Holcombe:LoOrHighLevel: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
• has both temporal freq and rps limit? <br> | • has both temporal freq and rps limit? <br> | ||
• temp freq limit reflects low-level or can be gated by color attention? (e.g. Fujisaki & NIshida A/V) <br> | • temp freq limit reflects low-level or can be gated by color attention? (e.g. Fujisaki & NIshida A/V) <br> | ||
In acuity at least, contrast-dependence, separation dependence etc. listed here | |||
[[[Holcombe|VernierRelated]] | |||
Revision as of 12:42, 10 February 2010
Recent members• Alex Holcombe
|
Projects• Testing Booth Calendar |
|
Technical• Skills Checklist |
Other• Plots,Graphs
|
Is your visual phenomenon/threshold determined at a low level or a high level?
-Show something is high-level by
• not affected much by equiluminance, 2nd-order
• dichoptic same
• not affected much by contrast
• benefits from mobile computation even with large steps
• masking?
• has both temporal freq and rps limit?
• temp freq limit reflects low-level or can be gated by color attention? (e.g. Fujisaki & NIshida A/V)
In acuity at least, contrast-dependence, separation dependence etc. listed here [[[Holcombe|VernierRelated]]
