Endy:Victor3 plate reader/Calibrating the GFP-separated label
|Line 13:||Line 13:|
*F2620-pSB3k3 in MG1655 grown in [[Knight:M9 supplemented media|supplemented M9 media]] overnight and diluted back 1/500. Once the cell reach an OD of around 0.7 we induce 5ml of the culture. Every 10 mins we
*F2620-pSB3k3 in MG1655 grown in [[Knight:M9 supplemented media|supplemented M9 media]] overnight and diluted back 1/500. Once the cell reach an OD of around 0.7 we induce 5ml of the culture . Every 10 mins we another 5ml of the culture. amounts of GFP per cell. The ODs of all the cultures were similar after the 60 mins. These samples were then lysed according to the method below. the were used to dilute the purified GFP.
Revision as of 15:37, 28 June 2006
It would be desirable to be able to relate the relative fluorescent measurements that we obtain from the plate reader to actual molecule numbers per cell. This would facilitate comparison of results from the plate reader with measurements from other machines. You can read more about standardizing GFP measurements here. This page describes the process to calibrate GFP counts using the GFP-separated label on the Endy lab plate reader to GFP concentration. This calibration was undertaken as part of the project to characterize F2620.
We chose to calibrate the GFP counts from experimental samples to a concentration of purified GFP in the well of a 96-well plate. It is not possible to do this calibration directly, as the quantum efficiency of purified GFP in solution may be different from GFP in vivo. The approach we took was to first calibrate GFP from experimental samples to the GFP counts of lysed samples from the same original culture. Next, we measured a standard curve relating the concentration of purified GFP in non-fluorescent cell lysate to GFP counts. These two sets of calibration data can then be combined to produce a calibration from GFP counts for experimental samples to GFP concentration.
Materials & Methods
As a gold standard, we obtained a purified sample of GFP from Jennifer Braff and the Sauer Lab (all of which should be folded due to the purification process). The concentration of GFP in the sample had been measured using a nanodrop and was ~120μM. Jennifer Braff had diluted the GFP into pH 5 H2O water. Since we needed the GFP to be correctly folded we needed to dilute the concentrated stock into a neutral pH buffer. I believe we used TE(check).
- F2620-pSB3k3 in MG1655 grown in supplemented M9 media overnight and diluted back 1/500. Once the cell reach an OD of around 0.7 we induce 5ml of the culture by adding AHL to a concentration of 100nM. Every 10 mins for the next hour we induce another 5ml of the culture. This produces a set of cultures with different amounts of GFP per cell. The ODs of all the cultures were similar after the 60 mins. These samples were then lysed according to the method below. Cells not expressing GFP that were grown and lysed in an identical manner to the receiver cells were used to dilute the purified GFP.
We looked into a few different ways of lysing the cells without denaturing too much of the GFP. On the recommendation of Sean Moore, we settled on B-Per II sold by Pierce as it seemed to be a quick and easy protocol that was sufficiently gentle to not denature the protein overly. Sean Moore had good experience with B-Per II and gave us a modified protocol based on the manufacturers protocol. We made some small modifications to that protocol to get reproducible results in our hands.
- We started with E. coli grown in supplemented M9 media to an OD of 0.86.
- Incubate samples on ice for 10mins.
- Centrifuge all samples at room temp. for 6mins at 9000rpm using a tabletop centrifuge.
- Remove supernatant.
- Resuspend the sample pellet in Tris (10mM, 100mM NaCl, pH 8).
- Repeat steps 3 and 4.
- Resuspend cells in 50μl B-Per II.
- Add 1 unit Benzonase per 1ml of culture.
- Incubate at room temperature for 30mins.
This should lead to >90% lysis according to earlier plating experiments.
Although the results are quoted in different units, both of these experiments seems to give good agreement. This is good since the experimenter was different and the source of purified GFP was also different.
Some improvements could still be made to the protocol which might merit further repitition of the experiment.