow 340 255
HPP-A1 Red 1 143
HPP-A2 None 11 3
HPP-B1*** hybrid green 15 3

'* To normalize the data, 57 fluorescence units were subtracted from the Green column and 18 from the Red column. These were the lowest fluorescence values for each wavelength.
'*** These 2 constructs were cotransformed with the T7 RNA polymerase plasmid (as opposed to being transformed into T7 RNAP cells). This could explain their reduced fluorescence.


Solution Detected by Phenotype

To test for flipping by phenotype, we used our 3 - Graph A constructs from above, HPP-A0, HPP-A1, HPP-A2. As expected, unflipped HPP-A0 fluoresced yellow, unflipped HPP-A1 fluoresced red, and unflipped HPP-A2 demonstrated no fluorescence when transformed into the T7 RNAP cells (See Figures 5-7 below).

A fragment containing the Hin expression cassette (pLac-RBS-Hin-LVA, BBa_S03536) was ligated in front of each of the 3 HPP-A constructs. These HPP-A + Hin plasmids were then transformed into T7 RNAP cells. A colony from each transformation was picked and grown overnight for plasmid mini-prep. Each of the 3 constructs was restriction digested and the insert sizes were verified to be correct. The 3 constructs were then retransformed into T7 RNAP cells, and the resulting transformation mixture was streaked for colony isolation. The HPP-A0 + Hin plate contained mostly yellow colonies but also red and green (See Figures 8 and 11). The Hin HPP-A1 + Hin plate contained red, green and yellow colonies (See Figures 9 and 12). The HPP-A2 + Hin plate contained mostly nonfluorescent colonies with a few green and red colonies (See Figures 10 and 13).


Click twice on the images below for higher resolution.

Figure 5: HPP-A0 - These colonies fluoresced yellow
Figure 5: HPP-A0 - These colonies fluoresced yellow
Figure 6: HPP-A1 - These colonies fluoresced red
Figure 6: HPP-A1 - These colonies fluoresced red
Image:linebreak.png
Figure 7: HPP-A2 - These colonies do not fluoresce
Figure 7: HPP-A2 - These colonies do not fluoresce
Figure 8: HPP-A0 + Hin - The addition of Hin has produced green, red, and yellow colonies
Figure 8: HPP-A0 + Hin - The addition of Hin has produced green, red, and yellow colonies
Image:linebreak.png
Figure 9: HPP-A1 + Hin - The addition of Hin has produced green, red, and yellow colonies
Figure 9: HPP-A1 + Hin - The addition of Hin has produced green, red, and yellow colonies
Figure 10: HPP-A2 + Hin - The addition of Hin has produced green and red colonies
Figure 10: HPP-A2 + Hin - The addition of Hin has produced green and red colonies
Image:linebreak.png
Figure 11: HPP-A0 + Hin - closeup of Figure 8
Figure 11: HPP-A0 + Hin - closeup of Figure 8
Figure 12: HPP-A1 + Hin - closeup of Figure 9
Figure 12: HPP-A1 + Hin - closeup of Figure 9
Image:linebreak.png
Figure 13: HPP-A2 + Hin - closeup of Figure 10
Figure 13: HPP-A2 + Hin - closeup of Figure 10
Figure 14: HPP-A0 + Hin
Figure 14: HPP-A0 + Hin
Image:linebreak.png
Figure 15: HPP-A1 + Hin
Figure 15: HPP-A1 + Hin
Figure 16: HPP-A2 + Hin
Figure 16: HPP-A2 + Hin
Image:linebreak.png
Figure 16: HPP-A0 + Hin
Figure 16: HPP-A0 + Hin
Figure 17: HPP-A1 + Hin
Figure 17: HPP-A1 + Hin
Image:linebreak.png
Figure 18: HPP-A2 + Hin
Figure 18: HPP-A2 + Hin

Image:Linebreak.png

Solution Detected by PCR

In order to provide physical evidence of Hin-mediated DNA rearrangement of our HPP-A + Hin constructs, we designed PCR primers that would allow us to determine the position of the GFP2 gene half. The experiment below shows the results of PCR using the following multiplex primers: the universal reverse primer G00101, which binds to the 3' biobrick suffix, a forward primer that binds to RFP1, and a GFP2-forward primer.

Here is how the primers bind to the 3 HPP-A constructs:

PCR Primer Binding: (from top to bottom) HPP-A0, HPP-A1, HPP-A2
PCR Primer Binding: (from top to bottom) HPP-A0, HPP-A1, HPP-A2


Lane 1 : MW marker (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1400/1550, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 bp), Lanes 2 : HPP-A0, Lanes 3 : HPP-A1, Lanes 4 : HPP-A2, Lanes 5 : Hin+HPP-A0, Lanes 6 : Hin+HPP-A1, Lanes 7 : Hin+HPP-A2
Lane 1 : MW marker (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1400/1550, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 bp), Lanes 2 : HPP-A0, Lanes 3 : HPP-A1, Lanes 4 : HPP-A2, Lanes 5 : Hin+HPP-A0, Lanes 6 : Hin+HPP-A1, Lanes 7 : Hin+HPP-A2


Left Gel - Lane 1 : MW marker (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1400/1550, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 bp), Lanes 2,3 : ClaI digest of Hin+HPP-A0, Lanes 4,5 : ClaI digest of Hin+HPP-A1, Lanes 6,7 : ClaI digest of Hin+HPP-A2 Right Gel - Lane 1 : MW marker (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1400/1550, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 bp), Lane 2 : unrelated digest, Lane 3 : EcoRI+PstI digest of Hin+HPP-A0, Lane 4 : unrelated digest, Lane 5 : EcoRI+PstI digest of Hin+HPP-A1, Lane 6 : unrelated digest, Lane 7 : EcoRI+PstI digest of Hin+HPP-A2
Left Gel - Lane 1 : MW marker (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1400/1550, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 bp), Lanes 2,3 : ClaI digest of Hin+HPP-A0, Lanes 4,5 : ClaI digest of Hin+HPP-A1, Lanes 6,7 : ClaI digest of Hin+HPP-A2
Right Gel - Lane 1 : MW marker (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1400/1550, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 bp), Lane 2 : unrelated digest, Lane 3 : EcoRI+PstI digest of Hin+HPP-A0, Lane 4 : unrelated digest, Lane 5 : EcoRI+PstI digest of Hin+HPP-A1, Lane 6 : unrelated digest, Lane 7 : EcoRI+PstI digest of Hin+HPP-A2



Image:Linebreak.png

Image:Linebreak.png

Conclusions

We were able to insert a 13 amino acid hixC site into Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP), maintaining the functionality of the proteins and allowing for flipping of the DNA by Hin Recombinase. When both split RFP and split GFP are present in the same cell, a yellow color can be observed by eye under UV light, and both red and green fluorescence are detected by fluorimetry. We then constructed a bacterial computer capable of solving a 3-node Hamiltonian Path Problem. We detected the solution by isolating cells that fluoresced yellow (both red and green).

To test for flipping of our HPP computer constructs, we attatched a Hin-expression vector to the HPP construct and observed phenotypic differences in colonies. For all of the starting orientations, we observed colonies of varying colors, suggesting that some colonies had flipped away from their starting orientation and into a new orientation that produced a different phenotype. We also tested for flipping by PCR and were able to see multiple bands for all of our flipped constructs. These results indicate that flipping has occured in each of our HPP constructs.

In the coming days, we plan to retransform our flipped HPP plasmid (with Hin-Recombinase removed from the plasmid) into T7 RNAP cells in order to obtain clonal colonies. We will screen for yellow colonies and sequencing any plasmids to verify correct solutions to the Hamiltonian Path Problem and solved by E. coli.



< Previous Section | Next Section>

Personal tools