Endy:F2620/Data Processing/Algorithm: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Background subtraction==
We subtracted a media background, <math>A_{media}</math>, from the raw absorbance data, <math>A_{raw}</math>, and assumed that the resulting data, <math>A_{corrected}</math>, was directly proportional to the number of cells in the well. 
{|width="720px" align="center"
|width="100px"|
|align="center"|<math>\frac{}{}A_{corrected} = A_{raw}-A_{media}</math>
|align="right" width="100px"|...Equation 1
|}
We subtracted a fluorescent protein-free cell background, <math>G_{cells}</math>, from the the raw fluorescent data, <math>G_{raw}</math>, and assumed that the resulting data <math>G_{corrected}</math> was proportional to the total number of GFP molecules in the well [''include note here about immature GFP?''].
{|width="720px" align="center"
|width="100px"|
|align="center"|<math>\frac{}{}G_{corrected} = G_{raw}-G_{cells}</math>
|align="right" width="100px"|...Equation 2
|}
==Unit conversion==
We then used standard calibration curves (see here for absorbance and here for fluorescence) to convert the background-corrected data into absolute units (CFU/well and GFP molecules per well).  The calibration equations used are shown in Equations 3 & 4.
{|width="720px" align="center"
|width="100px"|
|align="center"|<math>\frac{}{}CFU = 3.1e8 * A_{corrected} - 1.6e6</math>
|align="right" width="100px"|...Equation 3
|-
|width="100px"|
|align="center"|<math>\frac{}{}GFP = 7.0e8 * G_{corrected} + 6.0e11</math>
|align="right" width="100px"|...Equation 4
|}
==GFP synthesis rate calculations==
To calculate the mean synthesis rate of GFP per cell, <math>S_{cell}</math>, we assume the total GFP synthesis rate is equal to the time differential of <math>GFP</math>.  <math>S_{cell}</math> can be calculated as the total synthesis rate divided by <math>CFU</math>. 
{|width="720px" align="center"
|width="100px"|
|align="center"|<math>\frac{}{}S_{total} = \frac{d[GFP]}{dt}</math>
|align="right" width="100px"|...Equation 5
|-
|width="100px"|
|align="center"|<math>\frac{}{}S_{cell} = \frac{S_{total}}{CFU}</math>
|align="right" width="100px"|...Equation 6
|}
==Ania's c++ code==
* Load the data from the excel file. Read headers of the column to know the colony number and AHL type used. Form a lookup table. Separate the medium column at this point. Count how many repeats there is for each type.
* Load the data from the excel file. Read headers of the column to know the colony number and AHL type used. Form a lookup table. Separate the medium column at this point. Count how many repeats there is for each type.
* Find the GFP background by finding the non-induced column
* Find the GFP background by finding the non-induced column

Latest revision as of 16:08, 24 September 2006

Background subtraction

We subtracted a media background, [math]\displaystyle{ A_{media} }[/math], from the raw absorbance data, [math]\displaystyle{ A_{raw} }[/math], and assumed that the resulting data, [math]\displaystyle{ A_{corrected} }[/math], was directly proportional to the number of cells in the well.

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{}{}A_{corrected} = A_{raw}-A_{media} }[/math] ...Equation 1

We subtracted a fluorescent protein-free cell background, [math]\displaystyle{ G_{cells} }[/math], from the the raw fluorescent data, [math]\displaystyle{ G_{raw} }[/math], and assumed that the resulting data [math]\displaystyle{ G_{corrected} }[/math] was proportional to the total number of GFP molecules in the well [include note here about immature GFP?].

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{}{}G_{corrected} = G_{raw}-G_{cells} }[/math] ...Equation 2

Unit conversion

We then used standard calibration curves (see here for absorbance and here for fluorescence) to convert the background-corrected data into absolute units (CFU/well and GFP molecules per well). The calibration equations used are shown in Equations 3 & 4.

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{}{}CFU = 3.1e8 * A_{corrected} - 1.6e6 }[/math] ...Equation 3
[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{}{}GFP = 7.0e8 * G_{corrected} + 6.0e11 }[/math] ...Equation 4

GFP synthesis rate calculations

To calculate the mean synthesis rate of GFP per cell, [math]\displaystyle{ S_{cell} }[/math], we assume the total GFP synthesis rate is equal to the time differential of [math]\displaystyle{ GFP }[/math]. [math]\displaystyle{ S_{cell} }[/math] can be calculated as the total synthesis rate divided by [math]\displaystyle{ CFU }[/math].

[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{}{}S_{total} = \frac{d[GFP]}{dt} }[/math] ...Equation 5
[math]\displaystyle{ \frac{}{}S_{cell} = \frac{S_{total}}{CFU} }[/math] ...Equation 6


Ania's c++ code

  • Load the data from the excel file. Read headers of the column to know the colony number and AHL type used. Form a lookup table. Separate the medium column at this point. Count how many repeats there is for each type.
  • Find the GFP background by finding the non-induced column
  • GFPpre-fit by fitting all the GFP background columns
  • Fit medium for OD (find mean)
  • For each OD subtract this mean (media)
  • For each GFP we subtract the fitted background calculated for non-induced cells of this type (e.g. for cog-AHL we subtract fitted results for non induced cog-AHL from the raw data)
  • Calibrate GFP relative units to conc of GFP (from Barry's calibration run): 1.16*10e-6*GFP+9.95*10e-4
  • Fit GFP
  • Fit OD (don't fit media anymore)
  • Plot GFP, GFP/OD, dOD/dt, gamma, (GFP/OD)/dT, total sythesis and output (this is for debugging and outputs a huge .pdf and .tex)
  • to params.csv outputs all the fitting parameters and errors (the errors are not really important)
  • to surfaces.tsv output points for superimposed transfer functions in 3D (so you can plot the 3D surfaces yourself)
  • evaluate the fitting equations for the total synthesis at many timepoints and select the hightest value from cog-AHL and store this time value.
  • output to transfer.tsv all values of total function for all series at time calculated above and low/high repeat, st dev (Mathworld definition, I think it is what you call standard error), 95% confidence
  • plot using gnuplot 3D superimposed lines "ser*.pdf" files (we don't use them anymore) surfaces (those are the green ones we post on wiki) into files "sersurf*.pdf") and the transfer functions to "tranfer.pdf" with 95% confidence intervals, transferlh.pdf transfer functions with low/high errors, where * is series number

Notes: 1. Evaluation of the total synthesis function is done using arbitrary precision numbers. B/c they exceeded double range