Harvard:Biophysics 101/2007/Notebook:Info Output/: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Denizkural (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===General=== | ===General=== | ||
* GOAL: Use MedStory (currently in beta - features and XML parsing may change) to deliver: | * GOAL: Use MedStory (currently in beta - features and XML parsing may change) to deliver info that a newly-diagnosed user would be interested in seeing: | ||
** Drugs and substances of interest | ** Drugs and substances of interest | ||
** Procedures | ** Procedures | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Deniz's Plan/Work== | ==Deniz's Plan/Work== | ||
* Will write a function to retrieve | |||
** Useful links (a more 'respectable' stable of sites) | |||
** Scholarly information links. |
Latest revision as of 02:46, 19 April 2007
Plan
General
- GOAL: Use MedStory (currently in beta - features and XML parsing may change) to deliver info that a newly-diagnosed user would be interested in seeing:
- Drugs and substances of interest
- Procedures
- Drugs in clinical studies
- Clinical trials
- Other possible information we should consider showing the patient:
- Experts
- Research centers
- Genes
Possible Issues
- Is it somewhat ethically suspect to simply swipe these things (even if they're credited) from MedStory?
- The format of MedStory does have XML-based (and thus, easily Python-parsable) sections, including News and Clinical Trials, but it doesn't have it for the bar-graphed items, which include information we really want to present to the user.
Tiff's Plan/Work
- Will try to figure out:
- Drugs
- Clinical trials
Deniz's Plan/Work
- Will write a function to retrieve
- Useful links (a more 'respectable' stable of sites)
- Scholarly information links.