Endy:Data storage: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
*[http://www.infrant.com/products/products_details.php?name=ReadyNAS%20NV ReadyNAS NV] | *[http://www.infrant.com/products/products_details.php?name=ReadyNAS%20NV ReadyNAS NV] | ||
*[http://www.infrant.com/products/products_details.php?name=ReadyNAS%20NVPlus ReadyNAS NV+] | *[http://www.infrant.com/products/products_details.php?name=ReadyNAS%20NVPlus ReadyNAS NV+] | ||
*[http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/29829/75/ Infrant ReadyNAS NV+ and 1100: Small steps forward] - review |
Revision as of 12:27, 29 January 2007
1. The problem, briefly stated
We need an easy, secure and efficient way to store all our files:
- individual user files (backup)
- shared project files (centralized storage and backup)
- old user and project files (centralized storage and backup)
2. Current specifications our backup system
Most people use Bionet to backup their files.
Bionet
- Storage space (as of 2007-01-16):
- total: 110GB
- used: 86GB
- available: 24GB
- Where is it physically located?
- Building 68, 3rd floor
- Are Bionet files regularly copied and stored somewhere else?
- Yes, to the MIT datacenter in W91.
- Problems with Bionet:
- Not enough space to backup all our files e.g. microscope images
- Isn't Bionet not going to be backed up anymore?
- This is currently (2007-01-23) unknown, will depend on the allocated budget.
3. Ideal specifications of our future backup system
(lab and individual data storage, sharing and backup needs - please list what would you like have available)
- Capacity: we want to be able to store all files in a single location
- Easy: automatic backup
- Secure: the backup system shouldn't be located in building 68, in case of a fire
- Efficient backing up or retrieving files should be speedy
- Affordable
Types of data
- Individual user data
- active:
- stored on: Bionet (easy to access, backed up), some on lab computers
- size: ?
- inactive:
- stored on: Bionet (easy to access, backed up), some on lab computers, including shmoo (~10GB?)
- size: ?
- active:
- Project data
- active:
- stored on: Bionet (easy to access, backed up)
- size: ?
- inactive:
- stored on: Bionet (easy to access, backed up)
- size: ?
- active:
- Microscope data
- stored on: lab computer
- size: 170GB
4. Potential solutions
The win.mit.edu Domain
MIT TSM Backup Service
- Monthly service charge: $7.50 per month per computer
- Storage limit: 300GB
- a soft limit, some users go over
- an approximate figure because it includes both "active" and "inactive" files but this is offset by data compression
- TSM software is required to use the service and is available for Windows, Mac and Linux (free to MIT community per site license)
- Backups are stored on one of the TSM backup servers in buildings W91 and E40 (not redundant)
- Types of backup:
- Scheduled: everything by default but can be configured to exclude directories
- Manual: nothing by default, need to specify which directories to backup
- Inactive files (old versions of current files and deleted files) are kept for 30 days using incremental storage (only changes are stored)
- Need a separate account for each computer to be backed up
- Performance will vary, depending on time of the day, network condition and machine itself)
- 5,000 users, 250,000 files restored per quarter
- 128-bit encryption available
- coming soon (summer of 2007 at the earliest):
- free service (for personal use): 10-20GB
- enhanced service (for DLC use): 1TB and up, offsite mirroring, will be expensive, etc
Misc
Network Attached Storage
A Tale of Two Terabyte NAS Boxes
Buffalo Technology
- Buffalo TeraStation Home
- Example disk configuration: 4 x 250GB IDE (750GB in RAID5)
- Protocols: FTP, SMB
- USB 2.0 port for external hard drive (backup or additional storage)
- Review by PC Magazine
- Bottom line: Flexible and reliable storage for everyone on your network. Print sharing is a plus, as is expandable USB disk storage.
- Pros: Offers RAID level data protection; easy-to-configure shared and private storage for all workgroup members; print sharing is a plus.
- Cons: Large footprint. No logging or reporting features.
- Review by ExtremeTech
- TeraStation wiki
- Buffalo TeraStation Pro
- Released in March 2006
- S-ATA drives