Holcombe:Fugalpetal: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Holcombe}} | {{Template:Holcombe}} | ||
* reporting or pointing to flashed object location has foveal bias, esp. after a delay<cite>ShethShimojo</cite> | |||
* expansion flow yields more MEG response near V1 than contraction <cite>HollidayMeese</cite> | * expansion flow yields more MEG response near V1 than contraction <cite>HollidayMeese</cite> | ||
* superposed moving gratings in periphery with opposite directions biased foveofugally <cite>GeorgesonHarris78</cite> | * superposed moving gratings in periphery with opposite directions biased foveofugally <cite>GeorgesonHarris78</cite> | ||
* motion adaptation near fovea tends to have effects throughout the visual field <cite>McGrawRoach</cite> | |||
* spokes illusion <cite>SpokesIllusion</cite> | * spokes illusion <cite>SpokesIllusion</cite> | ||
* migraine auras usually spread foveal->peripheral, but can go opposite way. But never isoeccentric, apparently. Has any theory tried to explain this? | * migraine auras usually spread foveal->peripheral, but can go opposite way. But never isoeccentric, apparently. Has any theory tried to explain this? | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
#BrennerMamassianSmeets pmid=18318633 | #BrennerMamassianSmeets pmid=18318633 | ||
#SpokesIllusion pmid=10694971 | #SpokesIllusion pmid=10694971 | ||
#McGrawRoach pmid=18831595 | |||
#ShethShimojo pmid=11164448 |
Latest revision as of 19:31, 12 June 2010
Recent members• Alex Holcombe
|
Projects• Testing Booth Calendar |
|
Technical• Skills Checklist |
Other• Plots,Graphs
|
- reporting or pointing to flashed object location has foveal bias, esp. after a delay[1]
- expansion flow yields more MEG response near V1 than contraction [2]
- superposed moving gratings in periphery with opposite directions biased foveofugally [3]
- motion adaptation near fovea tends to have effects throughout the visual field [4]
- spokes illusion [5]
- migraine auras usually spread foveal->peripheral, but can go opposite way. But never isoeccentric, apparently. Has any theory tried to explain this?
Refs
<biblio>
- HollidayMeese pmid=19146359
- GeorgesonHarris78 pmid=733443
- Bocianski pmid=18634818
- BrennerMamassianSmeets pmid=18318633
- SpokesIllusion pmid=10694971
- McGrawRoach pmid=18831595
- ShethShimojo pmid=11164448