Holcombe:TemporalNoise: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The rest of the experiments: 800x600 at 120 Hz (ViewSonic) | The rest of the experiments: 800x600 at 120 Hz (ViewSonic) | ||
==Temporal noise for every subject== | |||
[[Image:SlopesNoIntercepts.png]], [[Image:Slopes.png]] | [[Image:SlopesNoIntercepts.png]], [[Image:Slopes.png]] | ||
Revision as of 00:00, 30 April 2008
Recent members• Alex Holcombe
|
Projects• Testing Booth Calendar |
|
Technical• Skills Checklist |
Other• Plots,Graphs
|
Method
-Screens:
Radius experiment: 800x600 at 160 Hz (Mitsubishi)
The rest of the experiments: 800x600 at 120 Hz (ViewSonic)
Temporal noise for every subject
, 
Buttonpress (sensorimotor synchronization) vs. other tasks
- is variability consistently less than for other tasks?
Yes for ML, AH, DL poster data, by 20-30 ms. This includes dot-crossing predictive task
For data not in table above, DL in 3 different runs 
shows low temporal noise, and AH ended up with better temporal noise (plus remarkable property of his histogram, that never late, skewed distribution; note: need to look at all 3 of his histograms)
