Drosophila 16S Paper: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


= Scientific Questions for Thought/Discussion =
= Scientific Questions for Thought/Discussion =
[[Media:79_9Categories.pdf]]


= Table of all Samples Sequenced =
= Table of all Samples Sequenced =

Revision as of 10:44, 15 April 2009

Data Files

Technical Questions for Thought/Discussion

  • how will Bellerophon handle incomplete sequences? Does the type of incompleteness matter, i.e. hole in the middle vs. only one half of the clone?

Media:Lab_unclassifieds.pdf

  • So here is a graph of the number of unclassified clones in all of our laboratory samples. The overall question will be what do we do with these clones, and just looking at our lab samples is a good place to start. It is hard for me to imagine that this level of "unclassified" organisms results because they are actually novel or not found in greengenes. This is more likely a technical problem. As an example, DO and DM are both melanogaster on lab media, however the discrepancy between them is hardly trivial.

Overall, what we are to do with libraries like this, or with individual unclassified clones, is a question that I think needs to be resolved before we can get any credible information from the "classified" clones.

Scientific Questions for Thought/Discussion

Media:79_9Categories.pdf

Table of all Samples Sequenced

Media:SurveySequencedTable.xls

Pretty self explanatory, but here is a table of all the libraries for which we have sequence data. The first column is the identifier that I will be using in all of my graphs and communications.

Outline

Summary/Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results

Discussion

Current Status

Jonathan

I can edit too

Artyom Just testing - looks like I can edit?

Jenna <- click here to see what I'm up to!

Angus