Endy: PTL Logic: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:




At first glance, it would seem
Tthe most intuitive definition of a PTL device

Revision as of 13:06, 12 January 2006

I am working to develop a new type of logic, called Post-Translational Logic, or PTL. PTL devices regulate the post-translational modifications of proteins to define system state and control cell function.

Current synthetic biological circuits make use of protein-DNA and RNA-RNA interactions to control gene expression in bacteria-- such circuits are Protein-DNA logic, or PDL. A brief comparison of the two types of logic is as follows:

PDL

  • Engineered around gene expression
  • Typical parts: transcriptional regulators, translational regulators
  • Typical signal: PoPS, resulting in desired cellular concentrations of proteins.
  • Easier to engineer than PTL
  • Slow response time (hours)
  • Uses one subset of cellular functions

PTL

  • Engineered around protein modifications
  • Typical parts: kinases, phosphorylation sites, docking sites
  • Typical signa: rate of modification, resulting in desired state of proteins.
  • More difficult to engineer than PDL
  • Fast response time (seconds)
  • Explores a new set of applications


In designing PTL logic, I am working to answer the following questions:

  • What is a PTL part?
  • What is a PTL device?
  • What signals are passed between devices?
  • What are device performance specifications?


Below I will describe some of my ideas.


Tthe most intuitive definition of a PTL device