Griffin:Lentivirus Technology

Lentiviral Transduction

Lentiviral Particles

Lentivirus belonging to the Retroviridae family are ~80-100 nm diameter spherical particles with envelope/coat (YELLOW) containing an array of ~8 nm spikes (GREEN) capable of recognizing/infecting a host cell, then additional components mediate integration of viral-borne code (RED) into the unsuspecting host genome/DNA.

Lentiviral particles are highly efficient at infection and stable integration of the shRNA into a cell system. To obtain the lentiviral particle, the transfer vector that contains the shRNA cassette is already flanked by LTRs and the Psi-sequence of HIV. LTRs are necessary to integrate the shRNA cassette into the genome of the target cell, just as the LTRs in HIV integrate the dsDNA copy of the virus into its host chromosome. The Psi-sequence signal sequence is necessary for packaging shRNA into pseudovirus particles. Viral shell proteins are cotransfected into the packaging cell line (HEK 293T), so they are separate from the LTRs and Psi-sequences, and so are not packaged into virions. Third generation lentivirus particles for this reason (and others) are replication deficient. Lentiviral particles can infect both dividing and nondividing cells because their preintegration complex (virus “shell”) can get through the intact membrane of the nucleus of target cells.

• Lentiviral systems efficiently transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells
• Study long-term gene knockdown with stable expression
• Reproducibly transduce cell populations
• Inducible or constitutive gene knockdown

Lentiviral Technical Guide

Measure transduction efficiency

• Transduction in what cell type?
• Primary cell or Continuous/immortal cell?
• Is this cell type known to have tropism for VSV-G coat protein?
• How is transduction efficiency measured for tropism to VSV-G?
• If a copGFP expressing Lentivirus was used to measure tropism, at what time point was transduction efficiency of the copGFP Control Lentiviral Particles or other reporter measured?
• How was the reporter gene measured? (FCM, IF, other)

Multiplicity of Infection (MOI)

X = How many cell count was transduced?

NOTE: A hemocytometer is common for this step; originally designed for performing blood cell counts

Y = How many uL of virus was used?

MOI = X / (Y * (particles/uL))

NOTE:HEK293T and other easy to transduce cells (MOI of 5-20), while neuronal cells,SHSY5Y, may require MOI of 10-50.

Puromycin Selection

• How many [ug/ml] puromycin is added post transduction?
• How was optimum puromycin concentration determined?

NOTE: Use the lowest concentration that kills 100% of non-transfected cells in 3-5 days from the start of puromycin selection (normal range; 1-10 ug/ml)

• Western blot, IF or Quantitative RT-PCR?
• Negative controls (empty virus, no virus)?

Lentivirus Transduction Protocol

Day 1:

• Plate continuous (immortal/transformed) cells (2.5x10^4) in 12 well dishes in 1mL of normal growth media (ie RPMI/10%FCS/penn&strep, DMEM/5%FBS/penn&strep).

Day 2:

• Rinse cells, and add back 0.5 mL normal growth medium.
• Add 0.5 uL of 1000x polybrene (hexadimethrine bromide) OR other Transduction Enhancement
• Try 3 different MOI; stock virus is 10e6 particles/200 ul = 5000 particles/ul

• MOI=3; (25,000 cells*3) /(5000 particles/ul) = 15 ul of virus
• MOI=6; (25,000 cells*6) /(5000 particles/ul) = 30 ul of virus
• MOI=10; (25,000 cells*10)/(5000 particles/ul) = 50 ul of virus

Day 3

• Rinse off virus and replace with normal growth cell media. 48 hours post transduction cells can undergo analysis and/or proceed with puromycin selection. There may be too few cells for qPCR or WB analysis at this step.

Day 4

• Add selection (1ug/mL Puromycin), and split cells into either 10 cm or T75 flasks containing selection.
• After 1 passage, in which non-infected cells die off in selection media (control wells that were not treated with virus), perform RNA isolation and PCR for target gene and/or immunoglobulin-based detection.
• Prepare LN2 stock once the mRNA or protein knockdown phenotype is observed. Passage durations may vary for stable gene knockdown. Monitor passage number and thaw stock accordingly to operate in the appropriate passage range for the desired knockdown phenotype.

Multiplicity of infection (MOI)

MOI values for cell types

Multiplicity of infection (MOI) is a parameter for viral infectivity in a population of target cells. With wild type viruses, an infectious unit (IFU) refers to the smallest unit of virus capable of infection in a susceptible cell. Titer of viral suspension is the number of IFUs per unit volume.

Multiplicity of infection (MOI) is the ratio of transfer vector transducing particles to cells. An MOI of 10 indicates that there are ten transducing units for every cell in the well. It is important to note that different cell types may require different MOIs for successful transduction and knockdown of the target gene. For instance, HEK293T cells are highly susceptible to lentiviral transduction (MOI of 5-20) while neuronal cells such as SHSY5Y often require higher MOIs of 10-50.

In most cases of transducing 42 different human cancer cell lines, MOI 3 yielded 50-90 % transduction efficiency with both vectors. In vivo studies with nude mouse s.c. tumor model (A549 lung cancer cells) revealed that lentiviruses were more efficient vehicles than adenoviruses when same amount of virus was used Molecular Therapy (2004) 9, S281.

200 uL containing 1e6 particles = 5,000 particles/uL

• HEK293= 5-10 particles/cell
• SHSY5Y= 10-50 particles/cell

When transducing a lentiviral construct into a cell line for the first time, a range of volume or MOI should be tested.

Calculate MOI (MOI= viral titer/cell number)

(# cells) x (Desired MOI; typically 5-20) = Total # Particles

(# Particles) / (# cells) = MOI

NOTE

• Sensitivity of cells to lentivirus is MOI-dependent; the higher the MOI, the higher the transduction efficiency.
• Transduction efficiency is highest with the smallest cell number and largest viral volume eg: a thirty-fold increase in cell numbers resulted in a 53% decrease in efficiency (PMID 15291957)

Transduction Enhancement

Spin Infection

An effective method for high efficiency viral transduction of suspension cells; spin infection can significantly enhance Lentivirus transduction.

NOTE Use of polybrene (4-8 ug/ml) during a spin infection can enhance transduction. Determination of polycation tolerance is relevant & usually in the range of 4-8 µg/ml for cultured cells.

NOTE Hard to tranduce adherent cells may benefit from spin infection. Trypsin-EDTA detachment may influence cell viability.

• Transduce cells in a multi-well plate or conical tube spun at 800 x g (< 2500 rpm) for 90 minutes at 33-37 C immediately following the addition of virus @ MOI 1-10.

• Either a swinging bucket centrifuge with 15 ml conical or an adaptor for spinning multi-well plates at 800 x g (< 2500 rpm) at 37C (or room temp) is necessary to spin infection.

Polycation Polybrene: 10 mg/ml, Store @ –20°C

Polycations such as Polybrene and protamine sulfate can increase gene transfer efficiency by facilitating interaction between negatively charged Viral particles and their target cells.

Polybrene

Polybrene; 1,5-dimethyl-1,5-diazaundecamethylene polymethobromide, hexadimethrine bromide.

Polybrene (hexadimethrine bromide) can increase efficiency of retroviral infection of certain cells in culture. Polybrene neutralizies the charge repulsion between virions and sialic acid on the cell surface.

Polybrene is a small positive charged molecule that binds to cell surfaces and neutralizes surface charge, increases binding between pseudoviral capsid and the cellular membrane; and greatly enhances transduction efficiency. This treatment enhances transduction of most cell types by 2-10 fold.

Concentration of Polybrene depends on cell type (usually in the range of 4-8 µg/ml).

Certain cell types (ie primary neurons, terminally differentiated neurons, and dendritic cells) are sensitive to Polybrene. Titration of polybrene using 2, 4, 6, 8 ug/ml can determine the highest nontoxic concentration. Cells can be transduced in the absence of polybrene at a higher MOI or use Protamine Sulfate.

Polycation Protamine Sulfate

Protamine Sulfate

Target cells can be infected by adding virus-containing supernatant or purified, concentrated virus diluted in media in the presence of polybrene (5ug/mL) or protamine sulfate (8ug/mL).

Cells should be infected in multi-well plates and then spun at 2500RPM for 90 minutes at 30degress immediately following addition of virus. Spin infection significantly enhances infectivity.

1. Cornetta K and Anderson WF. Protamine sulfate as an effective alternative to polybrene in retroviral-mediated gene-transfer: implications for human gene therapy. J Virol Methods. 1989 Feb;23(2):187-94. DOI:10.1016/0166-0934(89)90132-8 |

Fibronectin

Enhancement of the cell adhesion to the plate by pre-treating the plate with fibronectin can improve transduction.

• Fibronectin stock solution dilute in sterile PBS to 5 μg/mL
• Add 3.0 mL per well. Incubate plate(s) at 37 ºC for 1.5 hours
• Rinse each well 2× with 2.0 mL complete medium before adding cells.
• Add Cells and viral particles in complete medium containing 8 μg/mL polybrene

Puromycin Selection

Puromycin dihydrochloride is a aminonuclease antibiotic that inhibits protein synthesis. Puromycin is used for selection and maintenance of cell lines expressing a transfected pac gene (S. alboniger), whose product, puromycin acetyltransferase, inactivates puromycin via acetylation; recommended concentration in cell culture 1-10µg/ml. Lot-to-lot variations in potency exist for all selection antibiotics, each new lot of puromycin should be titrated. The working puromycin concentration for mammalian cell lines ranges from 1-10 µg/ml. Prior to using the puromycin antibiotic, titrate the selection agent to determine the optimal concentration for target cell line. Use the lowest concentration that kills 100% of non-transfected cells in 3-5 days from the start of puromycin selection.

Depending on individual cell type and doubling rate, selection of stable transfectants will take between 7 and 28 days. Expansion and characterization of single cell clones will take several weeks in addition. Media should be changed out every 2-3 days. This eliminates potentially toxic substances produced by dying cells and secondly, it keeps the concentration of the antibiotic at a constant level.

• Approximately every 2-3 days post transduction, aspirate and replace with freshly prepared selective media.
• Monitor the cells daily. Puromycin selection requires a minimum of 48 hours.
• Optimum effectiveness should be reached within 3-10 days.

Suggested working conditions for selection in some mammalian cells:

• Hela human uterus: 3 µg/ml
• HEK293 human embryonic kidney: 3
• B16 mouse melanoma: 1-3
• PC1.0 hamster adenocarcinoma: 10
• HEK293: 2
• A431: 1
• Jurkat: 4

Puromycin N-acetyl-transferase

• http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P13249
• http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/M25346.1

• LOCUS STMPAC 906 bp DNA
• DEFINITION Streptomyces alboniger puromycin N-acetyltransferase (pac) gene, complete cds.
• ACCESSION M25346
• VERSION M25346.1 GI:763524
• KEYWORDS puromycin N-acetyltransferase.
• SOURCE Streptomyces alboniger

Transduction Recommendations

• Perform transductions in triplicate to minimize variability among treatment groups.
• Include positive and negative controls in each experiment.
• Seed the same number of cells in each well.
• Transduce in the presence of low level serum (0.5%) in the assay medium. Low serum can minimize signaling pathways that lead to cross-talk and high background.
• Stem cell transduction use Y-27632, also known as Rho-Associated Coil Kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, increases the cloning efficiency of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). It prevents apoptosis and enhances the survival of single hESCs without affecting their pluripotency, or causing karyotypic abnormalities.

shRNA Transfer Vector Overview

Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) are typically modeled after miRNA hairpin precursors and cloned into a transfer vector that is suitable for either direct transient transfection of the shRNA, or for packaging into a lentiviral particle. Lentiviral transfer vectors are ~8-10 kb in length.

Transient shRNA Transfection

Chemically synthesized siRNA are proven and effective. The shRNA transfer vector alone can be transiently introduced into the dividing cell where the shRNA is driven by type III POL promoters, and then processed to siRNA by cellular machinery. Transient transfection is advantageous for fast analysis of shRNA mediated effects, and may be considered a preliminary approach to lentivirus dependent stable transduction.

Lentivirus Dependent Stable shRNA Transduction

Viral delivery of shRNA is a powerful alternative to transfection for primary cells, and other cell types resistant to cationic lipids. Stable expression is achieved by cassette integration into the target cell chromosomes. Initially the shRNA of interest has to be introduced into the cell by viral trasnduction, subsequently into the nucleus, and then integration into chromosomal DNA.

Vector Dependent Stable shRNA Transfection

The effectiveness of this approach is subject to debate. An shRNA transfer vector may integrate into the genome of the target cell by antibiotic selection alone. This process may occur randomly by the cell's machinery itself, possibly via DNA repair and recombination enzymes. If this phenomenon does occur, integration into inactive heterochromatin may result in little or no shRNA expression. Integration into active euchromatin may allow for shRNA expression. Random integration could also lead to silencing of the shRNA cassette. Several strategies have been developed to overcome the negative position effects of random integration: Site-specific, homologous and transposon-mediated integration strategies are used but require the expression of integration enzymes or additional sequences on the plasmid.

Nucleofection is a non-viral method of introducing DNA molecules efficiently into the nucleus of dividing cells, therefore significantly increasing the chances of chromosomal integration of the transgene. The technology was pioneered by Amaxa

shRNA Transfer Vector Promoters

PolIII

RNA Polymerase III type 3 promoters (H1, 7SK, U6) are common in vector-based expression because they are permissive expressers, they do not require any additional sequence elements, and have simple termination signals. The most abundant cellular RNAs transcribed from a type III RNA pol III promoter are the U6 small nuclear RNA (which play a crucial role in the processing of premature RNA); the 7SK RNA (a negative regulator of RNA polymerase II elongation factor TEFb); and H1 RNA (a component of RNAse P).

Unlike the majority of RNA pol III promoters, type 3 RNA Pol III promoters do not require any additional sequence elements. In addition, termination of transcription by Pol III occurs at definitive tracts of 4–5 thymidines (T4–5) (Example below), which can be inserted downstream of shRNA coding sequences in order to ensure direct termination. These 2 specific properties enable the U6, 7SK, and H1 promoters to be ideal candidates for in vivo delivery systems of siRNAs where DNA templates can undergo transcription into small RNAs with structural features resembling active siRNA/miRNA.

In summary, Pol III promoters are relatively compact, have high activity, and require a simple poly-U tract for termination.

U6

U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) is an essential component of the eukaryotic spliceosomes, is unique in that it is synthesized by RNA polymerase III, while all other U-snRNAs are synthesized by RNA polymerase II. U6 genes are notable for functional upstream regulatory elements which resemble RNA polymerase II regulatory sequence motifs. Tests for both potency and adverse metabolic effects upon primary cells indicate that U6 promoter may exert toxicity relative to H1 or 7SK due in part to higher activity.

U6 snRNA Class III gene initiation

1. SNAPc (SNRNA Activating Protein complex) (also termed PBP and PTF) binds to the PSE (Proximal Sequence Element) centered approximately 55 base pairs upstream of the start site of transcription. This assembly is greatly stimulated by the Pol II transcription factors Oct1 and STAF that bind to an enhancer-like DSE (Distal Sequence Element) at least 200 base pairs upstream of the start site of transcription. These factors and promoter elements are shared between Pol II and Pol III transcription of snRNA genes.

2. SNAPc acts to assemble TFIIIB at a TATA box centered 26 base pairs upstream of the start site of transcription. It is the presence of a TATA box that specifies that the snRNA gene is transcribed by Pol III rather than Pol II.

3. The TFIIIB for U6 snRNA transcription contains a smaller Brf1 paralogue, Brf2. TFIIIB is the transcription factor that assembles Pol III at the start site of transcription. Sequence conservation predicts that TFIIIB containing Brf2 also plays a role in promoter opening.

7SK

7SK is an abundant and evolutionarily conserved small nuclear RNA discovered in the 1970s. 7SK is transcribed by RNA polymerase III from one or more genes belonging to a family of interspersed repeats in the mammalian genome (Murphy et al 1984)]. The human 7SK promoter presents a strong permissivity for the nucleotide in the +1 position and recognizes a cluster of 4 or more T residues as a termination signal. The human 7SK promoter is ideal for the production of shRNAs as it can generate high amounts of shRNAs (Czauderna et al 2003, Koper-Emde et al 2004). In a series of experiments aimed to compare the strength of the human 7SK, H1 and U6 promoters, the best silencing efficiencies of various target genes was consistently obtained with a 7SK promoter (unpublished data;Invivogen).

H1

The H1 promoter drives expression of a unique gene encoding H1 RNA, the RNA component of the human RNase P. The H1 RNA gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase III into a small RNA transcript. The human H1 promoter presents the characteristics of being unusually compact. All the essential elements for transcription, that is octamer, Staf, proximal sequence element and TATA motifs, lie within 100 bp of the 5‘ flanking region. This promoter is highly permissive for the nucleotide at the +1 position which is originally an A. The termination sequence consists of a stretch of 5 thymidines. The cleavage of the transcript after the termination signal occurs after the second uridine generating a 2 nt 3‘ overhang. The H1 promoter has been successfully used in different plasmids to create siRNAs.

CMV

CMV is a RNA Polymerase II promoter. This strong promoter is active in a broad range of cell types and performs better than most pol III promoters under long term selection. However, there are specific reports that CMV driven shRNA do not function properly in certain cell types, including CD34+ hematopoietic progentior cells. Ambion offers pSilencer™ 4.1-CMV plasmid vectors designed for gene silencing experiments in a broad range of cell lines (Cat# AM5775).

The CMV promoter is considered to be a stronger promoter than other common RNA pol II promoters used in mammalian expression vectors such as Simian virus-40 (SV40) and Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) (Foecking, 1986). In vivo, RNA pol II is primarily responsible for transcription of mRNA within the cell. The CMV promoter has the advantage of being highly active in a broad range of cell types, and it is suggested to not interfere with other transcription events as may be the case with the RNA pol III U6 and H1 promoters in some situations.

1. Foecking MK and Hofstetter H. Powerful and versatile enhancer-promoter unit for mammalian expression vectors. Gene. 1986;45(1):101-5. DOI:10.1016/0378-1119(86)90137-x |

shRNA Transfer Vector Components

Additional cassettes that are either essential or may be added to the lentiviral transfer vector in order to improve functionality.

AmpR

Ampicillin resistance gene for bacterial selection when growing the lentivector; ampicilin-resistance gene for selection in E.coli cells.

CMV

CMV promoter typically drives expression of copGFP (fluorescent reporter), puromycin-N-acetyl transferase (drug selectable marker) or truncated H2Kk protein (cell surface marker) for detection and selection of transduced cells.

Alternatives to CMV Promoter

Each type of promoter for selection markers offers different expression levels with different stabilities in each cell line. CMV promoter yields strong expression in many cell lines, however may not function in certain cells, including leukocytes, certain mouse cells, and stem cells. The human phosphoglycerate kinase (hPGK) eukaryotic promoter is ideal for puromycin selection when transduction of cell types known to silence CMV promoter (stem cells, leukocytes, certain mouse cells).

1. Michibata H, Okuno T, Konishi N, Wakimoto K, Kyono K, Aoki K, Kondo Y, Takata K, Kitamura Y, and Taniguchi T. Inhibition of mouse GPM6A expression leads to decreased differentiation of neurons derived from mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2008 Aug;17(4):641-51. DOI:10.1089/scd.2008.0088 |
2. Tang FC, Meng GL, Yang HB, Li CJ, Shi Y, Ding MX, Shang KG, Zhang B, and Xue YF. Stable suppression of gene expression in murine embryonic stem cells by RNAi directed from DNA vector-based short hairpin RNA. Stem Cells. 2004;22(1):93-9. DOI:10.1634/stemcells.22-1-93 |

cPPT

Central polypurine tract is responsible for importing HIV provirus into the nucleus. The addition of this element between the LTRs improves integration kinetics for slow/nondividing cells. Incorporation of cPPT and a posttranscriptional regulatory element (PRE) into lentivirus vectors can improve transduction efficiency and transgene expression.

gag

Packaging signal

Biosafety Feature

None of the HIV-1 genes (gag, pol, rev) will be present in the packaged viral genome, as they are expressed from packaging plasmids lacking packaging signal--therefore, the lentiviral particles generated are replication-incompetent.

Hairpin loop

A hairpin loop sequence between sense and antisense portion. The 9-nt loop sequence (5'-TTCAAGAGA-3') is commonly used in RNA silencing experiments. A 12-nt sequence (5'-CTTCCTGTCAGA-3') may also generate similar results. Loop sequences of 3 to 15 nucleotides have been used successfully by different investigators.

Cloning Strategy for the pSIH lentiviral transfer vector

hPGK

The human phosphoglycerate kinase eukaryotic promoter is ideal for puromycin selection when transduction of cell types known to silence CMV promoter (stem cells, leukocytes, certain mouse cells).

IRES

Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES) sequence allows translation initiation within a messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence. IRES-containing mRNAs can undergo translation independent of regulatory mechanisms controlling recruitment of mRNA to a translation apparatus, including 5'-terminal structures; 7mG cap; methylated 5'-terminal cap structures. Efficient binding of mRNA to ribosomes is dependent on the presence of 5'-terminal 7mG. Removal of m7G decreases translation.

LTRs

Long terminal repeats encompass the cassettes that incorporate into the host genome. The 5' and 3' LTR's serve to promote transcription and polyadenylation of the virion RNA's. The LTR contains all other cis-acting sequences necessary for viral replication.

Biosafety Feature

Deletion in the enhancer of U3 region of 3’LTR ensures self-inactivation of lentiviral construct after transduction and integration into genomic DNA of the target cells.

Psi

Retroviral Psi packaging element is a cis-acting RNA element identified in the genomes of the retroviruses Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV).

pUC ORI

Allows for high-copy replication in E. coli

Puro

Puromycin Resistance gene for selection of transduction events in mammalian systems.

RRE

Rev response element binds gag and involved in packaging of viral transcripts

RSV

Murine Rous sarcoma virus enhancer; Hybrid RSV promoter-R/U5 long terminal repeat; required for viral packaging and transcription. Hybrid RSV-5’LTR promoter provides a high level of expression of the full-length viral construct in 293 cells.

Biosafety Feature

The RSV promoter upstream of the 5’LTR in the lentivirus expression vector allows efficient Tat-independent production of viral RNA, reducing the number of genes from HIV-1 that are used in the packaging system. For third generation lentivirus, the trans-acting function of Tat becomes dispensable if part of the upstream LTR in the transfer vector construct is replaced by constitutively active promoter sequences.

1. Dull T, Zufferey R, Kelly M, Mandel RJ, Nguyen M, Trono D, and Naldini L. A third-generation lentivirus vector with a conditional packaging system. J Virol. 1998 Nov;72(11):8463-71. DOI:10.1128/JVI.72.11.8463-8471.1998 |

SV40 ORI

Allows for episomal replication of plasmid in eukaryotic cells; SV40 origin for stable propagation of the pSIH plasmid in 293 producer cells.

SV40 Poly-A

Transcription termination and polyadenylation

T2A

Coexpression of a reporter gene (copGFP) and a selection marker (puro) from the same promoter (CMV) can take place with the utilization of Thosea asigna virus 2A translational cleavage site. The T2A cleavage site is ~20 amino acids long and is positioned in between the 2 transgenes (copGFP and Puro).

Cotranslational cleavage occurs via a co-translational ribosome skipping mechanism between the C-terminal Glycine and Proline residues, leaving 17 residues attached to the end of copGresidue to the start of puromycin resistance gene.

This allows for balanced expression/coexpression of a reporter gene and a resistance gene/cDNA from the same promoter (CMV).

WPRE

Woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcription regulatory element is capable of

• Prevents poly A site readthrough
• Promotes RNA processing and maturation
• Increases nuclear export of RNA
• For genomic transcripts, enhances vector packaging and increases titer.
• For transduced cells, WPRE stabilizes and improves nuclear export of shRNA transcripts.

Lentiviral Particle Assembly

Lentivirus

Lentiviral vectors are created in a transient transfection system in which a cell line (HEK293T) is co-transfected with 3-4 separate plasmid expression systems. These include the transfer vector plasmid (cPPT & shRNA cassette), the packaging plasmid, and a plasmid with the heterologous envelop gene (ENV) of a different virus (VSV-G). Pseudoviral particles are then collected from the culture media and must undergo titration to measure infectivity prior to experimental use.

Reverse transcriptase and viral integrase components are packaged within the viral particles for cytosolic RT, nuclear translocation, and integration.

Transfer Vector Plasmid

The transfer vector plasmid (~8-10 kb) contains cis-acting genetic sequences necessary for the vector to infect the target cell and for transfer of the shRNA cassette, and contains restriction sites for insertion of the shRNA. The 3’ and 5’ LTRs, the original envelop proteins, and gag sequence promoter have been removed. The shRNA transfer vector alone can be transiently introduced into the dividing cell where the shRNA is synthesized by cellular machinery.

In order to culture the transfer vector effectively and avoid recombination events, a suitable e. coli strain Invitrogen MAX Efficiency® Stbl2™ Competent Cells SKU# 10268-019, and culture temperature; 30°C expression, incubation temperature is important to optimize performance of the competent cells to produce intact lentivector.

However, there are distinct differences between E. Coli-dependent vector-based recombination events versus point mutations. Both can influence the fidelity of the lentivector, however the implications of point mutations in the construct is much more significant. Since the labor costs associated with cloning and production of the shRNA constructs are significant, be sure to invest your time in a transfer vector that is proven in literature or contains lot specific data for adequate controls from the vendor. DO NOT assume the vector you are purchasing on paper is the one you receive in the vial.

lentivector pSD31 for constitutive shRNA expression and pSD400 for conditional shRNA expression

Constitutive transfer vectors

Currently, most siRNA expression vectors are engineered to drive siRNA transcription from the polymerase III promoters U6 and H1. These promoters are particularly suited for hairpin siRNA (shRNA) expression, since they contain all of the cis-acting promoter elements upstream of the transcription initiation site and deploy a polyT transcription termination site that leads to the addition of 2-nucleotide (nt) overhangs (UU) to shRNAs, a feature that is important for siRNA function.

1. Zhang J, Wang C, Ke N, Bliesath J, Chionis J, He QS, Li QX, Chatterton JE, Wong-Staal F, and Zhou D. A more efficient RNAi inducible system for tight regulation of gene expression in mammalian cells and xenograft animals. RNA. 2007 Aug;13(8):1375-83. DOI:10.1261/rna.520707 |
2. Paule MR and White RJ. Survey and summary: transcription by RNA polymerases I and III. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Mar 15;28(6):1283-98. DOI:10.1093/nar/28.6.1283 |

Inducible (conditional) transfer vectors

RNA polymerase III-dependent promoters containing operator sequences (tetO) of the E. coli tetracycline resistance operon. Binding of the tetracycline resistance operon repressor (tetR) to tetO blocks transcription, Adding doxycycline (dox) causes release of TetR and production of the shRNA.

Tetracycline Operator

Specific inhibition of gene expression using a stably integrated siRNA (Tiscornia et al. 2003) is not suitable for silencing genes that are involved in cell growth or survival (Zhou et al. 2006). In such cases, regulating siRNA expression in mammalian cells has become essential. Having the ability to control when and how much of a particular siRNA is expressed makes it possible to study temporal- and concentration-dependent effects on a host system and allow cells to grow prior to gene silencing by “toxic” siRNAs. Furthermore, studying a host cell's response to the presence and absence of siRNA often leads to further understanding of the target gene's function.

The inducible RNAi system uses a modified form of the regulated, tetracycline-controlled gene expression system described by Gossen and Bujard (2002) in mammalian cells for the purpose of temporal silencing target genes. This system relies on two components: a tetracycline regulatory protein (TetR), which has affinity to the tetracycline operator (TetO); and a TetO-tethered pol III promoter, whose transcription activity is blocked by binding to the regulatory TetR. In the absence of tetracycline (Tet), the TetR protein binds to the TetO sequence within the promoter and acts as a potent transcription suppressor. The shRNA expression is restored when the cell culture medium is added with either Tet or doxycycline (Dox), a Tet derivative, which binds to and causes dissociation of TetR from the pol III promoter via a TetR conformation change (Zhou et al. 2006). This system allows for observation of the loss-of-function phenotypes under noninduced and induced conditions in the same isogenic cells, excluding other potential interferences.

1. Zhang J, Wang C, Ke N, Bliesath J, Chionis J, He QS, Li QX, Chatterton JE, Wong-Staal F, and Zhou D. A more efficient RNAi inducible system for tight regulation of gene expression in mammalian cells and xenograft animals. RNA. 2007 Aug;13(8):1375-83. DOI:10.1261/rna.520707 |
2. Qin XF, An DS, Chen IS, and Baltimore D. Inhibiting HIV-1 infection in human T cells by lentiviral-mediated delivery of small interfering RNA against CCR5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):183-8. DOI:10.1073/pnas.232688199 |
3. Tiscornia G, Singer O, Ikawa M, and Verma IM. A general method for gene knockdown in mice by using lentiviral vectors expressing small interfering RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1844-8. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0437912100 |
4. Gossen M and Bujard H. Studying gene function in eukaryotes by conditional gene inactivation. Annu Rev Genet. 2002;36:153-73. DOI:10.1146/annurev.genet.36.041002.120114 |
5. Zhou D, He QS, Wang C, Zhang J, and Wong-Staal F. RNA interference and potential applications. Curr Top Med Chem. 2006;6(9):901-11. DOI:10.2174/156802606777303630 |
6. Herold MJ, van den Brandt J, Seibler J, and Reichardt HM. Inducible and reversible gene silencing by stable integration of an shRNA-encoding lentivirus in transgenic rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 25;105(47):18507-12. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0806213105 |

Envelope Gene Plasmid

The envelope gene of a different virus specifies what type of cell to target and infect. Normally HIV can infect only helper T-cells because they use their gp120 protein to bind to the CD4 receptor. However, it is possible to genetically exchange the CD4 receptor-binding protein for another envelope protein that codes for different cell types. This gives the HIV lentiviral vector a broad range of possible target cells. There a few types of heterologous envelope proteins.

There are two major points to consider when choosing which coat (pseudotype). First, because VSV-G pseudotyped virus may infect human tissue, it may not be preferable to use if one is working strictly in a mouse system. Working with human infectious agents will likely require a heightened BLS lab safety level. A second point of consideration is the limitations imposed by the ecotropic coat: it is difficult to concentrate the virus due to the inherent instability of the ecotropic coat. Virus ultracentrifugation concentration is often necessary when infecting certain cell types or when generating transgenic mice, and for this reason, many choose to use VSV-G pseudotyped virus because the particles are stable to the high g-forces of ultracentrifugation. Other Polyethylene Glycol based concentration methods exist that may effectively address this concern. Even with highly concentrated virus, there is a possibility that the VSV-G or ecotropic pseudotypes may still display differing cell-type specificities for infection, an important consideration when planning an experiment. For example, in the CNS, VSV-G mediates vector entry primarily in neurons, while astrocytes appear to be better infected using other envelopes.

There are a growing number of examples of viral coat proteins for pseudotyping the virus that influences the tropism of infection in cell type in vitro, and tissue/organ type in vivo. For in vitro use, envelope glycoproteins and culture conditions employed should be carefully evaluated in order to address variable infectivity and phenotype awareness for each application.

Envelope (viral coat) proteins

Alphavirus

Ebola virus

Feline leukemia virus

Marburg virus

Rabies virus

Vesicular stomatitis virus

Ebola virus

(Filovirus): Allows transduction of apical surface airway epithelium. Zaire subtype EBO virus glycoproteins (GP) EboZ pseudotypes were able to efficiently transduce after apical airway epithelial application. Broad tropism for mammalian cell types.

1. Powers AM, Brault AC, Shirako Y, Strauss EG, Kang W, Strauss JH, and Weaver SC. Evolutionary relationships and systematics of the alphaviruses. J Virol. 2001 Nov;75(21):10118-31. DOI:10.1128/JVI.75.21.10118-10131.2001 |
2. Kobinger GP, Weiner DJ, Yu QC, and Wilson JM. Filovirus-pseudotyped lentiviral vector can efficiently and stably transduce airway epithelia in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Mar;19(3):225-30. DOI:10.1038/85664 |

Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV)

A noncytopathic arenavirus shown to infect a broad range of different cell types. Less inflammatory with tropism for the liver.

1. Beyer WR, Westphal M, Ostertag W, and von Laer D. Oncoretrovirus and lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein: generation, concentration, and broad host range. J Virol. 2002 Feb;76(3):1488-95. DOI:10.1128/jvi.76.3.1488-1495.2002 |
2. Kang Y, Stein CS, Heth JA, Sinn PL, Penisten AK, Staber PD, Ratliff KL, Shen H, Barker CK, Martins I, Sharkey CM, Sanders DA, McCray PB Jr, and Davidson BL. In vivo gene transfer using a nonprimate lentiviral vector pseudotyped with Ross River Virus glycoproteins. J Virol. 2002 Sep;76(18):9378-88. DOI:10.1128/jvi.76.18.9378-9388.2002 |

Marburg virus

(Filovirus): Allows transduction of apical surface airway epithelium. Broad tropism for mammalian cell types.

1. Sinn PL, Hickey MA, Staber PD, Dylla DE, Jeffers SA, Davidson BL, Sanders DA, and McCray PB Jr. Lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with filoviral envelope glycoproteins transduce airway epithelia from the apical surface independently of folate receptor alpha. J Virol. 2003 May;77(10):5902-10. DOI:10.1128/jvi.77.10.5902-5910.2003 |
2. Chan SY, Speck RF, Ma MC, and Goldsmith MA. Distinct mechanisms of entry by envelope glycoproteins of Marburg and Ebola (Zaire) viruses. J Virol. 2000 May;74(10):4933-7. DOI:10.1128/jvi.74.10.4933-4937.2000 |

Mokola lyssaviruses (MK-G)

A neurotropic virus causing rabies disease. Targets neuronal cells and neural stem cells.

1. Desmaris N, Bosch A, Salaün C, Petit C, Prévost MC, Tordo N, Perrin P, Schwartz O, de Rocquigny H, and Heard JM. Production and neurotropism of lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with lyssavirus envelope glycoproteins. Mol Ther. 2001 Aug;4(2):149-56. DOI:10.1006/mthe.2001.0431 |
2. Kang Y, Stein CS, Heth JA, Sinn PL, Penisten AK, Staber PD, Ratliff KL, Shen H, Barker CK, Martins I, Sharkey CM, Sanders DA, McCray PB Jr, and Davidson BL. In vivo gene transfer using a nonprimate lentiviral vector pseudotyped with Ross River Virus glycoproteins. J Virol. 2002 Sep;76(18):9378-88. DOI:10.1128/jvi.76.18.9378-9388.2002 |

Rabies virus

Target neuronal cells and neural stem cells.

1. Desmaris N, Bosch A, Salaün C, Petit C, Prévost MC, Tordo N, Perrin P, Schwartz O, de Rocquigny H, and Heard JM. Production and neurotropism of lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with lyssavirus envelope glycoproteins. Mol Ther. 2001 Aug;4(2):149-56. DOI:10.1006/mthe.2001.0431 |
2. Kang Y, Stein CS, Heth JA, Sinn PL, Penisten AK, Staber PD, Ratliff KL, Shen H, Barker CK, Martins I, Sharkey CM, Sanders DA, McCray PB Jr, and Davidson BL. In vivo gene transfer using a nonprimate lentiviral vector pseudotyped with Ross River Virus glycoproteins. J Virol. 2002 Sep;76(18):9378-88. DOI:10.1128/jvi.76.18.9378-9388.2002 |
3. Reiser J. Production and concentration of pseudotyped HIV-1-based gene transfer vectors. Gene Ther. 2000 Jun;7(11):910-3. DOI:10.1038/sj.gt.3301188 |

RD114/TR

A chimeric envelope glycoprotein made of the extracellular and transmembrane domains of the feline leukemia virus RD114 and the cytoplasmic tail of the murine leukemia virus amphotropic envelope. Transduces primary lymphocytes; RD114/TR-pseudotyped vectors showed augmented transduction of human and macaque primary blood lymphocytes and CD34+ cells.

1. Di Nunzio F, Piovani B, Cosset FL, Mavilio F, and Stornaiuolo A. Transduction of human hematopoietic stem cells by lentiviral vectors pseudotyped with the RD114-TR chimeric envelope glycoprotein. Hum Gene Ther. 2007 Sep;18(9):811-20. DOI:10.1089/hum.2006.138 |
2. Sandrin V, Boson B, Salmon P, Gay W, Nègre D, Le Grand R, Trono D, and Cosset FL. Lentiviral vectors pseudotyped with a modified RD114 envelope glycoprotein show increased stability in sera and augmented transduction of primary lymphocytes and CD34+ cells derived from human and nonhuman primates. Blood. 2002 Aug 1;100(3):823-32. DOI:10.1182/blood-2001-11-0042 |

Ross River virus (RRV; alphavirus)

Less inflammatory with tropism for the liver. RRV-pseudotyped FIV vectors (RRV/FIV) predominantly transduced the liver of recipient mice. Transduction efficiency in the liver with the RRV/FIV was 20-fold higher than that achieved with the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSV-G) pseudotype.

1. Kahl CA, Marsh J, Fyffe J, Sanders DA, and Cornetta K. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-derived lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with envelope glycoproteins derived from Ross River virus and Semliki Forest virus. J Virol. 2004 Feb;78(3):1421-30. DOI:10.1128/jvi.78.3.1421-1430.2004 |
2. Sharkey CM, North CL, Kuhn RJ, and Sanders DA. Ross River virus glycoprotein-pseudotyped retroviruses and stable cell lines for their production. J Virol. 2001 Mar;75(6):2653-9. DOI:10.1128/JVI.75.6.2653-2659.2001 |
3. Kang Y, Stein CS, Heth JA, Sinn PL, Penisten AK, Staber PD, Ratliff KL, Shen H, Barker CK, Martins I, Sharkey CM, Sanders DA, McCray PB Jr, and Davidson BL. In vivo gene transfer using a nonprimate lentiviral vector pseudotyped with Ross River Virus glycoproteins. J Virol. 2002 Sep;76(18):9378-88. DOI:10.1128/jvi.76.18.9378-9388.2002 |

Semliki Forest virus (SFV; alphavirus)

VSV-G and RRV pseudotypes have comparable physical titers, but infectious titers with the RRV pseudotype are lower than with VSV-G. Incorporation of SFV glycoproteins into lentivirus vector is less efficient, leading to decreased physical and infectious titers. The transduction rates with VSV-G-, RRV-, and SFV-pseudotyped lentivirus vectors into adherent cell lines can be significantly increased by using a combination of Polybrene and plates coated with CH-296 recombinant fibronectin fragments.

1. Kahl CA, Marsh J, Fyffe J, Sanders DA, and Cornetta K. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-derived lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with envelope glycoproteins derived from Ross River virus and Semliki Forest virus. J Virol. 2004 Feb;78(3):1421-30. DOI:10.1128/jvi.78.3.1421-1430.2004 |

Sindbis virus (SINV; alphavirus)

Sindbis virus encodes two transmembrane envelope proteins, E1 and E2. E2 is responsible for receptor binding; E1 is responsible for pH-dependent fusion. SINV when modified to contain the Fc-binding domain of protein A, this envelope gives a significant enhancement in specificity in combination with antibodies specific for HLA and CD4 relative to that without antibody.

1. Kahl CA, Marsh J, Fyffe J, Sanders DA, and Cornetta K. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-derived lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with envelope glycoproteins derived from Ross River virus and Semliki Forest virus. J Virol. 2004 Feb;78(3):1421-30. DOI:10.1128/jvi.78.3.1421-1430.2004 |
2. Morizono K, Bristol G, Xie YM, Kung SK, and Chen IS. Antibody-directed targeting of retroviral vectors via cell surface antigens. J Virol. 2001 Sep;75(17):8016-20. DOI:10.1128/jvi.75.17.8016-8020.2001 |

Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV; alphavirus)

Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) is a distant relative of SINV, RRV, and SFV and is a representative of the New World alphaviruses. It is an arbovirus that is normally maintained in a “silent” enzootic cycle between mosquitoes of Culex (Melanoconion) spp. and rodent reservoir hosts.

1. Kolokoltsov AA, Weaver SC, and Davey RA. Efficient functional pseudotyping of oncoretroviral and lentiviral vectors by Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus envelope proteins. J Virol. 2005 Jan;79(2):756-63. DOI:10.1128/JVI.79.2.756-763.2005 |

Vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein (VSV-G)

VSV is broadly tropic and highly efficient at particle production. Broad tropism. Less inflammatory with in vivo tropism for the liver. Pseudotyping viral vectors with vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G) enables the transduction of an extensive range of cell types from different species. Two important parameters of the VSV-G-pseudotyping phenomenon relating to the transduction potential of lentiviral vectors: (1) the glycosylation status of VSV-G, and (2) the quantity of glycoprotein associated with virions.

1. Burns JC, Friedmann T, Driever W, Burrascano M, and Yee JK. Vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein pseudotyped retroviral vectors: concentration to very high titer and efficient gene transfer into mammalian and nonmammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8033-7. DOI:10.1073/pnas.90.17.8033 |
2. Borok Z, Harboe-Schmidt JE, Brody SL, You Y, Zhou B, Li X, Cannon PM, Kim KJ, Crandall ED, and Kasahara N. Vesicular stomatitis virus G-pseudotyped lentivirus vectors mediate efficient apical transduction of polarized quiescent primary alveolar epithelial cells. J Virol. 2001 Dec;75(23):11747-54. DOI:10.1128/JVI.75.23.11747-11754.2001 |
3. Reiser J. Production and concentration of pseudotyped HIV-1-based gene transfer vectors. Gene Ther. 2000 Jun;7(11):910-3. DOI:10.1038/sj.gt.3301188 |
4. Desmaris N, Bosch A, Salaün C, Petit C, Prévost MC, Tordo N, Perrin P, Schwartz O, de Rocquigny H, and Heard JM. Production and neurotropism of lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with lyssavirus envelope glycoproteins. Mol Ther. 2001 Aug;4(2):149-56. DOI:10.1006/mthe.2001.0431 |
5. Farley DC, Iqball S, Smith JC, Miskin JE, Kingsman SM, and Mitrophanous KA. Factors that influence VSV-G pseudotyping and transduction efficiency of lentiviral vectors-in vitro and in vivo implications. J Gene Med. 2007 May;9(5):345-56. DOI:10.1002/jgm.1022 |

Packaging Plasmid

The cycle of viral packaging, infection & integration

The packaging plasmid is the backbone of the virus system. In this plasmid are found the elements required for vector packaging such as structural proteins, HIV genes (except the gene env which codes for infection of T cells, or the vector would only be able to infect these cells), and the enzymes that generate vector particles.

gag/rev/pol

Most HIV lentivector systems require only 3 HIV encoded proteins, Gag, Pol, and Rev.

The RNA genome of HIV consists of at least 7 structural landmarks (LTR, TAR, RRE, PE, SLIP, CRS, INS) and nine genes (gag, pol, and env, tat, rev, nef, vif, vpr, vpu, and tev) encoding 19 proteins. gag & pol contain information needed to make the structural proteins for new virus particles. The rev protein (p19) is involved in shuttling RNAs from the nucleus and the cytoplasm by binding to the RRE RNA element.

CMV

Also contained is the human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) which is responsible for the expression of the virus proteins (gag, rev, pol) during translation. The packaging signals and their adjacent signals are removed so the parts responsible for packaging the viral DNA have been separated from the parts that activate them. Thus, the packaging sequences will not be incorporated into the viral genome and the virus will not reproduce after it has infected the host cell.

6. Amado RG and Chen IS. Lentiviral vectors--the promise of gene therapy within reach?. Science. 1999 Jul 30;285(5428):674-6. DOI:10.1126/science.285.5428.674 |
7. Naldini L, Blömer U, Gallay P, Ory D, Mulligan R, Gage FH, Verma IM, and Trono D. In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science. 1996 Apr 12;272(5259):263-7. DOI:10.1126/science.272.5259.263 |

• Wikipedia on viral vectors
• Lentivirus in Gene Therapy
• McManus Lab @ UCSF

Replication Competent Virus (RCV) Testing

Most viral vectors are disabled so replication competent viruses are not readily formed by any known biological process in normal hosts. Lentivirus RCV testing is performed by ELISA for the presence of p24 antigen in the media of cell culture inoculated with viral stock solution. Confirmation of the complete absence of RCV must be documented prior to use in animals.

RCV testing is not required for third-generation, commercially available Lentiviral vector systems.

Third generation HIV-based Lentivirus expression systems were originally for gene therapy applications. Due to their biosafety (BSL2), commercial vendors including Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. now offer these safe, and easy-to-use products.

3rd generation pseudoviral particles can infect target cells and express effector or reporter molecules but cannot replicate within target cells for two reasons:

1. The viral structural genes are absent

2. The LTRs are designed to be self-inactivating upon transduction

• PMID=9765382
• Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.
• System Biosciences

Biosafety of 3rd generation Lentivirus

The third generation of lentivirus vectors provides multiple safeguards against the production of replication competent lentivirus (RCL) (Dull, 1998) and are suitable for use under Biosafety Level 2 environment.

3rd generation Lentivirus Biosafety Features

• A deletion in the enhancer of the U3 region of 3’ΔLTR ensures self-inactivation of the lentiviral construct after transduction and integration into genomic DNA of the target cells. Long terminal repeats encompass the cassettes that incorporate into the host genome. The 5' and 3' LTR's serve to promote transcription and polyadenylation of the virion RNA's. The LTR contains all other cis-acting sequences necessary for viral replication. Deletion in the enhancer of U3 region of 3’LTR ensures self-inactivation of lentiviral construct after transduction and integration into genomic DNA of the target cells.
• The RSV promoter (in HIV-based vectors) and the CMV promoter (in FIV-based vectors) upstream of 5’LTR in the lentivector allow efficient Tat-independent production of viral RNA, reducing the number of genes from HIV-1 that are used in this system. For third generation lentivirus, the trans-acting function of Tat becomes dispensable if part of the upstream LTR in the transfer vector construct is replaced by constitutively active promoter sequences.
• The number of lentiviral genes necessary for packaging, replication and transduction is reduced to three (gag, pol, rev).
• The corresponding proteins are expressed from different plasmids (for HIV-based packaging plasmids) that lack packaging signals. The packaging plasmids share no significant homology to any of the expression lentivectors, the pVSV-G expression vector, or any other vector, to prevent generation of recombinant replication competent virus.
• None of the HIV-1 genes (gag, pol, rev) are present in the packaged viral genome, as they are expressed from separate plasmids lacking packaging signal. Therefore, the lentiviral particles generated are replication-incompetent. The genetic elements are split into four plasmids.
• Produced pseudoviral particles will carry only a copy of the clone-in construct.

Production of RCV can only be the result of four unlikely events: recombination of four plasmids and reconstitution of the U3 LTR promoter activity. Since the probability of the generation of an RCV during vector production is excessively low, vector batches would be contaminated with low number of RCV particles if any (PMID:12907156). Rodents are dead end hosts for such RCV: viruses could enter into cells but not produce any progeny in vivo. Infectious virus production by cells from HIV-transgenic mice was documented only ex vivo under special conditions (PMID:14585206). RCV amplification in rodents is therefore highly unlikely.

A system incorporating all these safeguards can be seen as safe and is usually classified as BSL2.

• PMID=9765382
• Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.
• System Biosciences

Biosafety Level 2 (BSL-2) Spill Procedure

Spills involving BSL-2 agents

• 1) Alert others in the lab to evacuate due to a biological spill, then close lab entrance door
• 2) If the spilled material may be aerosolized:
• a. Post a warning sign on the entrance door (“Biohazard Spill – Do Not Enter”)
• b. Allow aerosols to settle for at least 30 minutes before starting cleanup
• c. Notify EHS if HEPA filtered respirator is required to prevent inhalation exposure
• 3) Put on appropriate personal protective equipment (gloves, lab coat, face protection, etc.)
• 4) Cover spill with absorbent material (i.e. paper towels)
• 5) Carefully pour disinfectant around edges of spill and then work inward (avoid splashing)
• 6) Allow 20 minute disinfectant contact time
• 7) Remove broken glass or other sharps with a brush and dustpan, tongs, or forceps
• a. Place contaminated sharps in a puncture-resistant biohazard sharps container
• 8) Use paper towels to wipe up spilled material, then dispose of towels with infectious waste
• 9) Wipe down all surfaces or items once more with absorbent material and disinfectant
• 10) Place all contaminated disposable materials not containing sharps in a biohazard bag
• 11) Place all contaminated re-usable items in biohazard bag, then sterilize by autoclaving
• 12) Remove gloves and other protective equipment, then wash hands with soap and water

Personnel contamination involving BSL-2 agents

• 1. Remove contaminated clothing (without exposing more skin), then place contaminated clothing in a biohazard bag for autoclaving
• 2. Thoroughly wash the exposed area of the body with soap and water
• 3. Report the incident to your supervisor or Principal Investigator
• 4. Report the incident to the Biosafety Officer for further investigation
• 5. Seek medical attention if the contamination has resulted in a potential exposure