Holcombe:TemporalNoise: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Buttonpress (sensorimotor synchronization) vs. other tasks== | ==Buttonpress (sensorimotor synchronization) vs. other tasks== | ||
[[Image:SlopesNoIntercepts.png]] | [[Image:SlopesNoIntercepts.png]], [[Image:Slopes.png]] | ||
*is variability consistently less than for other tasks? | *is variability consistently less than for other tasks? | ||
Yes for ML, AH, DL poster data, by 20-30 ms. This includes dot-crossing predictive task | Yes for ML, AH, DL poster data, by 20-30 ms. This includes dot-crossing predictive task | ||
DL in 3 different runs [[Image:ButtonPressTemporalNoiseDLAHoldnew.png|see this image]] shows low temporal noise, and AH ended up with better temporal noise (plus remarkable property of his histogram, that never late, skewed distribution; note: need to look at all 3 of his histograms) | DL in 3 different runs [[Image:ButtonPressTemporalNoiseDLAHoldnew.png|see this image]] shows low temporal noise, and AH ended up with better temporal noise (plus remarkable property of his histogram, that never late, skewed distribution; note: need to look at all 3 of his histograms) | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 26 April 2008
Recent members• Alex Holcombe
|
Projects• Testing Booth Calendar |
|
Technical• Skills Checklist |
Other• Plots,Graphs
|
Buttonpress (sensorimotor synchronization) vs. other tasks
, 
- is variability consistently less than for other tasks?
Yes for ML, AH, DL poster data, by 20-30 ms. This includes dot-crossing predictive task
DL in 3 different runs 
shows low temporal noise, and AH ended up with better temporal noise (plus remarkable property of his histogram, that never late, skewed distribution; note: need to look at all 3 of his histograms)
